ascending auctions
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

67
(FIVE YEARS 7)

H-INDEX

15
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
Jayeeta Bhattacharya ◽  
Nathalie Gimenes ◽  
Emmanuel Guerre
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Ayman Chouayakh ◽  
Isabel Amigo ◽  
Aurelien Bechler ◽  
Patrick Maille ◽  
Loutfi Nuaymi
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Aaron Barkley ◽  
Joachim R. Groeger ◽  
Robert A. Miller
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 609-636
Author(s):  
Yu Zhu

This paper studies the inference problem of an infinite‐dimensional parameter with a shape restriction. This parameter is identified by arbitrarily many unconditional moment equalities. The shape restriction leads to a convex restriction set. I propose a test of the shape restriction, which controls size uniformly and applies to both point‐identified and partially identified models. The test can be inverted to construct confidence sets after imposing the shape restriction. Monte Carlo experiments show the finite‐sample properties of this method. In an empirical illustration, I apply the method to ascending auctions held by the US Forest Service and show that imposing shape restrictions can significantly improve inference.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosane Hungria-Gunnelin

Purpose This paper aims to empirically test the effect of list price and bidding strategies in ascending auctions of residential real estate. Design/methodology/approach Three regression models are estimated, using a unique data set from 629 condominium apartments in the inner-city of Stockholm, Sweden, sold between January 2010 and December 2011. Findings The results show that jump bidding has the predicted effect of reducing competition by scaring off bidders. However, a higher average bid increment leads to a higher selling price. Furthermore, results show that a fast auction in terms of average time between bids acts to increase the probability of so-called auction fever as both the number of bidders and the selling price are positively correlated with the speed of the auction. While the average behavior of all auction participants, in terms of jump bidding and time between bids, significantly affects auction outcomes, differences in strategies applied by winners and losers show mixed results. The results of this study with respect to sellers’ list price strategy show that underpricing is an ineffective strategy in terms of enticing more bidders to participate in the auction. Furthermore, underpricing is not sufficient to have a positive effect on the selling price. Originality/value This paper is one of the first papers to empirically analyze how different bidding strategies affect the outcome of residential real estate auctions in terms of competition and the final selling price.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document