Production of Human Pancreatitis-Associated Protein (hPAP) in Komagataella phaffii (Pichia pastoris)

Pancreatitis-associated protein (PAP) is a pancreatic stress protein that is not produced in a healthy pancreas but is highly synthesized in pancreatic acinar cells in response to acute and chronic pancreatitis, hypoxia, toxins, diabetes, lipopolysaccharides hypotransferrinemia and organ transplantation. Changes in the PAP levels in serum are an important biological marker in the early stage of pancreatic diseases. In this study, the recombinant human PAP protein, which has the potential to be used as a diagnostic marker and as research material in proliferation, apoptosis, cell migration, cell invasion, and immunoassay studies, was expressed efficiently under the control of the AOX1 gene promoter in the Komagataella phaffii (Pichia pastoris) (K. phaffii) X33 strain. We describe the conditions required for the efficient production of PAP protein by methanol induction and its use without purification. The produced unpurified protein was tested in sandwich ELISA and showed consistent results with the commercial product. These results are encouraging that the protein produced can be used as a biomarker standard in ELISA tests without the cost and labor of purification.

Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening in Austria Using PAP and the Numeric Product of PAP and IRT Concentrations as Second-Tier Parameters

In Austria, newborns have been screened for cystic fibrosis (CF) by analyzing immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) from dried blood spots (DBS)s for nearly 20 years. Recently, pancreatitis-associated protein (PAP) analysis was introduced as a second-tier test with the aim of reducing recalls for second DBS cards while keeping sensitivity high. For 28 months, when IRT was elevated (65–130 ng/mL), PAP was measured from the first DBS (n = 198,927) with a two-step cut-off applied. For the last 12 months of the observation period (n = 85,421), an additional IRT×PAP cut-off was introduced. If PAP or IRT×PAP were above cut-off, a second card was analyzed for IRT and in case of elevated values identified as screen-positive. Above 130 ng/mL IRT in the first DBS, newborns were classified as screen-positive. IRT analysis of first DBS resulted in 1961 (1%) tests for PAP. In the first 16 months, 26 of 93 screen-positive were confirmed to have CF. Two false-negatives have been reported (sensitivity = 92.8%). Importantly, less than 30% of families compared to the previous IRT-IRT screening scheme had to be contacted causing distress. Adding IRT×PAP caused a marginally increased number of second cards and sweat tests to be requested during this period (15 and 3, respectively) compared to the initial IRT-PAP scheme. One case of confirmed CF was found due to IRT×PAP, demonstrating an increase in sensitivity. Thus, the relatively simple and economical algorithm presented here performs effectively and may be a useful model for inclusion of CF into NBS panels or modification of existing schemes.

Pancreatitis-Associated Protein in Neonatal Screening for Cystic Fibrosis: Strengths and Weaknesses

There are currently four countries and one local region in Europe that use PAP in their newborn screening programme. The first country to employ PAP at a national level was the Netherlands, which started using IRT/PAP/DNA/EGA in 2011. Germany followed in 2016 with a slightly different IRT/PAP/DNA strategy. Portugal also started in 2016, but with an IRT/PAP/IRT programme, and in 2017, Austria changed its IRT/IRT protocol to an IRT/PAP/IRT program. In 2018, Catalonia started to use an IRT/PAP/IRT/DNA strategy. The strengths of PAP are the avoidance of carrier detection and a lower detection rate of CFSPID. PAP seems to have advantages in detecting CF in ethnically-diverse populations, as it is a biochemical approach to screening, which looks for pancreatic injury. Compared to an IRT/IRT protocol, an IRT/PAP protocol leads to earlier diagnoses. While PAP can be assessed with the same screening card as the first IRT, the second IRT in an IRT/IRT protocol requires a second heel prick around the 21st day of the patient’s life. However, IRT/PAP has two main weaknesses. First, an IRT/PAP protocol seems to have a lower sensitivity compared to a well-functioning IRT/DNA protocol, and second, IRT/PAP that is performed as a purely biochemical protocol has a very low positive predictive value. However, if the advantages of PAP are to be exploited, a combination of IRT/PAP with genetic screening or a second IRT as a third tier could be an alternative for a sufficiently performing CF-NBS protocol.