Abstract
Background and Aims
There is a high prevalence of malnutrition (PEW) in patients on dialysis (HD-PD). There is no single tool to diagnose it, varying the percentage according to the one used.
Aim
To assess prevalence of malnutrition-inflammation by MIS scale (malnutrition-inflammation-score) in HD or PD patients of Spanish dialysis units.
Method
We evaluated 2937 patients on dialysis (HD+PD) in Spain were evaluated on the MIS scale strata (Kalantar-Zadeh 1999) also analyzing:
Common data
Age, sex, dialysis time, Charlson-I., RRF, albumin,prealbumin,Kt/V transferrin, CRP, DM
, Specific-HD
HD type, AVF or Catheter
, Specific-PD
PD-type, transport type.
Statistical analysis with SPSS.23 software, using parametric and non-parametric test.
Results
We evaluate 2748 HD patients, median age 71 (RIC20), 65.90% male, median MIS 6 (RIC4), DM 36.91%, T in HD 36m (RIC54), FRR 35.44% , Charlson Index 7 (RIC4) and 186 in PD (62.96% men), median
-age 62 (RIC 24), median-MIS 4 (RIC 2), T in PD of 18.5 m (RIC 23.5),DM 30.77%, FRR 79.89%, I Charlson 5 (RIC 4), In PDA 99pac-52.38%.
Prevalence of global malnutrition (MIS>2) was 89% considering HD+DP and 50% when MIS>5 (table 1)
In PD the higher normonutrides greater Kt/V in manual vs automatic not the malnourished ones. FRR significantly in greater % in normonutrides. No differences in malnutrition depending on carrier type. CRP sig major in MIS>2 and >5
In HD, Normo versus malnourished and with MIS>5 significant difference: HD type, CRP, HD Type, AVF vs catheter, age,sex.
The prescription for Oral supplement was low and higher in HD 12.4% vs DP 6.3%.
Conclusions
1.- There is a high prevalence of malnutrition on dialysis being higher in HD. 2.- In PD, FRR major and CRP minor in well-nourished versus malnourished. 3.- In HD: Normo versus malnourished and with MIS>5 significant difference: HD type, CRP,Charlson I. AVF vs catheter, age,sex. 4.- There is a percentage of malnourished patients with very low percentage of oral supplement.