scholarly journals Verification Analysis of the Relationship Between Soil Pressure and Displacement of Retaining Structure

2022 ◽  
Vol 2152 (1) ◽  
pp. 012014
Author(s):  
Jinyong Chen ◽  
Zhongchao Li ◽  
Rongzhu Liang ◽  
Guosheng Jiang ◽  
Wenbing Wu
Keyword(s):  
Analytical Model ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Great Influence ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Hyperbolic Function ◽  
Soil Pressure ◽  
Function Model ◽  
Retaining Structure ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Sinusoidal Function

Abstract Variation laws of earth pressure accounting for the displacement of are taining wall can be well described by mathmatical fitting in the study of the relationship between earth pressure and retaining wall displacement. The common mathematical function expressions of earth pressure displacement of retaining wall can be divided into sinusoidal function model, exponential like function model, hyperbolic function model, fitting function and semi-numerical and semi-analytical model function, etc. The characteristics and shortcomings of the current expression of earth pressure displacement function are summarized. Then combined with the field test and model test, the applicability and characteristics of various mathematical functions in predicting the displacement of earth pressure with retaining structures are analyzed. The results show that when the displacement is small, the sinusoidal function model and the quasi-exponential function model are close to the measured results. When the displacement of retaining structure is large, the fitting results of hyperbolic model and semi-numerical and semi-analytical model are better. For the prediction of earth pressure displacement relationship in passive area, the buried depth has a great influence. And the error between the theoretical value and the actual value has a great influence on the fitting result of the model.

The Relationship between Retaining Wall Deformation and Earth Pressure in Deep Excavation

2012 ◽  
Vol 446-449 ◽  
pp. 1690-1695
Author(s):  
She Qin Peng ◽  
Qi Hua Zhao ◽  
Zi Yang Chen
Keyword(s):  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Suspension Bridge ◽  
Deep Excavation ◽  
Foundation Pit ◽  
Retaining Structure ◽  
Pressure Calculation ◽  
Wall Deformation ◽  
Pit Depth ◽  
The Relationship

Earth pressure may change with retaining wall deformation in the process of deep excavating. But how? The answer can be very important to the safety of retaining system. Using monitoring data of north anchor foundation pit of Runyang suspension bridge, this paper studied retaining structure and soil interaction. Find the relationship between retaining wall deformation and earth pressure in deep excavation. In this case, earth pressure increased with wall deformation upward the depth of 18m and decreased with wall deformation down below. A regression equation about foundation pit depth and ratio of earth pressure and wall deformation was established. Then give a simplified earth pressure calculation method considering retaining wall deformation.

The Relationship between Retaining Wall Deformation and Earth Pressure in Deep Excavation

2012 ◽  
Vol 446-449 ◽  
pp. 1690-1695
Author(s):  
She Qin Peng ◽  
Qi Hua Zhao ◽  
Zi Yang Chen
Keyword(s):  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Deep Excavation ◽  
Wall Deformation ◽  
The Relationship

Study on Soil Pressure of High Fill Retaining Wall in Construction Stage

2012 ◽  
Vol 204-208 ◽  
pp. 718-721 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Li ◽  
Xiao Song
Keyword(s):  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Monitoring Data ◽  
Experiment Study ◽  
Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Soil Pressure ◽  
Construction Stage ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Pressure Calculation ◽  
Practical Guidance

The traditional formula using for the calculation of Expressway on high embankment of the retaining wall and the earth pressure can not be very good practical. In order to accurately determine the soil pressure calculation of the complex retaining wall in construction stage for guaranteeing the engineering safety, the experiment study on soil pressure is done, and the study on soil pressure monitoring data is also done. Then the valuable conclusions are obtained to facilitate better practical guidance for construction.

