interest reason
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

7
(FIVE YEARS 4)

H-INDEX

0
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 41
Author(s):  
Erika Dewi Anggraeni ◽  
Syarif Imam Hidayat ◽  
Indra Tjahaja Amir

Indonesia has great potential in the development of the agribusiness sector. One of the sectors that can be developed is the livestock sector. Milk is one of the livestock products that are consumed daily by the community. In 2019, Indonesia's milk consumption was recorded at 16.23 liters/capita/year. Indonesia's milk consumption is still relatively low compared to Singapore and Malaysia. This study aims to determine public perception of milk and milk consumption, and public interest in milk consumption. Data were obtained from interviews through questionnaires and analyzed using descriptive analysis. The results showed that 65.6% of respondents chose a positive view of milk, 57.43% of respondents had a positive view of milk consumption and 74.16% of respondents had a positive opinion of the benefits of milk. There are 40% of respondents who have a moderate purchase frequency, 73.3% of respondents have a low consumption frequency and 61.7% of respondents have a low milk consumption measure.Keywords: Milk, Public Perception, Public Interest, Reason


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-33
Author(s):  
Kiki Astuti Wulandary Sutin

Penelitian ini bertujuan; Pertama mengetahui penerapan pengesampingan perkara dalam memenuhi adanya kepentingan umum, dan Kedua mengkaji dampak yang ditimbulkan dengan tidak adanya instrumen hukum untuk melakukan perlawanan terhadap keputusan pengesampingkan perkara demi kepentingan umum. Penelitian ini merupakan tipe penelitian normative dengan menggunakan pendekatan undang-undang, pendekatan kasus, pendekatan perbandingan, dan pendekatan konseptual.  Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan: Pertama Pengesampingan perkara terhadap perkara Abraham Samad dan Bambang Widjojanto dengan pertimbangan Jaksa Agung belum menunjukkan terganggunya kepentingan umum secara nyata; Kedua Tidak ditemukan adanya mekanisme untuk melakukan perlawanan atau upaya hukum terhadap keputusan pengesampingan perkara oleh Jaksa Agung sebagai bentuk kebebasan kebijaksanaan (beleidvrijheid) menimbulkan dampak yakni, keputusan pengesampingan perkara oleh Jaksa Agung bersifat final dan mengikat (final and binding),tidak mengakomodir hak-hak korban kejahatan sesuai prinsip perlakuan yang sama di hadapan hukum, dan kewenangan tersebut rawan terhadap penyalahgunaan kekuasaan. The study aims to : (1) describe the public interest that becomes the basis of a general attorney in dismissing a case; (2) explain the implementation of dismissing a case to fulfill the public interest reason; and (3) analyze the impact caused by the absence of law instrumen againts the decision of dismissing a case for public interest. This research was a normative study usinglegal approach, case approach, comparative approach, and conceptual approach. It was conducted atthe Provincial Attorney General’s Office of South Sulawesi. The results show that:(1) In the dismissing of a case, public interest indicates the existence of state’s interest and community interest. This is in line with the explanation of article 35 letter c of the Act Number16 of 2004 that have to. The scope is broadand there is no standard in defining the public interest. Therefore, it needs to be considered within the context of state’s constitutional principleaccording to the Preamble of 1945 Constitution. (2) The dismissing of the case of Abraham Samad and Bambang Widjojanto with the consideration of Attorney General have not indicatedthe disturbance of public interest. (3) There is no anymechanism to appealagaints the general attorney’s decision to dismiss a case as a form of wisdom (beleidvrijheid), which caused some impacts namely the decision of general attorney to dismiss a case is final and binding, does not accommodate the rights of victims according to the principle of equality before the law, and vulnerable to abuse of power. 


