Task shifting in dermatology: Are nurses prepared and willing?

Background: The high burden of skin diseases and the shortage of dermatologists are significant challenges in providing care to millions of people with skin diseases. Task shifting to nurses is a viable option for the delivery of dermatologic care in resource-poor settings. Satisfactory knowledge and a positive attitude are crucial for nurses to undertake the task of managing common skin diseases. This study aimed to investigate the knowledge of registered nurses and their attitude toward common skin conditions. Methods: In this descriptive, cross-sectional study, a total of 187 nurses were included from a nurses training institute by total enumeration sampling. A knowledge questionnaire and five-point Likert type-attitude scale were developed, validated, and employed to collect data. Written informed consent was obtained from the participants after approval from the institute ethics committee. Results: The mean of the knowledge scores were 10.7 ± 2.2. Nearly two thirds (62%) of the subjects demonstrated a low level of knowledge, while the remaining 38% showed a moderate level. There was no participant in the high-knowledge category. A majority of the nurses demonstrated a favorable attitude toward learning and undertaking the task of managing common skin conditions. Conclusion: We observed a low level of knowledge on diagnosing and managing common skin conditions. We recommend incorporating the relevant concepts of common skin conditions in the nursing curriculum with an emphasis on continuing education.

The Potential Emergence of “Education as Mental Health Therapy” as a Feasible Form of Teacher-Delivered Child Mental Health Care in a Low and Middle Income Country: A Mixed Methods Pragmatic Pilot Study

Objective: We assessed task-shifting children's mental health care to teachers as a potential approach to improving access to child mental health care.Methods: In Darjeeling, India, we conducted a single-arm, mixed-methods feasibility study with 19 teachers and 36 children in five rural primary schools to determine whether teachers can deliver transdiagnostic mental health care to select children-in-need with fidelity to protocol, to assess which therapeutic options teachers chose to use within the protocol, and to evaluate for a potential signal of efficacy.Results: Participation rates for intervention activities were >80%. A majority of teachers met or exceeded quality benchmarks for all intervention activities. Teachers chose to deliver teacher-centric techniques, i.e., techniques that only teachers could deliver given their role in the child's life, 80% of the time. Children improved in mental health score percentiles on the Achenbach Teacher Report Form. Key facilitators included the flexibility to adapt intervention activities to their needs, while identified barriers included limited time for care delivery.Conclusion: Findings support the feasibility of task-shifting children's mental health care to classroom teachers in resource-limited schools. Fidelity to protocol appeared feasible, though the freedom to choose and adapt therapeutic techniques may also have enhanced feasibility. Surprisingly, teachers consistently chose to deliver teacher-centric therapeutic techniques that resulted in a potential signal of efficacy. This finding supports the potential emergence of “education as mental health therapy” (Ed-MH) as a new therapy modality. Continued investigation is required to test and refine strategies for involving teachers in the delivery of transdiagnostic mental health care.

Culturally Adapted Family Intervention for People With Schizophrenia in Indonesia (FUSION): A Development and Feasibility Study Protocol

Background Mental illnesses comprise the single largest source of health-related economic burden globally and low-and middle-income countries are disproportionately affected. The majority of people with schizophrenia who need treatment do not receive it and are often wholly reliant on family caregivers for daily care and support. Family interventions have an exceptionally robust evidence base for their efficacy in high resource settings, but it is unknown whether they can produce equivalent effects in some low resource settings where cultural beliefs, explanatory models of illness and contextual socio-economic issues differ. Methods This protocol describes methods to culturally adapt and refine an evidence-based, family intervention for relatives and caregivers of people with schizophrenia in Indonesia. The feasibility and acceptability of implementing an adapted, co-produced intervention via task-shifting in primary care settings will be evaluated using the Medical Research Council framework for complex interventions. The development and preliminary testing of the adapted intervention will occur in three phases utilising mixed methods; stakeholder and key informant interviews will inform consensus workshops using nominal group techniques to develop a testable intervention. The feasibility of testing the intervention in a larger trial and the acceptability of the intervention will be explored in a feasibility trial of adapted family interventions compared to standard treatment. Participants in Phase 1 consultation groups will comprise service-users (n = 10-15), carers (n=10-15) and key stakeholders including lay and healthcare workers (n=10-15) and semi-structured interviews with key informants to identify implementation challenges and facilitators (n= 10). Phase 2 participants will include expert stakeholders including experts by experience to achieve consensus on the essential elements of the intervention (n = 20) and a separate group to develop training methods and materials for our task-shifted intervention. Phase 3 will comprise 60 carer-service-user dyads participating in a randomised feasibility trial. Discussion National healthcare policy in Indonesia supports the delivery of mental health services in a complex network of primary care centres. This study will provide important information on the feasibility of delivering family interventions for people with schizophrenia via task-shifting in primary care settings in Indonesia.