Analytical solution for active pressure of narrow backfills considering arching effect

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sahar Ghobadi ◽  
Hadi Shahir
Keyword(s):  
Analytical Solution ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Back Surface ◽  
Active Earth Pressure ◽  
Soil Pressure ◽  
Principal Stresses ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Arching Effect ◽  
Lateral Earth Pressure

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to study the distribution of active earth pressure in retaining walls with narrow cohesion less backfill considering arching effects. Design/methodology/approach To this end, the approach of principal stresses rotation was used to consider the arching effects. Findings According to the presented formulation, the active soil pressure distribution is nonlinear with zero value at the wall base. The proposed formulation implies that by increasing the frictional forces at both sides of the backfill, the arching effect is increased and so, the lateral earth pressure on the retaining wall is decreased. Also, by narrowing the backfill space, the lateral earth pressure is extremely decreased. Originality/value A comprehensive analytical solution for the active earth pressure of narrow backfills is presented, such that the effects of the surcharge and the characteristics of the stable back surface are considered. The magnitude and height of the application of lateral active force are also derived.

scholarly journals Active Earth Pressure of Limited C-φ Soil Based on Improved Soil Arching Effect

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 3243
Author(s):  
Meilin Liu ◽  
Xiangsheng Chen ◽  
Zhenzhong Hu ◽  
Shuya Liu
Keyword(s):  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Pressure Coefficient ◽  
Ground Surface ◽  
Side Wall ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Active Earth Pressure ◽  
Soil Arching ◽  
Retaining Structure ◽  
Arching Effect ◽  
Soil Arching Effect

For c-φ soil formation (cohesive soil) of limited width with ground surface overload behind a deep retaining structure, a modified active earth pressure calculation model is established in this study. And three key issues are addressed through improved soil arching effect. First, the soil-wall interaction mechanism is determined by considering the soil arching effect. The slip surface of a limited soil is proved to be a double-fold line passing through the retaining wall toe and intersecting the side wall of the existing underground structure until it reaches the ground surface along the existing side wall. Second, the limited width boundary is explicated. And third, the variation in the active earth pressure from parameters of limited c-φ soil is determined. The lateral active earth pressure coefficient is nonlinear distributed based on the improved soil arching effect of the symmetric catenary curve. Furthermore, the active earth pressure distribution, the tension crack at the top of the retaining wall and the resultant force and its action point were obtained. By comparing with the existing analytical methods, such as the Rankine method, it demonstrates that the model proposed in this study is much closer to the measured and numerical results. Ignoring the influence of soil cohesion and the limited width will exponentially reduce the overall stability of the retaining structure and increase the risk of accidents.

Earth Pressure Analysis and Retaining Walls

2015 ◽  
pp. 313-410
Keyword(s):  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Retaining Walls ◽  
Wall Friction ◽  
Underground Structures ◽  
Retaining Structure ◽  
Earth Pressures ◽  
Braced Excavations ◽  
Surcharge Load ◽  
Line Loads

Retaining walls are structures used not only to retain earth but also water and other materials such as coal, ore, etc. where conditions do not permit the mass to assume its natural slope. In this chapter, after considering the types of retaining wall, earth pressure theories are developed in estimating the lateral pressure exerted by the soil on a retaining structure for at-rest, active, and passive cases. The effect of sloping backfill, wall friction, surcharge load, point loads, line loads, and strip loads are analyzed. Karl Culmann's graphical method can be used for determining both active and passive earth pressures. The analysis of braced excavations, sheet piles, and anchored sheet pile walls are considered and practical considerations in the design of retaining walls are treated. They include saturated backfill, wall friction, stability both external and internal, bearing capacity, and proportioning the dimensions of the retaining wall. Finally, a brief treatment of earth pressure on underground structures is included.

scholarly journals Design of Free Cantilever, Counter fort and T-flanged Cantilever Type Retaining Wall

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 3875-3877
Keyword(s):  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Bending Moment ◽  
Retaining Walls ◽  
Project Work ◽  
Passive Earth Pressure ◽  
Soil Pressure ◽  
Steel Bars ◽  
Wing Walls

