intense sweetener
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

22
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

12
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
A. J. Gokhale ◽  
A. M. Patel ◽  
J. M. Mallik ◽  
H. G. Patel

Dietetic functional Basundi was manufactured by employing low fat milk (1.5 per cent) with WPC and blend of stabilizer as fat replacer; Sucrose was replaced with intense sweetener sucralose and the bulk of sucrose was replaced with different combination of blend of polydextrose, maltodextrin and sorbitol as bulking ingredients. Replacement of sucrose with intense sweetener and combination of bulking ingredients did not affect compositional and physico-chemical attributes however a non-significant rise in 5’HMF content was observed with increase in ploydextrose content in the bulking ingredients’ blend. Viscosity followed the similar trend that was noted for 5’HMF. In sensory attributes body and texture and flavour score had significant impact of replacement of sucrose. Polydextrose in the blend when increased to more than 9.0 percent, it increased the body and texture and flavour score significantly, however such increase was non-significant for body and texture score, while flavour score decreased non-significantly. Overall acceptability score followed the similar trend observed for body and texture score. Polydextrose: Maltodextrin: Sorbitol in the proportion of 12:01:03 was considered best because of creamier body with polydextrose and sorbitol being more laxative at increased proportions. 


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
D Austys ◽  
R Stukas ◽  
V Dobrovolskij ◽  
R Arlauskas

Abstract Background In connection with attempts to reduce consumption of added sugar, consumption of non-nutritive (or low caloric) sweeteners (NNS) is likely to increse in many countries. In addition to variety of NNS, limited evidence on public health effects related to NNS exist. Thus, it remains important to monitor consumption of added sugar and sweeteners in our societies. As Lithuania and Poland are neighbor countries with similar culture and nutritional habits, the objective of this study was to compare consumption of sweeteners among adults in Lithuania and Poland. Methods A representative sample of Lithuanian population of adults aged 18 to 75 years was formed. A total number of 1008 residents from Lithuania participated. Distribution of them by answers about consumption of added sugar and sweeteners was assessed with respect to results of the survey conducted in central part of Poland where a group of 2000 adult respondents was investigated. Results Majority of respondents in both countries declared consumption of added sugar: 79.3% and 87.4% of Lithuanian and Polish respondents, respectively (p-value less than 0.05). Apart from sugar, majority of the respondents in Lithuania declared consumption of honey or fructose (respectively, 78.1% and 43.4%), consumption of other sweeteners such as saccharin, stevia, corn syrup, aspartame and sucralose were less prevalent (respectively, 30.9%, 18.2%, 9.5%, 9.0%, 3.4%). In Poland, 41.8% of respondents declared consumption of products containing stevia. Distribution of Poles by answers to the question which sweetener they used most often was 26.6%, 23.6%, 15.6%, 12.3% for stevia, xylitol, aspartame and fructose, respectively. Honey, acesulfame K, thaumatin and other substances were used by a lower percentage of Polish respondents. Conclusions Despite cultural similarities consumption of added sugar and sweeteners among adults differed significantly in two neighbor counties: Lithuania and Poland. Key messages In comparison to Lithuania, consumption of added sugar, xylitol and natural non-nutritive but intense sweetener stevia was more prevalent in Poland. In comparison to Poland, consumption of added sugar was less prevalent, but non-intense and high in calories sweeteners were more prevalent in Lithuania.


2018 ◽  
Vol 536 (2) ◽  
pp. 517-518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xavier Parissaux ◽  
Amandine Druon ◽  
Wagner Agnès ◽  
Philippe Lefèvre

2012 ◽  
Vol 438 ◽  
pp. 510-516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Knut Erik Tollefsen ◽  
Luca Nizzetto ◽  
Duane B. Huggett

2011 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 673-681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Lillicrap ◽  
Katherine Langford ◽  
Knut Erik Tollefsen

2009 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. 1152-1168 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. F. García Jiménez ◽  
M. C. Valencia ◽  
L. F. Capitán-Vallvey

2006 ◽  
Vol 385 (2) ◽  
pp. 385-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. F. Capitán-Vallvey ◽  
M. C. Valencia ◽  
E. Arana Nicolás ◽  
J. F. García-Jiménez

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document