Using a theory of change to develop an integrated intervention for depression, diabetes and hypertension in Zimbabwe: lessons from the Friendship Bench project

Background Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are projected to become the leading cause of disability and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa by 2030; a vast treatment gap exists. There is a dearth of knowledge on developing evidence-based interventions that address comorbid NCDs using a task-shifting approach. The Friendship Bench, a brief psychological intervention for common mental disorders delivered by trained community grandmothers, is a promising intervention for comorbid NCDs. Although task-shifting appears to be a rational approach, evidence suggests that it may bring about tension between existing professionals from whom tasks are shifted. A Theory of Change approach is an effective way of managing the unintended tension by bringing together different stakeholders involved to build consensus on how to task shift appropriately to the parties involved. We aimed to use a theory of change approach to formulating a road map on how to successfully integrate diabetes and hypertension care into the existing Friendship Bench in order to come up with an integrated care package for depression, hypertension and diabetes aimed at strengthening NCD care in primary health care systems in Zimbabwe. Method A theory of change workshop with 18 stakeholders from diverse backgrounds was carried out in February 2020. Participants included grandmothers working on the Friendship Bench project (n = 4), policymakers from the ministry of health (n = 2), people with lived experience for the three NCDs (n = 4), health care workers (n = 2), and traditional healers (n = 2). Findings from earlier work (situational analysis, desk review, FGDs and clinic-based surveys) on the three NCDs were shared before starting the ToC. A facilitator with previous experience running ToCs led the workshop and facilitated the co-production of the ToC map. Through an iterative process, consensus between the 18 stakeholders was reached, and a causal pathway leading to developing a framework for an intervention was formulated. Results The ToC singled out the need to use expert clients (people with lived experience) to promote a patient-centred care approach that would leverage the existing Friendship Bench approach. In the face of COVID-19, the stakeholders further endorsed the use of existing digital platforms, notably WhatsApp, as an alternative way to reach out to clients and provide support. Leveraging existing community support groups as an entry point for people in need of NCD care was highlighted as a win-win by all stakeholders. A final framework for an NCD care package supported by Friendship Bench was presented to policymakers and accepted to be piloted in five geographical areas. Conclusions The ToC can be used to build consensus on how best to use using an existing intervention for common mental disorders to integrate care for diabetes and hypertension. There is a need to evaluate this new intervention through an adequately powered study.

Repackaging Primary Healthcare in Odisha: Can ‘Task Shifting’ to AYUSH Doctors Address Human Resources Deficit?

Provision of primary healthcare in India received thrust of National Health Policy 2017. Vacancy, chronic absenteeism and non-availability of allopathic doctors is a chronic problem of the public health system. Engagement of alternative human resources could get the ailing health system rid of this shortage. AYUSH doctors in Odisha are involved in clinical and public health activities since 1970s. This study aims to examine perspectives of key stakeholders on ‘task shifting’ as a possible policy alternative. We reviewed the policies and guidelines of government of Odisha on human resources deployment, recruitment, retention and terms of reference of their engagement in the public health sector. Further, 76 AYUSH doctors and 30 key informants were interviewed. Ethical clearance was obtained beforehand. Most AYUSH doctors were involved in monitoring and supervising community-based public health programmes and village-level health service providers, respectively. Their involvement in the implementation of national health programmes was found to range from 8% to 62%. A sizeable proportion of AYUSH doctors had not been trained on management of national vector borne disease control, Tuberculosis control, immunisation (RI) and disease surveillance. More than 70% of respondents showed interest in implementing and managing public health programmes. Almost all key informants recommended for improved involvement of AYUSH doctors in public health activities. Inadequate logistics support, insufficient training on public health and unequal administrative authorities was perceived to be systemic bottlenecks. Job enrichment, management capacity development, and pre-deployment orientation of AYUSH doctors may precede the opportunity of ‘task-shifting’ of public health functions.

Broadening the scope of task shifting in the organisation of healthcare

Task shifting in healthcare has mainly been initiated and studied as a way to react to/or mitigate workforce shortages. Here, we define task shifting as the structural redistribution of tasks, usually including responsibilities and competencies between different professions. As such, task shifting is commonly focused on highly specialised and trained professionals who hand-over specific, standardised tasks to professionals with lower levels of education. It is expected that this type of task shifting will lead to efficiency and cost savings to healthcare organisations. Yet, there are more benefits to task shifting, in particular its contribution to integrated patient-centred quality of care and a tailored system that meets the changing care demands in society. Hence the importance to broaden the scope of task shifting, its goals, manifestations and how task shifting plays a role in addressing both the strengths and weaknesses in the healthcare system. In this focus piece, trends and conditions for task shifting and its (un)anticipated effects are discussed. We argue that, only when designed to face specific complexities at the workplace and taking into account the balance between specialists and generalists, task shifting may substantially contribute to enhanced quality of care that meets the changing needs of society.