scholarly journals Split Domination Vertex Critical and Edge Critical Graphs

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-63
Author(s):  
Girish V R ◽  
Usha P
Keyword(s):  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Critical Graphs ◽  
Critical Graph ◽  
Induced Graph ◽  
Vertex Removal ◽  
Edge Addition

A dominating set D of a graph G = (V;E) is a split dominating set ifthe induced graph hV 􀀀 Di is disconnected. The split domination number s(G)is the minimum cardinality of a split domination set. A graph G is called vertexsplit domination critical if s(G􀀀v) s(G) for every vertex v 2 G. A graph G iscalled edge split domination critical if s(G + e) s(G) for every edge e in G. Inthis paper, whether for some standard graphs are split domination vertex critical ornot are investigated and then characterized 2- ns-critical and 3- ns-critical graphswith respect to the diameter of a graph G with vertex removal. Further, it is shownthat there is no existence of s-critical graph for edge addition.

MATCHING PROPERTIES IN DOUBLE DOMINATION EDGE CRITICAL GRAPHS

2010 ◽  
Vol 02 (02) ◽  
pp. 151-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
HAICHAO WANG ◽  
LIYING KANG
Keyword(s):  
Perfect Matching ◽  
Minimum Degree ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Critical Graphs ◽  
Critical Graph ◽  
Odd Order ◽  
Even Order ◽  
Double Domination

A vertex subset S of a graph G = (V, E) is a double dominating set for G if |N[v]∩S| ≥ 2 for each vertex v ∈ V, where N[v] = {u |uv ∈ E}∪{v}. The double domination number of G, denoted by γ×2(G), is the cardinality of a smallest double dominating set of G. A graph G is said to be double domination edge critical if γ×2(G + e) < γ×2(G) for any edge e ∉ E. A double domination edge critical graph G with γ×2(G) = k is called k - γ×2(G)-critical. In this paper, we first show that G has a perfect matching if G is a connected 3 - γ×2(G)-critical graph of even order. Secondly, we show that G is factor-critical if G is a connected 3 - γ×2(G)-critical graph with odd order and minimum degree at least 2. Finally, we show that G is factor-critical if G is a connected K1,4-free 4 - γ×2(G)-critical graph of odd order with minimum degree at least 2.

2-domination dot-stable and dot-critical graphs

2019 ◽  
pp. 2150010
Author(s):  
Karima Attalah ◽  
Mustapha Chellali
Keyword(s):  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
The Other ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Critical Graphs ◽  
Other Hand

A set [Formula: see text] of vertices in a graph [Formula: see text] is a [Formula: see text]-dominating set of [Formula: see text] if every vertex of [Formula: see text] is adjacent to at least two vertices in [Formula: see text] The [Formula: see text]-domination number is the minimum cardinality of a [Formula: see text]-dominating set of [Formula: see text]. A graph is [Formula: see text]-domination dot-stable if the contraction of any arbitrary edge has no effect on the [Formula: see text]-domination number. On the other hand, a graph is [Formula: see text]-domination dot-critical if the contraction of any arbitrary edge decreases the [Formula: see text]-domination number. We present some properties of these graphs and we provide a characterization of all trees that are [Formula: see text]-domination dot-stable or [Formula: see text]-domination dot-critical.

scholarly journals Computing the split domination number of grid graphs

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
V. R. Girish ◽  
P. Usha
Keyword(s):  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
New Method ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Grid Graphs ◽  
Star Graphs ◽  
Dominating Number ◽  
Vertex Set ◽  
Induced Graph

