cholinergic phenotype
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

42
(FIVE YEARS 4)

H-INDEX

18
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 16
Author(s):  
Sonia Do Carmo ◽  
Benjamin Kannel ◽  
A. Claudio Cuello

The cause of the loss of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons (BFCNs) and their terminal synapses in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has provoked a decades-long controversy. The cholinergic phenotype of this neuronal system, involved in numerous cognitive mechanisms, is tightly dependent on the target-derived nerve growth factor (NGF). Consequently, the loss of BFCNs cholinergic phenotype in AD was initially suspected to be due to an NGF trophic failure. However, in AD there is a normal NGF synthesis and abundance of the NGF precursor (proNGF), therefore the NGF trophic failure hypothesis for the atrophy of BCNs was abandoned. In this review, we discuss the history of NGF-dependency of BFCNs and the atrophy of these neurons in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Further to it, we propose that trophic factor failure explains the BFCNs atrophy in AD. We discuss evidence of the occurrence of a brain NGF metabolic pathway, the dysregulation of which, in AD explains the severe deficiency of NGF trophic support for the maintenance of BFCNs cholinergic phenotype. Finally, we revise recent evidence that the NGF metabolic dysregulation in AD pathology starts at preclinical stages. We also propose that the alteration of NGF metabolism-related markers in body fluids might assist in the AD preclinical diagnosis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luigi Manni ◽  
Giorgio Conti ◽  
Antonio Chiaretti ◽  
Marzia Soligo

Since the 1980s, the development of a pharmacology based on nerve growth factor (NGF) has been postulated for the therapy of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). This hypothesis was based on the rescuing effect of the neurotrophin on the cholinergic phenotype of the basal forebrain neurons, primarily compromised during the development of AD. Subsequently, the use of NGF was put forward to treat a broader spectrum of neurological conditions affecting the central nervous system, such as Parkinson’s disease, degenerative retinopathies, severe brain traumas and neurodevelopmental dysfunctions. While supported by solid rational assumptions, the progress of a pharmacology founded on these hypotheses has been hampered by the difficulty of conveying NGF towards the brain parenchyma without resorting to invasive and risky delivery methods. At the end of the last century, it was shown that NGF administered intranasally to the olfactory epithelium was able to spread into the brain parenchyma. Notably, after such delivery, pharmacologically relevant concentration of exogenous NGF was found in brain areas located at considerable distances from the injection site along the rostral-caudal axis. These observations paved the way for preclinical characterization and clinical trials on the efficacy of intranasal NGF for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases and of the consequences of brain trauma. In this review, a summary of the preclinical and clinical studies published to date will be attempted, as well as a discussion about the mechanisms underlying the efficacy and the possible development of the pharmacology based on intranasal conveyance of NGF to the brain.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fulton T. Crews ◽  
Rachael Fisher ◽  
Chloe Deason ◽  
Ryan P. Vetreno

Binge drinking and alcohol abuse are common during adolescence and cause both cognitive deficits and lasting cholinergic pathology in the adult basal forebrain. Acetylcholine is anti-inflammatory and studies using the preclinical adolescent intermittent ethanol (AIE; 5.0 g/kg, i.g., 2 day on/2 day off from postnatal day [P]25 to P54) model of human adolescent binge drinking report decreased basal forebrain cholinergic neurons (BFCNs) and induction of proinflammatory genes that persist long into adulthood. Recent studies link AIE-induced neuroimmune activation to cholinergic pathology, but the underlying mechanisms contributing to the persistent loss of BFCNs are unknown. We report that treatment with the cholinesterase inhibitor galantamine (4.0 mg/kg, i.p.) administered during AIE (i.e., P25–P54) or following the conclusion of AIE (i.e., P57–P72) recovered the persistent loss of cholinergic neuron phenotype markers (i.e., ChAT, TrkA, and p75NTR) and somal shrinkage of residual ChAT + neurons known to persist in AIE-exposed adults. Galantamine treatment also recovered the AIE-increased expression of the proinflammatory receptors TLR4 and RAGE, the endogenous TLR4/RAGE agonist HMGB1, and the transcription activation marker pNF-κB p65. Interestingly, we find BFCNs express TLR4 and RAGE, and that AIE treatment increased pNF-κB p65 expression in adult ChAT + IR neurons, consistent with intracellular HMGB1-TLR4/RAGE signaling within BFCNs. AIE increased epigenetic transcription silencing markers (i.e., H3K9me2 and H3K9me3) in the adult basal forebrain and H3K9me2 occupancy at cholinergic phenotype gene promoters (i.e., ChAT and TrkA). The finding of no AIE-induced changes in total basal forebrain NeuN + neurons with galantamine reversal of AIE-induced ChAT + neuron loss, TLR4/RAGE-pNF-κB p65 signals, and epigenetic transcription silencing markers suggests that AIE does not cause cell death, but rather the loss of the cholinergic phenotype. Together, these data suggest that AIE induces HMGB1-TLR4/RAGE-pNF-κB p65 signals, causing the loss of cholinergic phenotype (i.e., ChAT, TrkA, and p75NTR) through epigenetic histone transcription silencing that result in the loss of the BFCN phenotype that can be prevented and restored by galantamine.


2019 ◽  
Vol 528 (2) ◽  
pp. 283-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nailyam Nasirova ◽  
Lely A. Quina ◽  
Ibis M. Agosto‐Marlin ◽  
Jan‐Marino Ramirez ◽  
Evelyn K. Lambe ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 177 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-64
Author(s):  
B. Schütz ◽  
S. Bader ◽  
C. Ringer ◽  
C. Gäckler ◽  
G. Krasteva-Christ ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 539 ◽  
pp. 60-64
Author(s):  
Danielle M. Meola ◽  
Zhi Huang ◽  
Michael King ◽  
John M. Petitto

PLoS ONE ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. e21166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ignacio Lopez-Coviella ◽  
Tiffany J. Mellott ◽  
Aletta C. Schnitzler ◽  
Jan K. Blusztajn

2010 ◽  
Vol 519 (1) ◽  
pp. 162-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shamprasad Varija Raghu ◽  
Dierk F. Reiff ◽  
Alexander Borst

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document