Mismatch Repair: From Preserving Genome Stability to Enabling Mutation Studies in Real-Time Single Cells

Mismatch Repair (MMR) is an important and conserved keeper of the maintenance of genetic information. Miroslav Radman’s contributions to the field of MMR are multiple and tremendous. One of the most notable was to provide, along with Bob Wagner and Matthew Meselson, the first direct evidence for the existence of the methyl-directed MMR. The purpose of this review is to outline several aspects and biological implications of MMR that his work has helped unveil, including the role of MMR during replication and recombination editing, and the current understanding of its mechanism. The review also summarizes recent discoveries related to the visualization of MMR components and discusses how it has helped shape our understanding of the coupling of mismatch recognition to replication. Finally, the author explains how visualization of MMR components has paved the way to the study of spontaneous mutations in living cells in real time.

Mispair-bound human MutS–MutL complex triggers DNA incisions and activates mismatch repair

DNA mismatch repair (MMR) relies on MutS and MutL ATPases for mismatch recognition and strand-specific nuclease recruitment to remove mispaired bases in daughter strands. However, whether the MutS–MutL complex coordinates MMR by ATP-dependent sliding on DNA or protein–protein interactions between the mismatch and strand discrimination signal is ambiguous. Using functional MMR assays and systems preventing proteins from sliding, we show that sliding of human MutSα is required not for MMR initiation, but for final mismatch removal. MutSα recruits MutLα to form a mismatch-bound complex, which initiates MMR by nicking the daughter strand 5′ to the mismatch. Exonuclease 1 (Exo1) is then recruited to the nick and conducts 5′ → 3′ excision. ATP-dependent MutSα dissociation from the mismatch is necessary for Exo1 to remove the mispaired base when the excision reaches the mismatch. Therefore, our study has resolved a long-standing puzzle, and provided new insights into the mechanism of MMR initiation and mispair removal.

Importance of base-pair opening for mismatch recognition

Mismatch repair is a highly conserved cellular pathway responsible for repairing mismatched dsDNA. Errors are detected by the MutS enzyme, which most likely senses altered mechanical property of damaged dsDNA rather than a specific molecular pattern. While the curved shape of dsDNA in crystallographic MutS/DNA structures suggests the role of DNA bending, the theoretical support is not fully convincing. Here, we present a computational study focused on a base-pair opening into the minor groove, a specific base-pair motion observed upon interaction with MutS. Propensities for the opening were evaluated in terms of two base-pair parameters: Opening and Shear. We tested all possible base pairs in anti/anti, anti/syn and syn/anti orientations and found clear discrimination between mismatches and canonical base-pairs only for the opening into the minor groove. Besides, the discrimination gap was also confirmed in hotspot and coldspot sequences, indicating that the opening could play a more significant role in the mismatch recognition than previously recognized. Our findings can be helpful for a better understanding of sequence-dependent mutability. Further, detailed structural characterization of mismatches can serve for designing anti-cancer drugs targeting mismatched base pairs.

Recurrent mismatch binding by MutS mobile clamps on DNA localizes repair complexes nearby

DNA mismatch repair (MMR), the guardian of the genome, commences when MutS identifies a mismatch and recruits MutL to nick the error-containing strand, allowing excision and DNA resynthesis. Dominant MMR models posit that after mismatch recognition, ATP converts MutS to a hydrolysis-independent, diffusive mobile clamp that no longer recognizes the mismatch. Little is known about the postrecognition MutS mobile clamp and its interactions with MutL. Two disparate frameworks have been proposed: One in which MutS–MutL complexes remain mobile on the DNA, and one in which MutL stops MutS movement. Here we use single-molecule FRET to follow the postrecognition states of MutS and the impact of MutL on its properties. In contrast to current thinking, we find that after the initial mobile clamp formation event, MutS undergoes frequent cycles of mismatch rebinding and mobile clamp reformation without releasing DNA. Notably, ATP hydrolysis is required to alter the conformation of MutS such that it can recognize the mismatch again instead of bypassing it; thus, ATP hydrolysis licenses the MutS mobile clamp to rebind the mismatch. Moreover, interaction with MutL can both trap MutS at the mismatch en route to mobile clamp formation and stop movement of the mobile clamp on DNA. MutS’s frequent rebinding of the mismatch, which increases its residence time in the vicinity of the mismatch, coupled with MutL’s ability to trap MutS, should increase the probability that MutS–MutL MMR initiation complexes localize near the mismatch.

Controlling the hypermutation: Exploitation of the MutS protein in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections commonly develop in individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF), and its adaptation in such an unfavourable condition is always found to be related to hypermutation. In fact, most of the hypermutation is due to the defects in mutS gene which involves in the mismatch repair mechanism, causing the acceleration of mutation rate and adaptive evolution. In order to rheostatically express the MutS protein and achieve “hypomutation” (in which the rate of mutation is lower than that of wild type strain), an exogenous mutS gene with rhamnose-inducible promoter was cloned into MPAO1 mutS::Tn mutant strain. Present findings demonstrate that this system is tightly-controlled and stable, with less rifampicin-resistant mutant frequency and more fluorescence intensity from a GFP-tagged MutS expressing cells were observed when the concentration of the inducer increases. Interestingly, the results from Western blot analysis show that less MutS protein is required to suppress hypermutation in the wild type strain, as compared to our construct that behaves similar to the wild type but obviously needs more MutS expression to achieve such state. This indicates that the exogenous MutS might be lacking of other important protein to work efficiently in mismatch recognition. Therefore, based on our cDNA analysis, we found that fdxA gene next to the mutS gene is in the same operon, which could suggest that they might be functionally related in the DNA repair machinery.

