Equations of State of Ca-Silicates and Phase Diagram of the CaSiO3 System under Upper Mantle Conditions

The equations of state of different phases in the CaSiO3 system (wollastonite, pseudowollastonite, breyite (walstromite), larnite (Ca2SiO4), titanite-structured CaSi2O5 and CaSiO3-perovskite) are constructed using a thermodynamic model based on the Helmholtz free energy. We used known experimental measurements of heat capacity, enthalpy, and thermal expansion at zero pressure and high temperatures, and volume measurements at different pressures and temperatures for calculation of parameters of equations of state of studied Ca-silicates. The used thermodynamic model has allowed us to calculate a full set of thermodynamic properties (entropy, heat capacity, bulk moduli, thermal expansion, Gibbs energy, etc.) of Ca-silicates in a wide range of pressures and temperatures. The phase diagram of the CaSiO3 system is constructed at pressures up to 20 GPa and temperatures up to 2000 K and clarifies the phase boundaries of Ca-silicates under upper mantle conditions. The calculated wollastonite–breyite equilibrium line corresponds to equation P(GPa) = −4.7 × T(K) + 3.14. The calculated density and adiabatic bulk modulus of CaSiO3-perovskite is compared with the PREM model. The calcium content in the perovskite composition will increase the density of mineral and it good agree with the density according to the PREM model at the lower mantle region.

Bridgmanite-Predominant Lower Mantle Evidenced from Velocity and Density Profiles across the 660-km Discontinuity

Earth’s mantle composition is essential to our understanding of its physics and dynamics. Here we report single-crystal elasticity (Cij) of (Al,Fe)-bearing bridgmanite, Mg0.88Fe0.1Al0.14Si0.90O3 with Fe3+/∑Fe=~0.65, up to ~82 GPa measured in diamond anvil cells. Together with heat capacity measurements on bridgmanite and ferropericlase, we develop a fully internally-consistent thermoelastic model to simultaneously evaluate lower-mantle mineralogy and geotherm via comparisons of P-wave, S-wave velocities, and density (VP, VS, and ρ) with one-dimensional seismic profiles. Our best-fit model demonstrates the lower mantle consists of ~89 vol% (Al,Fe)-bearing bridgmanite, ~4 vol% ferropericlase, and ~7 vol% CaSiO3 perovskite. A chemically layered mantle with pyrolitic upper mantle and bridgmanite-predominant lower mantle would display ~3.2(±1.5)%, ~5.2(±1.5)%, and ~5.0(±1.0)% jumps in VP, VS, and ρ, respectively, across the 660-km discontinuity, which are well consistent with seismic reflection observations. The lower mantle could have become bridgmanite-predominant via accumulations of ancient silica-rich materials, which helps explain current deep-Earth seismic and geochemical signatures.

Origin, properties, and structure of breyite: The second most abundant mineral inclusion in super-deep diamonds

Earth's lower mantle most likely mainly consists of ferropericlase, bridgmanite, and a CaSiO3- phase in the perovskite structure. If separately trapped in diamonds, these phases can be transported to Earth's surface without reacting with the surrounding mantle. Although all inclusions will remain chemically pristine, only ferropericlase will stay in its original crystal structure, whereas in almost all cases bridgmanite and CaSiO3-perovskite will transform to their lower-pressure polymorphs. In the case of perovskite structured CaSiO3, the new structure that is formed is closely related to that of walstromite. This mineral is now approved by the IMA commission on new minerals and named breyite. The crystal structure is triclinic (space group: P1) with lattice parameters a0 = 6.6970(4) Å, b0 = 9.2986(7) Å, c0 = 6.6501(4) Å, α = 83.458(6)°, β = 76.226(6)°, γ = 69.581(7)°, and V = 376.72(4) Å. The major element composition found for the studied breyite is Ca3.01(2)Si2.98(2)O9. Breyite is the second most abundant mineral inclusion after ferropericlase in diamonds of super-deep origin. The occurrence of breyite has been widely presumed to be a strong indication of lower mantle (=670 km depth) or at least lower transition zone (=520 km depth) origin of both the host diamond and the inclusion suite. In this work, we demonstrate through different formation scenarios that the finding of breyite alone in a diamond is not a reliable indicator of the formation depth in the transition zone or in the lower mantle and that accompanying paragenetic phases such as ferropericlase together with MgSiO3 are needed.

Interphase REE Partitioning at the Boundary between the Earth’s Transition Zone and Lower Mantle: Evidence from Experiments and Atomistic Modeling

Trace elements play a significant role in interpretation of different processes in the deep Earth. However, the systematics of interphase rare-earth element (REE) partitioning under the conditions of the uppermost lower mantle are poorly understood. We performed high-pressure experiments to study the phase relations in key solid-phase reactions CaMgSi2O6 = CaSiO3-perovskite + MgSiO3-bridgmanite and (Mg,Fe)2SiO4-ringwoodite = (Mg,Fe)SiO3-bridgmanite + (Mg,Fe)O with addition of 1 wt % of REE oxides. Atomistic modeling was used to obtain more accurate quantitative estimates of the interphase REE partitioning and displayed the ideal model for the high-pressure minerals. HREE (Er, Tm, Yb, and Lu) are mostly accumulated in bridgmanite, while LREE are predominantly redistributed into CaSiO3. On the basis of the results of experiments and atomistic modeling, REE in bridgmanite are clearly divided into two groups (from La to Gd and from Gd to Lu). Interphase REE partition coefficients in solid-state reactions were calculated at 21.5 and 24 GPa for the first time. The new data are applicable for interpretation of the trace-element composition of the lower mantle inclusions in natural diamonds from kimberlite; the experimentally determined effect of pressure on the interphase (bridgmanite/CaSiO3-perovskite) REE partition coefficients can be a potential qualitative geobarometer for mineral inclusions in super-deep diamonds.

Breyite inclusions in diamond: experimental evidence for possible dual origin

Inclusions of breyite (previously known as walstromite-structured CaSiO3) in diamond are usually interpreted as retrogressed CaSiO3 perovskite trapped in the transition zone or the lower mantle. However, the thermodynamic stability field of breyite does not preclude its crystallization together with diamond under upper-mantle conditions (6–10 GPa). The possibility of breyite forming in subducted sedimentary material through the reaction CaCO3 + SiO2 = CaSiO3 + C + O2 was experimentally evaluated in the CaO–SiO2–C–O2 ± H2O system at 6–10 GPa, 900–1500 ∘C and oxygen fugacity 0.5–1.0 log units below the Fe–FeO (IW) buffer. One experimental series was conducted in the anhydrous subsystem and aimed at determining the melting temperature of the aragonite–coesite (or stishovite) assemblage. It was found that melting occurs at a lower temperature (∼1500 ∘C) than the decarbonation reaction, which indicates that breyite cannot be formed from aragonite and silica under anhydrous conditions and an oxygen fugacity above IW – 1. In the second experimental series, we investigated partial melting of an aragonite–coesite mixture under hydrous conditions at the same pressures and redox conditions. The melting temperature in the presence of water decreased strongly (to 900–1200 ∘C), and the melt had a hydrous silicate composition. The reduction of melt resulted in graphite crystallization in equilibrium with titanite-structured CaSi2O5 and breyite at ∼1000 ∘C. The maximum pressure of possible breyite formation is limited by the reaction CaSiO3 + SiO2 = CaSi2O5 at ∼8 GPa. Based on the experimental results, it is concluded that breyite inclusions found in natural diamond may be formed from an aragonite–coesite assemblage or carbonate melt at 6–8 GPa via reduction at high water activity.