scholarly journals Nature of Dust Grains in the Atmosphere of Comet Ashbrook

1980 ◽  
Vol 90 ◽  
pp. 259-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. V. Dobrovolsky ◽  
N. N. Kiselev ◽  
G. P. Chernova ◽  
F. A. Tupieva ◽  
N. V. Narizhnaja

Anomalous polarization at small phase angles is confirmed as a common feature of dusty cometary atmospheres. The opposition effect is detected and interpreted as evidence of similarity between grains covering interplanetary, cometary and asteroidal surfaces. The prevailing radii of dust grains in the comet's atmosphere are estimated to be 0.15-0.19 μm.

1984 ◽  
Vol 75 ◽  
pp. 147-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Audouin Dollfus

ABSTRACTThe high magnification visual telescopic observation of Saturn’s rings exhibits divisions, gaps and bright sub-rings. B. Lyot gave a first description of these features. Later, with still more resolving telescopes, we improved the analysis of the ring features. Some gaps and concentric bright or dark sub-rings are phase angle dependent; the steep luminance peaks of their light curves around zero phase angle are volume-density dependent (opposition effect); the overall result produces changes in the shapes and intensities of these features at small phase angles, which are analysed.


1971 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. 166-169
Author(s):  
Jaylee M. Mead

Mie scattering calculations have been made for atmospheric aerosols having various indices of refraction to determine their possible contribution to a Martian opposition effect, such as that reported by O'Leary in 1967. Neither substances with a real index between 1.20 and 1.50, such as ice, water, or solid CO2, nor highly absorbing materials, such as limonite, can produce the observed effect. Submicron-sized spherical particles with refractive indices of 1.55 to 2.00 do, on the other hand, exhibit a marked increase in reflectivity at small phase angles and might be responsible for the enhanced brightness at the shorter wavelengths.


1971 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. 141-155
Author(s):  
William M. Irvine ◽  
James C. Higdon ◽  
Susan J. Ehrlich

Observations of Mars previously reported in 10 narrow bands between 3150 Å and 1.06 μ and in UBV are analyzed for brightness variations which correlate with longitude of the central meridian. Such an effect is found for λ ≥ 5000 Å, with some evidence for such a correlation at λ = 4570 Å. The data are then corrected to the mean (over longitude) brightness and a linear phase curve fitted to those observations with phase angle i ≥ 15°. An opposition effect (anomalous brightening at small phase angles) is found for wavelengths λ ≤ 5500 Å, in contrast to a result previously reported. The magnitude at zero phase, phase coefficient, and monochromatic albedo are computed for Mars as a function of wavelength.


2018 ◽  
Vol 616 ◽  
pp. A178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingyeong Lee ◽  
Masateru Ishiguro

Aims. The opposition effect has been detected on solar system bodies such as asteroids and comets. Two mechanisms have been proposed to explain the effect: the shadow-hiding opposition effect (SHOE) and the coherent backscattering opposition effect (CBOE). The Hayabusa asteroid sample return mission provides a unique opportunity to investigate the opposition effect on disk-resolved images of the S-type asteroid (25413) Itokawa at very small phase angles α. Methods. We made use of the data taken at α = 0.°04–2.°54 using the Asteroid Multi-band Imaging Camera (AMICA) on UT 2005 October 13. Comparing sets of two images taken at different phase angles, we derived the opposition slope parameter (SOE) that characterizes a linear increase in the reflectance I∕F per unit phase angle. Results. We found that (i) SOE is less dependent on the incidence and emission angles; (ii) the reflectance increases nonlinearly toward the opposition at small angles with α ≲ 1.°4, showing a good correlation between mean I∕F and SOE; and (iii) SOE becomes nearly constant at α ≳ 1.°4 and shows no clear correlation between I∕F and SOE. Conclusions. From these results, we conjecture that CBOE is dominant at α ≲ 1.°4, while SHOE is dominant at α ≳ 1.°4.


2019 ◽  
Vol 630 ◽  
pp. A11
Author(s):  
N Masoumzadeh ◽  
L Kolokolova ◽  
C Tubiana ◽  
M. R. El-Maarry ◽  
S Mottola ◽  
...  

Aims. The Rosetta-OSIRIS images acquired at small phase angles in three wavelengths during the fly-by of the spacecraft on 9–10 April 2016 provided a unique opportunity to study the opposition effect on the surface of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko (67P). Our goal is to study phase curves of the nucleus at small phase angles for a variety of surface structures to show the differences in their opposition effect and to determine which surface properties cause the differences. Methods. We used OSIRIS NAC images that cover the Ash-Khepry-Imhotep region to extract the phase curve, that is, the reflectance of the surface as a function of phase angle. We selected six regions of interest (ROIs) and derived the phase curves for each ROI. We fit a linear-exponential function to the phase curves. The resulting model parameters were then interpreted by spectrophotometric, geomorphological, and phase-ratio analyses, and by investigating the influence of structural and textural properties of the surface. Results. We find evidence for the opposition effect (deviation of the phase curve from linear behavior) in phase curves for all areas. We found an anticorrelation between the phase ratio and reflectance in a small phase angle range. This provides evidence for the shadow-hiding effect. We conclude that the decrease in the slope of the phase ratio versus reflectance indicates a decrease in the proportion of shadowed regions and reduces the contribution of the shadow-hiding effect. Large uncertainties in the determination of the opposition effect parameters with respect to wavelength do not allow us to conclusively claim coherent backscattering in the opposition effect phenomenon. Based on the two analyses, we conclude that the opposition effect of comet 67P in the Ash-Khepry-Imhotep region is mainly affected by shadow-hiding.


2015 ◽  
Vol 113-114 ◽  
pp. 120-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena V. Petrova ◽  
Oksana S. Shalygina ◽  
Wojciech J. Markiewicz

2007 ◽  
Vol 106 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 455-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Psarev ◽  
A. Ovcharenko ◽  
Yu. Shkuratov ◽  
I. Belskaya ◽  
G. Videen
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document