Is habitat enhancement a viable strategy for conserving New Zealand's endemic lizards?

<p>In our current era, the Anthropocene, species are disappearing at an unprecedented rate due to the impact of humans on Earth’s environments. Of the many causes of these extinctions, habitat loss is thought to be the most severe. Three habitat management strategies are available for halting habitat loss: reservation, restoration and reconciliation. The latter two of these strategies actively seek to improve the ability of degraded or lost habitats to support species. If successful on a large enough scale, use of restoration and reconciliation (hereafter referred to collectively as ‘habitat enhancement’) could reverse the effects of habitat loss. I evaluated the viability of habitat enhancement for the conservation of New Zealand’s lizard fauna. 83% of New Zealand’s 106+ endemic species are threatened or at risk of extinction. While habitat loss is one key driver of declines, predation by invasive mammals is the other. Neither of these processes are well understood. Habitat enhancement is increasingly being employed in New Zealand by landowners, community groups, conservationists, and businesses as a strategy for mitigating lizard declines, but outcomes are rarely investigated comprehensively. This is concerning because habitat manipulation potentially affects both exotic and native species, which has led to unexpected negative effects on threatened fauna in New Zealand and overseas. I posed four questions to help address this knowledge gap. (1) What habitat enhancement strategies are available for reptiles, and have they produced successful conservation outcomes? (2) How do habitat characteristics affect populations and communities of endemic New Zealand lizards? (3) How does the presence of invasive mammals affect populations and communities of endemic New Zealand lizards over intermediate to long-term time frames? (4) Can habitat enhancement produce positive conservation outcomes in the presence of invasive mammals? A review of the global literature on habitat enhancement for reptiles identified 75 studies documenting 577 responses of 251 reptile species. For outcome evaluation, I adapted an existing stage-based framework for assessment of translocation success. High levels of success (84-85%) at Stages 1 (use of enhanced habitat) and 2 (evidence of reproduction in enhanced habitat) suggested that enhancement could be useful for creating areas that can be inhabited, and reproduced in, by reptiles. Fewer cases were successful at Stage 3 (30%; improvement of at least one demographic parameter demonstrated in enhanced habitat) or Stage 4 (43%; self-sustaining or source population established in enhanced habitat). Additionally, only 1% of the 577 cases sufficiently examined or modelled long-term population trends to allow evaluation against the Stage 4 criterion. Thus, there was a lack of evidence indicating that enhancement could result in higher population growth rates, or reduced extinction risk, of reptiles. I conducted field work in the Wellington region to investigate the effects of habitat characteristics and mammals on terrestrial lizards inhabiting coastal environments. Surveys conducted in two mammal-invaded mainland areas and on two mammal-free offshore islands showed that presence or absence of invasive mammals had a stronger effect on lizard community structure than habitat variables. However, occupancy probabilities of northern grass skinks Oligosoma polychroma and Raukawa geckos Woodworthia maculata were positively correlated with increasing cover of divaricating shrubs. O. polychroma were also more likely to occupy patches with increasing cover by non-Muehlenbeckia vines. Mark-recapture studies were conducted at two mammal-invaded mainland sites to investigate the current abundance of lizard species: Turakirae Head and Pukerua Bay. Estimated densities of O. polychroma ranged between 3,980 and 4,078 individuals / ha and W. maculata between 4,067 and 38,372 individuals / ha. Other species known to occur, at least historically, at each site were either not detected or comprised only a small proportion of total lizard captures. Analysis of longitudinal lizard monitoring data available for Pukerua Bay, Turakirae Head, and an additional mammal-invaded site, Baring Head, did not reveal a significant decline in abundance, occupancy, or catch rates of O. polychroma over time periods ranging between six and 34 years, nor of W. maculata over six to 49 years. Habitat information available for Baring Head showed that the probability of local extinction of W. maculata was significantly lower at rocky sites. Finally, I conducted a before-after-control-impact habitat enhancement experiment on lizard communities inhabiting 100 m2 plots on the mammal-invaded Miramar Peninsula. After a six-month pre-enhancement monitoring period, native plants and gravel piles were added to enhancement plots and lizard monitoring continued for a further nine months. Enhancement did not significantly affect plot use, body condition, or evidence of reproduction in Oligosoma aeneum, O. polychroma or W. maculata, but were considered successful at Stages 1 and 2 due to the absence of a negative effect. Neither the abundance, probability of entry into plots by birth or immigration, nor apparent survival of O. aeneum was significantly affected by enhancement (Stage 3). Apparent survival of O. polychroma increased significantly in response to enhancement, but this did not result in increased abundance. Adding gravel and native vegetation (especially divaricating shrubs and vines) may be a suitable strategy for creating habitat in invaded coastal landscapes for O. polychroma and W. maculata. However, most of the other lizard species that would have historically occurred in mammal-invaded coastal areas of Wellington appeared to be sensitive to sustained mammal presence, even with low-to-moderate levels of control in operation. Therefore, habitat enhancement without intensive mammal control or eradication is not expected to benefit these species, nor be capable of restoring coastal lizard communities. In invaded landscapes it is, at best, a reconciliation measure that could allow co-existence of an endemic lizard community comprised of common species with invasive mammals. However, habitat enhancement could still be useful for restoring lizard communities in mammal-free sanctuaries.</p>