<p>A set <em>D</em> - <em>V</em> is a dominating set of <em>G</em> if every vertex in <em>V - D</em> is adjacent to some vertex in <em>D</em>. The dominating number γ(<em>G</em>) of <em>G</em> is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set <em>D</em>. A dominating set <em>D</em> of a graph <em>G</em> = (<em>V;E</em>) is a split dominating set if the induced graph (<em>V</em> - <em>D</em>) is disconnected. The split domination number γ<em><sub>s</sub></em>(<em>G</em>) is the minimum cardinality of a split domination set. In this paper we have introduced a new method to obtain the split domination number of grid graphs by partitioning the vertex set in terms of star graphs and also we have<br />obtained the exact values of γ<em>s</em>(<em>G<sub>m;n</sub></em>); <em>m</em> ≤ <em>n</em>; <em>m,n</em> ≤ 24:</p>

scholarly journals Hop Domination in Graphs-II

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-199
Author(s):  
C. Natarajan ◽  
S.K. Ayyaswamy
Keyword(s):  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Total Domination ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Unicyclic Graphs ◽  
The Family ◽  
Independent Domination ◽  
Domination In Graphs ◽  
Domination Numbers

Abstract Let G = (V;E) be a graph. A set S ⊂ V (G) is a hop dominating set of G if for every v ∈ V - S, there exists u ∈ S such that d(u; v) = 2. The minimum cardinality of a hop dominating set of G is called a hop domination number of G and is denoted by γh(G). In this paper we characterize the family of trees and unicyclic graphs for which γh(G) = γt(G) and γh(G) = γc(G) where γt(G) and γc(G) are the total domination and connected domination numbers of G respectively. We then present the strong equality of hop domination and hop independent domination numbers for trees. Hop domination numbers of shadow graph and mycielskian graph of graph are also discussed.

scholarly journals Bipartite graphs with close domination and k-domination numbers

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 873-885
Author(s):  
Gülnaz Boruzanlı Ekinci ◽  
Csilla Bujtás
Keyword(s):  
Positive Integer ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Bipartite Graphs ◽  
Sufficient Condition ◽  
Necessary And Sufficient Condition ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Vertex Set ◽  
Necessary And Sufficient ◽  
The Given

Abstract Let k be a positive integer and let G be a graph with vertex set V(G) . A subset D\subseteq V(G) is a k -dominating set if every vertex outside D is adjacent to at least k vertices in D . The k -domination number {\gamma }_{k}(G) is the minimum cardinality of a k -dominating set in G . For any graph G , we know that {\gamma }_{k}(G)\ge \gamma (G)+k-2 where \text{&#x0394;}(G)\ge k\ge 2 and this bound is sharp for every k\ge 2 . In this paper, we characterize bipartite graphs satisfying the equality for k\ge 3 and present a necessary and sufficient condition for a bipartite graph to satisfy the equality hereditarily when k=3 . We also prove that the problem of deciding whether a graph satisfies the given equality is NP-hard in general.

A note on improved upper bounds on the transversal number of hypergraphs

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (01) ◽  
pp. 1950004
Author(s):  
Michael A. Henning ◽  
Nader Jafari Rad
Keyword(s):  
Upper Bound ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Minimum Size ◽  
Total Domination ◽  
Total Domination Number ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Total Dominating Set ◽  
Isolated Vertex ◽  
Transversal Number

A subset [Formula: see text] of vertices in a hypergraph [Formula: see text] is a transversal if [Formula: see text] has a nonempty intersection with every edge of [Formula: see text]. The transversal number of [Formula: see text] is the minimum size of a transversal in [Formula: see text]. A subset [Formula: see text] of vertices in a graph [Formula: see text] with no isolated vertex, is a total dominating set if every vertex of [Formula: see text] is adjacent to a vertex of [Formula: see text]. The minimum cardinality of a total dominating set in [Formula: see text] is the total domination number of [Formula: see text]. In this paper, we obtain a new (improved) probabilistic upper bound for the transversal number of a hypergraph, and a new (improved) probabilistic upper bound for the total domination number of a graph.

scholarly journals The Split Distance 2 Domination in Graphs

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4.10) ◽  
pp. 589
Author(s):  
A. Lakshmi ◽  
K. Ameenal Bibi ◽  
R. Jothilakshmi
Keyword(s):  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Domination In Graphs

A distance - 2 dominating set D V of a graph G is a split distance - 2 dominating set if the induced sub graph <V-D> is disconnected. The split distance - 2 domination number is the minimum cardinality of a split distance - 2 dominating set. In this paper, we defined the notion of split distance - 2 domination in graph. We got many bounds on distance - 2 split domination number. Exact values of this new parameter are obtained for some standard graphs. Nordhaus - Gaddum type results are also obtained for this new parameter.  

