Digital nomadism is a term that has entered the cultural lexicon
relatively recently to describe a lifestyle unbound from the traditional structures and
constraints of office work (Makimoto and Manners, 1997; Cook, 2020; Thompson, 2018). This
identity is organized around the digital technologies and infrastructures that make “remote
work” possible, allowing digital nomads to claim “location independence” and granting them
the freedom to travel while working (Nash et al., 2018). Largely employed as freelancers or
as self-styled entrepreneurs, digital nomads assert their independence from the traditional
strictures of work through the digital technologies they use at the same time that they
remain “plugged in” to the infrastructures, economies, and lifeworlds of Silicon Valley
(McElroy, 2019, p. 216). As such, the digital nomad represents a key site to examine
privileged transnationalism and the enduring forms of coloniality that inform contemporary
“regimes of mobility” (Hayes and Pérez-Gañán, 2017; Glick Schiller and Salazar, 2013, p.
189). This paper considers how discourses of digital nomadism have been constructed,
circulated, and leveraged by governments offering “digital nomad visas,” “remote work
visas,” or “freelancer visas” to examine how regimes of mobility have been imagined and
enacted. Utilizing discourse analysis to examine popular press articles, Instagram posts
from the official accounts of tourism boards, and governmental websites, I examine the ways
digital nomadism was constructed during the COVID-19 pandemic and consider how this
lifestyle has been formalized and institutionalized. I argue that mobility itself has become
a central resource through which nations compete for global capital accumulation.