Is habitat enhancement a viable strategy for conserving New Zealand's endemic lizards?

<p>In our current era, the Anthropocene, species are disappearing at an unprecedented rate due to the impact of humans on Earth’s environments. Of the many causes of these extinctions, habitat loss is thought to be the most severe. Three habitat management strategies are available for halting habitat loss: reservation, restoration and reconciliation. The latter two of these strategies actively seek to improve the ability of degraded or lost habitats to support species. If successful on a large enough scale, use of restoration and reconciliation (hereafter referred to collectively as ‘habitat enhancement’) could reverse the effects of habitat loss. I evaluated the viability of habitat enhancement for the conservation of New Zealand’s lizard fauna. 83% of New Zealand’s 106+ endemic species are threatened or at risk of extinction. While habitat loss is one key driver of declines, predation by invasive mammals is the other. Neither of these processes are well understood. Habitat enhancement is increasingly being employed in New Zealand by landowners, community groups, conservationists, and businesses as a strategy for mitigating lizard declines, but outcomes are rarely investigated comprehensively. This is concerning because habitat manipulation potentially affects both exotic and native species, which has led to unexpected negative effects on threatened fauna in New Zealand and overseas. I posed four questions to help address this knowledge gap. (1) What habitat enhancement strategies are available for reptiles, and have they produced successful conservation outcomes? (2) How do habitat characteristics affect populations and communities of endemic New Zealand lizards? (3) How does the presence of invasive mammals affect populations and communities of endemic New Zealand lizards over intermediate to long-term time frames? (4) Can habitat enhancement produce positive conservation outcomes in the presence of invasive mammals? A review of the global literature on habitat enhancement for reptiles identified 75 studies documenting 577 responses of 251 reptile species. For outcome evaluation, I adapted an existing stage-based framework for assessment of translocation success. High levels of success (84-85%) at Stages 1 (use of enhanced habitat) and 2 (evidence of reproduction in enhanced habitat) suggested that enhancement could be useful for creating areas that can be inhabited, and reproduced in, by reptiles. Fewer cases were successful at Stage 3 (30%; improvement of at least one demographic parameter demonstrated in enhanced habitat) or Stage 4 (43%; self-sustaining or source population established in enhanced habitat). Additionally, only 1% of the 577 cases sufficiently examined or modelled long-term population trends to allow evaluation against the Stage 4 criterion. Thus, there was a lack of evidence indicating that enhancement could result in higher population growth rates, or reduced extinction risk, of reptiles. I conducted field work in the Wellington region to investigate the effects of habitat characteristics and mammals on terrestrial lizards inhabiting coastal environments. Surveys conducted in two mammal-invaded mainland areas and on two mammal-free offshore islands showed that presence or absence of invasive mammals had a stronger effect on lizard community structure than habitat variables. However, occupancy probabilities of northern grass skinks Oligosoma polychroma and Raukawa geckos Woodworthia maculata were positively correlated with increasing cover of divaricating shrubs. O. polychroma were also more likely to occupy patches with increasing cover by non-Muehlenbeckia vines. Mark-recapture studies were conducted at two mammal-invaded mainland sites to investigate the current abundance of lizard species: Turakirae Head and Pukerua Bay. Estimated densities of O. polychroma ranged between 3,980 and 4,078 individuals / ha and W. maculata between 4,067 and 38,372 individuals / ha. Other species known to occur, at least historically, at each site were either not detected or comprised only a small proportion of total lizard captures. Analysis of longitudinal lizard monitoring data available for Pukerua Bay, Turakirae Head, and an additional mammal-invaded site, Baring Head, did not reveal a significant decline in abundance, occupancy, or catch rates of O. polychroma over time periods ranging between six and 34 years, nor of W. maculata over six to 49 years. Habitat information available for Baring Head showed that the probability of local extinction of W. maculata was significantly lower at rocky sites. Finally, I conducted a before-after-control-impact habitat enhancement experiment on lizard communities inhabiting 100 m2 plots on the mammal-invaded Miramar Peninsula. After a six-month pre-enhancement monitoring period, native plants and gravel piles were added to enhancement plots and lizard monitoring continued for a further nine months. Enhancement did not significantly affect plot use, body condition, or evidence of reproduction in Oligosoma aeneum, O. polychroma or W. maculata, but were considered successful at Stages 1 and 2 due to the absence of a negative effect. Neither the abundance, probability of entry into plots by birth or immigration, nor apparent survival of O. aeneum was significantly affected by enhancement (Stage 3). Apparent survival of O. polychroma increased significantly in response to enhancement, but this did not result in increased abundance. Adding gravel and native vegetation (especially divaricating shrubs and vines) may be a suitable strategy for creating habitat in invaded coastal landscapes for O. polychroma and W. maculata. However, most of the other lizard species that would have historically occurred in mammal-invaded coastal areas of Wellington appeared to be sensitive to sustained mammal presence, even with low-to-moderate levels of control in operation. Therefore, habitat enhancement without intensive mammal control or eradication is not expected to benefit these species, nor be capable of restoring coastal lizard communities. In invaded landscapes it is, at best, a reconciliation measure that could allow co-existence of an endemic lizard community comprised of common species with invasive mammals. However, habitat enhancement could still be useful for restoring lizard communities in mammal-free sanctuaries.</p>