scholarly journals New Bounds on the Double Total Domination Number of Graphs

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Cabrera-Martínez ◽  
F. A. Hernández-Mira
Keyword(s):  
Minimum Degree ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Total Domination ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Total Domination Number ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Total Dominating Set

AbstractLet G be a graph of minimum degree at least two. A set $$D\subseteq V(G)$$ D ⊆ V ( G ) is said to be a double total dominating set of G if $$|N(v)\cap D|\ge 2$$ | N ( v ) ∩ D | ≥ 2 for every vertex $$v\in V(G)$$ v ∈ V ( G ) . The minimum cardinality among all double total dominating sets of G is the double total domination number of G. In this article, we continue with the study of this parameter. In particular, we provide new bounds on the double total domination number in terms of other domination parameters. Some of our results are tight bounds that improve some well-known results.

scholarly journals Distance Domination and Distance Irredundance in Graphs

10.37236/953 ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana Hansberg ◽  
Dirk Meierling ◽  
Lutz Volkmann
Keyword(s):  
Lower Bounds ◽  
Connected Graph ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Distance Domination

A set $D\subseteq V$ of vertices is said to be a (connected) distance $k$-dominating set of $G$ if the distance between each vertex $u\in V-D$ and $D$ is at most $k$ (and $D$ induces a connected graph in $G$). The minimum cardinality of a (connected) distance $k$-dominating set in $G$ is the (connected) distance $k$-domination number of $G$, denoted by $\gamma_k(G)$ ($\gamma_k^c(G)$, respectively). The set $D$ is defined to be a total $k$-dominating set of $G$ if every vertex in $V$ is within distance $k$ from some vertex of $D$ other than itself. The minimum cardinality among all total $k$-dominating sets of $G$ is called the total $k$-domination number of $G$ and is denoted by $\gamma_k^t(G)$. For $x\in X\subseteq V$, if $N^k[x]-N^k[X-x]\neq\emptyset$, the vertex $x$ is said to be $k$-irredundant in $X$. A set $X$ containing only $k$-irredundant vertices is called $k$-irredundant. The $k$-irredundance number of $G$, denoted by $ir_k(G)$, is the minimum cardinality taken over all maximal $k$-irredundant sets of vertices of $G$. In this paper we establish lower bounds for the distance $k$-irredundance number of graphs and trees. More precisely, we prove that ${5k+1\over 2}ir_k(G)\geq \gamma_k^c(G)+2k$ for each connected graph $G$ and $(2k+1)ir_k(T)\geq\gamma_k^c(T)+2k\geq |V|+2k-kn_1(T)$ for each tree $T=(V,E)$ with $n_1(T)$ leaves. A class of examples shows that the latter bound is sharp. The second inequality generalizes a result of Meierling and Volkmann and Cyman, Lemańska and Raczek regarding $\gamma_k$ and the first generalizes a result of Favaron and Kratsch regarding $ir_1$. Furthermore, we shall show that $\gamma_k^c(G)\leq{3k+1\over2}\gamma_k^t(G)-2k$ for each connected graph $G$, thereby generalizing a result of Favaron and Kratsch regarding $k=1$.

Domination Theory in Graphs

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-23
Author(s):  
E. Sampathkumar ◽  
L. Pushpalatha
Keyword(s):  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Correct Conclusion ◽  
Minimum Number ◽  
Domination In Graphs

The study of domination in graphs originated around 1850 with the problems of placing minimum number of queens or other chess pieces on an n x n chess board so as to cover/dominate every square. The rules of chess specify that in one move a queen can advance any number of squares horizontally, vertically, or diagonally as long as there are no other chess pieces in its way. In 1850 enthusiasts who studied the problem came to the correct conclusion that all the squares in an 8 x 8 chessboard can be dominated by five queens and five is the minimum such number. With very few exceptions (Rooks, Bishops), these problems still remain unsolved today. Let G = (V,E) be a graph. A set S ⊂ V is a dominating set of G if every vertex in V–S is adjacent to some vertex in D. The domination number γ(G) of G is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document