Author(s):  
Shanthi D L

<p>In the current era of wireless sensor network development, among the various challenging issues, the life enhancement has obtained the prime interest. Reason is clear and straight: the battery operated sensors do have limited period of life hence to keep the network active as much as possible, life of network should be larger. To enhance the life of the network, at different level different approaches has been applied, broadly defining the proper scheduling<br />of sensors and defining the energy efficient communication. In this paper heuristic based energy efficient communication approch has applied. A new development in the Genetic algorithm has presented and called as Dominant Genetic algorithm to determine the optimum energy efficient routing path between sensor nodes and to define the optimal energy efficient trajectory for mobile data gathering node. Dominancy of high fitness solution has included<br />in the Genetic algorithm because of its natural existence. The proposed solution has applied the connection oriented crossover and mutation operator to maintain the feasibility of generated solution. With various simulation experiments it has observed that proposed method not only has delivered the better solution but also very less number of iterations required as<br />compared to conventional form of Genetic algorithm.</p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (253) ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
Hubert Lepargneur

Em 1998, o Papa João Paulo II publicou a Carta encíclica Fides et Ratio, “sobre as relações entre fé e razão”. Compreensivelmente, ele entendeu por “razão” a produção filosófica, exclusivamente. De fato, os representantes da fé católica tiveram de avaliar, durante quase dois milênios, a produção filosófica, a fim de avaliar seu impacto sobre a fé dos fiéis e, eventualmente, contestá-la para a defesa desta fé. Atualmente, entretanto, em todos os meios, o interesse e o impacto da razão sobre a fé vêm mais da produção científica, porque nunca a tecnociência tinha sido tão fecunda como hoje e, aos olhos de não poucos, com frutos contestáveis. Enquanto a reflexão teológica sobre “fé e filosofia” é abundante, a reflexão teológica sobre “fé e ciência” permanece escassa. Este artigo tenta contribuir para preencher esta lacuna com a documentação, a prudência e o realismo desejáveis, sem a pretensão de esgotar o assunto.Abstract: In 1998, Pope John Paul the Second published the encyclical letter Fides et Ratio, “about the relationship between faith and reason”. Understandably, he saw reason exclusively as philosophical production. In fact, in order to assess the impact of the philosophical production on the faithful and, eventually, dispute it in defense of the faith, the representatives of the Catholic faith have had to take it into consideration for almost two millennia. Now, however, in all the various milieus, the interest reason has for the faith and its impact on the faithful come more often from the scientific production because never has the techno-science been as productive as it is today even if, in the eyes of many, with controversial results. While the theological reflection about “faith and philosophy” is plentiful, the theological reflection on “faith and science” remains scarce. This article attempts to fill this gap with the required documentation, caution, and realism, but it does not claim to have exhausted the subject.


Author(s):  
Yennita Asriyani ◽  
Karona Cahya Susena

Land and building tax was one of taxes which was potentially to be explored as revenue source. Tax revenue was really determined from taxpayers obedience in running their responsibility in tax field. This researchwas aimed at explaining the effect of income rate, taxpayer knowledge, Service Quality, Taxpayers Awareness, and Tax Punishment in influencing tax payers obedience in paying rural and urbam land and building tax. The study was located at Teluk Segars district in Bengkulu city. The method used in this research was quantitative research, by using questionnaire as the instrument which was spread out to 91 rural and urban land and building tax, tax payers at Teluk Segara district. Data  analyzing in this study used rating scale and likert scale analysis. The result of this research showed that one of indicators, namely taxpayers knowledge, gained the highest score is 367 . It meant that the indicator could influence taxpayers obedience, but it was not the factor that was able to make taxpayers obedient to pay land and building tax because of private interest reason. The indicator which gained the lowest score is 171 was income rate which meant it could not influence taxpayers obedience because land and building tax rate was relatively cheap and achievable by them to pay.  Key Words: Income Rate, Taxpayer Knowledge, Service Quality, Taxpayer Awareness, Tax Punishment , Taxpayer Compliance


2016 ◽  
pp. 99-121
Author(s):  
Asmuni

The research discusses the issues that emerge from executing the postponement stipulation of the administrative decision implementation and the concept of regulating the execution of postponement stipulation of the administrative decision implementation that can protect the interests of litigants. The research constitutes a normatively legal research. The used approach is the conceptual and statute approaches. The result of the research shows that postponing the administrative decision implementation makes applicable power of the sued administrative decision suspended temporarily; postponing the administrative decision implementation makes legal circumstances back to the first position, prior to the administrative decision disputed; and postponing the administrative decision implementation restricts to apply the principle of the legal presumption. Due to the influence of the postponement stipulation of the administrative decision implementation, it is necessary to put philosophically and theoretically and juridically legal reasons on the judge decision. The public interest reason is not required, because the administrative decision on the public interest has not become the State Administrative Court authority since the first time. The legal instruments used to postpone the execution of the administrative decision is an interlocutory decision not stipulation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document