“Farming with Alternative Pollinators” approach increases pollinator abundance and diversity in faba bean fields

Pollinators are threatened worldwide and strategies and measures to support their conservation are proliferating. Among them, the approach “Farming with Alternative Pollinators” (FAP) aims to support pollinators by seeding strips of pollinator-attracting cultivated plants surrounding the crops, and simultaneously providing income to the farmer. In this study we assessed whether this approach supports pollinator diversity in agro-ecosystems and increases flower visitor diversity and abundance in faba bean fields in north-west Morocco. We tested the impact of FAP using a variety of marketable habitat enhancement plants (MHEP): flax, coriander, arugula, chia and canola. A total of 62 pollinator species were recorded, among which almost half of them are new records for the region. Most wild pollinators recorded in faba bean were digger bees (genus Anthophora) and long-horn bees (genus Eucera). MHEP shared diverse flower visitors with faba bean and hosted diverse pollinator groups that did not meet their food requirements from the main crop. The FAP approach highly increased flower visitor abundance and diversity in the whole FAP fields, however it did not generate significant pollinator spillover towards the main crop. Implications for insect conservation: our results show that the FAP approach is an effective approach to mitigate pollinator decline in agro-ecosystems.

Northern Long-Eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis) Day-Roost Loss in the Central Appalachian Mountains following Prescribed Burning

Before the arrival of white-nose syndrome in North America, the northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) was a common cavity-roosting bat species in central Appalachian hardwood forests. Two successive prescribed burns on the Fernow Experimental Forest, West Virginia, in 2008 and 2009, were shown to positively affect maternity colony day-roost availability and condition in the near-term. However, whether immediate benefits were temporary and if burned forests actually experienced an accelerated loss of trees and snags possibly suitable for bats more than background loss in unburned forests became an important question following the species’ threatened designation. In 2016, we revisited 81 of 113 northern long-eared bat maternity colony day-roosts initially discovered in 2007–2009 with the objective of ascertaining if these trees and snags were still standing and thus potentially “available” for bat use. Initial tree or snag stage condition class and original year of discovery were contributory factors determining availability by 2016, whereas exposure to prescribed fire and tree/snag species decay resistance were not. Because forest managers may consider using habitat enhancement to improve northern long-eared bat survival, reproduction, and juvenile recruitment and must also protect documented day-roosts during forestry operations, we conclude that initial positive benefits from prescribed burning did not come at the expense of subsequent day-roost loss greater than background rates in these forests at least for the duration we examined.

Pollinator habitat plantings benefit wild, native bees, but do not necessarily favor rare species