Retaining walls are widely used as permanent structures for retaining soils at different levels.Type of the wall depends on the soil pressure, such as active or passive earth pressure and earth pressure at rest and drainage conditions. Types of walls generally used are gravity walls, RCC walls, counterfort walls and buttress retaining walls. Retaining walls behavior depends on the wall height and retention heights of the soil at its backfill. Retaining walls are used with tying with more than one wall at perpendicular joints to retain liquids, water storage and materials storages such as dyke walls and tanks. Retaining walls excessively used in culverts and as well as in the bridges for construction of abutment wing walls supposed to resist soil pressures laterally applied perpendicular to the axis of the walls.Based on the present scenario used in retaining structures within the civil industries there requirements of height of walls are being increased due to lake of land and cost of sub structures being incurred in the project work, higher height of walls develops huge bending moment at the base because of the cantilever action of the walls, thus resulting in higher sections at the base which deploys into a uneconomical zone so different wall systems are required in different arrangements so as to transfer the loads with limited sections. In the present study retaining walls of height 6m, 9m and 12m are considered for study and the length of the walls considered as 30m and the material properties considered are M20 and Fe415 steel bars and the supports considered to be fixed at the base

Unified Solution of Coulomb’s Active Earth Pressure for Unsaturated Soils without Crack

2012 ◽  
Vol 170-173 ◽  
pp. 755-761 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen Biao Liang ◽  
Jun Hai Zhao ◽  
Yan Li ◽  
Chang Guang Zhang ◽  
Su Wang
Keyword(s):  
Principal Stress ◽  
Unsaturated Soils ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Research Result ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Friction Angle ◽  
Matric Suction ◽  
Intermediate Principal Stress ◽  
Active Earth Pressure ◽  
Soil Pressure

Based on the unified solution of shear strength in terms of double stress state variables for unsaturated soils, whilst considering the effect of the intermediate principal stress rationally, the unified solution of Coulomb’s active earth pressure for unsaturated soils without cracks is developed. Comparability of the solution is analyzed and influencing characteristic of each factor is obtained. The research result indicates that: the intermediate principal stress and matric suction have obvious impacts on Coulomb’s active earth pressure for unsaturated soils; Coulomb’s active earth pressure has been decreasing until zero with the increase of unified strength theory parameter and matric suction; Coulomb’s active earth pressure increases with the increase of grading angle of retaining wall and slop angle of backfill, but decreases with the increase of matric suction, effective internal friction angle and matric suction angle, while external friction angle has no obvious influence. The proposed unified solution of Coulomb’s active earth pressure enjoys a wider application, and unified solution of Rankine’s active earth pressure is just the special case. The results are of great significance to soil pressure determination such as slope and foundation pit, and to retaining structures design.

Study on Lateral Earth Pressure of Anchored Retaining Wall

2013 ◽  
Vol 353-356 ◽  
pp. 312-317
Author(s):  
Ying Yong Li ◽  
Li Zhi Zheng ◽  
Hong Bo Zhang ◽  
Xiu Guang Song ◽  
Zhi Chao Xue
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Simulation ◽  
Pressure Distribution ◽  
Model Test ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Field Tests ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Soil Pressure ◽  
Gravity Retaining Wall ◽  
Lateral Earth Pressure ◽  
The Stability

In order to ensure the security of gravity retaining wall in the high fill subgrade, the design of gravity retaining wall with anchors is proposed,the characteristic of the new wall is that comment anchors are added to the traditional gravity retaining wall,by friction anchors provide lateral pull to the wall so the stability of the new wall is improved. Because of the constraints of anchors, the lateral free deformation is influenced and the soil pressure distribution is very complicated, field tests showed that soil pressure distribution is nonlinear and pressure concentrate in anchoring position. In order to reveal the supporting mechanism of retaining wall and propose the soil pressure formula, the model test of anchor retaining wall is made and numerical simulation is done. The results show that soil pressure appears incresent above the anchor and decreasing below the anchor, the soil pressre also grew larger away from the anchor proximal in the horizontal direction.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document