No single tool is more fundamental to writing—and more
unexamined—than the computer keyboard. Most of us in the West never consider that the
standard QWERTY key layout, i.e. the staggered key design and the selection of keys
available, is anything but the received, traditional means of text input. And as such,
keyboard/device manufacturers wield a unique form of power: they dictate the kind of words
we can create. They further decide, however unconsciously, the motions our fingers take when
we write; the staggered layout was necessary for the proper functioning of mechanical
typewriters, but has no necessity for computers (let alone mobile devices), yet continues to
be replicated, despite the fact that it is responsible for repetitive stress injuries that
could be eliminated or reduced with an improved ergonomic design. QWERTY may even shape the
meaning of words that we type. Furthermore, considering the global reach of QWERTY against
the backdrop of language diversity, and particularly the approximately 300 non-Latin scripts
in existence, the hegemony of default QWERTY keyboards hints at the ongoing impacts of the
colonial legacy within digital technologies. Thus, to make computing, and the Internet, more
equitable and humane, we must reimagine our keyboard layouts, the characters they include,
and our modes of human-computer interaction. Our paper presents this case, employing data
analyses of hardware and software keyboard usage statistics.