Installing pollinator habitat is a ubiquitous conservation tool, but little is known about which pollinator taxa require support, or which benefit from habitat installations. We studied the response of rare and common bees to pollinator habitat enhancement. We used independent regional datasets to designate bee species as common or rare based on their rank according to one of three metrics: a) site occurrence frequency, b) local relative abundance, and c) geographic range size. We asked whether the abundance or richness of rare and common bees were greater in pollinator habitat, relative to old-field controls. Because we used an arbitrary, quantile-based cutoff to categorize species rarity, we conducted sensitivity analysis and controlled for rarity classification errors with a null model. With this null model, we determined whether rare and/or common species responded to pollinator habitat disproportionately, compared to the expectation for "typical" bee species. We found that the number of individuals and of species designated as rare based on local relative abundance was greater in pollinator habitat enhancements. The number of individuals from bee species designated as rare based on site occurrence was lower in pollinator habitat enhancements, but the number of species was not clearly different between habitat types. We did not find a clear positive nor negative effect of habitat enhancement for species designated rare based on geographic range size. For all three rarity metrics, common species increased in abundance and richness in pollinator habitat relative to controls. Null models indicated that in most cases, neither rare nor common species disproportionately benefited from pollinator habitat. Synthesis and Applications: Our results suggest that pollinator habitat can lead to an increase in the abundance and richness of bees, including species that are rare and that are common. However, rare species appeared to respond differently than typical species, and depending on how species were classified as rare, could display muted or even negative responses to habitat enhancement. Targeting rare species with specific floral resources or unique habitat types may lead to better outcomes for rare and threatened species.

Modelling three-dimensional space to design prey refuges using video game software

© 2021 The Authors. Refuges can be ecologically important, allowing access only to some species or individuals and providing prey protection from predators. Creation of refuges can be used to protect threatened species from introduced predators, which can have large negative impacts that are difficult to attenuate via other means. To design refuges for conservation purposes, refuge accessibility to different species must be understood. Traditional techniques are not adequate to measure or describe complex three-dimensional spaces which are often important refuges. We designed a novel predictive method for modeling three-dimensional refuge space using video game software that simulates real-world physics (Unity, PhysX). We use the study system of endemic New Zealand skinks (Oligosoma spp.), their introduced predators, house mice (Mus musculus), and the habitat of interstitial spaces within rock piles to demonstrate how this modeling technique can be used to inform design of habitat enhancement for conservation. We used video game software to model realistic rock piles and measure their interstitial spaces, and found that the spaces we predicted matched those we measured in real rock piles using computed tomography (CT) scanning. We used information about the sizes of gaps accessible to skinks and mice and the results of our modeling to determine the optimal size of rocks to create refuges which would protect skinks from mice. We determined the ideal rock size to be those with graded diameters of 20–40 mm. The approach we developed could be used to describe interstitial spaces in habitats as they naturally occur, or it could be applied to design habitats to benefit particular species.