Sequence specificity, energetics and mechanism of mismatch recognition by DNA damage sensing protein Rad4/XPC

The ultraviolet (UV) radiation-induced DNA lesions play a causal role in many prevalent genetic skin-related diseases and cancers. The damage sensing protein Rad4/XPC specifically recognizes and repairs these lesions with high fidelity and safeguards genome integrity. Despite considerable progress, the mechanistic details of the mode of action of Rad4/XPC in damage recognition remain obscure. The present study investigates the mechanism, energetics, dynamics, and the molecular basis for the sequence specificity of mismatch recognition by Rad4/XPC. We dissect the following three key molecular events that occur as Rad4/XPC tries to recognize and bind to DNA lesions/mismatches: (a) the association of Rad4/XPC with the damaged/mismatched DNA, (b) the insertion of a lesion-sensing β-hairpin of Rad4/XPC into the damage/mismatch site and (c) the flipping of a pair of nucleotide bases at the damage/mismatch site. Using suitable reaction coordinates, the free energy surfaces for these events are determined using molecular dynamics (MD) and umbrella sampling simulations on three mismatched (CCC/CCC, TTT/TTT and TAT/TAT mismatches) Rad4-DNA complexes. The study identifies the key determinants of the sequence-dependent specificity of Rad4 for the mismatches and explores the ramifications of specificity in the aforementioned events. The results unravel the molecular basis for the high specificity of Rad4 towards CCC/CCC mismatch and lower specificity for the TAT/TAT mismatch. A strong correlation between the depth of β-hairpin insertion into the DNA duplex and the degree of coupling between the hairpin insertion and the flipping of bases is also observed. The interplay of the conformational flexibility of mismatched bases, the depth of β-hairpin insertion, Rad4-DNA association energetics and the Rad4 specificity explored here complement recent experimental FRET studies on Rad4-DNA complexes.

Human MutLγ, the MLH1–MLH3 heterodimer, is an endonuclease that promotes DNA expansion

MutL proteins are ubiquitous and play important roles in DNA metabolism. MutLγ (MLH1–MLH3 heterodimer) is a poorly understood member of the eukaryotic family of MutL proteins that has been implicated in triplet repeat expansion, but its action in this deleterious process has remained unknown. In humans, triplet repeat expansion is the molecular basis for ∼40 neurological disorders. In addition to MutLγ, triplet repeat expansion involves the mismatch recognition factor MutSβ (MSH2–MSH3 heterodimer). We show here that human MutLγ is an endonuclease that nicks DNA. Strikingly, incision of covalently closed, relaxed loop-containing DNA by human MutLγ is promoted by MutSβ and targeted to the strand opposite the loop. The resulting strand break licenses downstream events that lead to a DNA expansion event in human cell extracts. Our data imply that the mammalian MutLγ is a unique endonuclease that can initiate triplet repeat DNA expansions.

Mismatch Recognition by Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2-Msh6: Role of Structure and Dynamics

The mismatch repair (MMR) pathway maintains genome integrity by correcting errors such as mismatched base pairs formed during DNA replication. In MMR, Msh2–Msh6, a heterodimeric protein, targets single base mismatches and small insertion/deletion loops for repair. By incorporating the fluorescent nucleoside base analog 6-methylisoxanthopterin (6-MI) at or adjacent to a mismatch site to probe the structural and dynamic elements of the mismatch, we address how Msh2–Msh6 recognizes these mismatches for repair within the context of matched DNA. Fluorescence quantum yield and rotational correlation time measurements indicate that local base dynamics linearly correlate with Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2–Msh6 binding affinity where the protein exhibits a higher affinity (KD ≤ 25 nM) for mismatches that have a significant amount of dynamic motion. Energy transfer measurements measuring global DNA bending find that mismatches that are both well and poorly recognized by Msh2–Msh6 experience the same amount of protein-induced bending. Finally, base-specific dynamics coupled with protein-induced blue shifts in peak emission strongly support the crystallographic model of directional binding, in which Phe 432 of Msh6 intercalates 3′ of the mismatch. These results imply an important role for local base dynamics in the initial recognition step of MMR.

Effective mismatch repair depends on timely control of PCNA retention on DNA by the Elg1 complex

Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) is a sliding clamp that acts as a central co-ordinator for mismatch repair (MMR) as well as DNA replication. Loss of Elg1, the major subunit of the PCNA unloader complex, causes over-accumulation of PCNA on DNA and also increases mutation rate, but it has been unclear if the two effects are linked. Here we show that timely removal of PCNA from DNA by the Elg1 complex is important to prevent mutations. Although premature unloading of PCNA generally increases mutation rate, the mutator phenotype of elg1Δ is attenuated by PCNA mutants PCNA-R14E and PCNA-D150E that spontaneously fall off DNA. In contrast, the elg1Δ mutator phenotype is exacerbated by PCNA mutants that accumulate on DNA due to enhanced electrostatic PCNA–DNA interactions. Epistasis analysis suggests that PCNA over-accumulation on DNA interferes with both MMR and MMR-independent process(es). In elg1Δ, over-retained PCNA hyper-recruits the Msh2–Msh6 mismatch recognition complex through its PCNA-interacting peptide motif, causing accumulation of MMR intermediates. Our results suggest that PCNA retention controlled by the Elg1 complex is critical for efficient MMR: PCNA needs to be on DNA long enough to enable MMR, but if it is retained too long it interferes with downstream repair steps.