scholarly journals MEMANTAPKAN LANDASAN HUKUM FORMIL SEBAGAI ALAT SINGKRONISASI DAN HARMONISASI PERATURAN PERUNDANG - UNDANGAN

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 158
Author(s):  
Insan Tajali Nur
Keyword(s):  
Regional Government ◽  
Second Amendment ◽  
Rules Of Procedure ◽  
Legal Uncertainty ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Laws And Regulations

The regulation in the Regional Regulation is faced with the problem of how the Regional Regulation can regulate the affairs of authority in accordance with the characteristics of the region. But it does not conflict with the higher laws and regulations. One of the problems is Disharmony legislation resulting in differences in interpretation in its implementation; the emergence of legal uncertainty; Legislation is not carried out effectively and efficiently, and legal dysfunction, in a disharmonic manner, the rules and regulations - Invitation under the above laws and regulations is an evaluation material. But de facto, there are a number of draft regulations based on rules outside the order of the laws.Whereas in Article 7 paragraph 2 of Act Number 12 of 2011 confirms the strength of the laws of the legislation in accordance with the hierarchy in paragraph 1. Continued related to Article 140 paragraph (3) of Law Number 23 of 2014 concerning the Establishment of Legislation as has undergone the second amendment to the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 9 of 2015 concerning Regional Government, states that the procedure for preparing a draft Regional Regulation from the Governor or Regent / Mayor is regulated by a Presidential Regulation. Then Article 141 paragraph (2) of the Law on Regional Government states that further Provisions concerning the procedure for preparing the Regional Regulation are regulated in the DPRD Rules of Procedure.Based on the principle of the formation of laws and regulations, the Minister of Home Affairs's regulation violates the principle of conformity between types and materials of content, because the substance should be the material of the contents of the Presidential Regulation as part of the hierarchy of the Order of Regulations - Invitation and the contents of the DPRD Rules of Procedure.

MEMANTAPKAN LANDASAN HUKUM FORMIL SEBAGAI ALAT SINGKRONISASI DAN HARMONISASI PERATURAN PERUNDANG - UNDANGAN

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 158
Author(s):  
Insan Tajali Nur
Keyword(s):  
Regional Government ◽  
Second Amendment ◽  
Rules Of Procedure ◽  
Legal Uncertainty ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Laws And Regulations

The regulation in the Regional Regulation is faced with the problem of how the Regional Regulation can regulate the affairs of authority in accordance with the characteristics of the region. But it does not conflict with the higher laws and regulations. One of the problems is Disharmony legislation resulting in differences in interpretation in its implementation; the emergence of legal uncertainty; Legislation is not carried out effectively and efficiently, and legal dysfunction, in a disharmonic manner, the rules and regulations - Invitation under the above laws and regulations is an evaluation material. But de facto, there are a number of draft regulations based on rules outside the order of the laws.Whereas in Article 7 paragraph 2 of Act Number 12 of 2011 confirms the strength of the laws of the legislation in accordance with the hierarchy in paragraph 1. Continued related to Article 140 paragraph (3) of Law Number 23 of 2014 concerning the Establishment of Legislation as has undergone the second amendment to the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 9 of 2015 concerning Regional Government, states that the procedure for preparing a draft Regional Regulation from the Governor or Regent / Mayor is regulated by a Presidential Regulation. Then Article 141 paragraph (2) of the Law on Regional Government states that further Provisions concerning the procedure for preparing the Regional Regulation are regulated in the DPRD Rules of Procedure.Based on the principle of the formation of laws and regulations, the Minister of Home Affairs's regulation violates the principle of conformity between types and materials of content, because the substance should be the material of the contents of the Presidential Regulation as part of the hierarchy of the Order of Regulations - Invitation and the contents of the DPRD Rules of Procedure.  

MEMANTAPKAN LANDASAN HUKUM FORMIL SEBAGAI ALAT SINGKRONISASI DAN HARMONISASI PERATURAN PERUNDANG - UNDANGAN

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 175
Author(s):  
Insan Tajali Nur
Keyword(s):  
Regional Government ◽  
Second Amendment ◽  
Rules Of Procedure ◽  
Legal Uncertainty ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Laws And Regulations

The regulation in the Regional Regulation is faced with the problem of how the Regional Regulation can regulate the affairs of authority in accordance with the characteristics of the region. But it does not conflict with the higher laws and regulations. One of the problems is Disharmony legislation resulting in differences in interpretation in its implementation; the emergence of legal uncertainty; Legislation is not carried out effectively and efficiently, and legal dysfunction, in a disharmonic manner, the rules and regulations - Invitation under the above laws and regulations is an evaluation material. But de facto, there are a number of draft regulations based on rules outside the order of the laws.Whereas in Article 7 paragraph 2 of Act Number 12 of 2011 confirms the strength of the laws of the legislation in accordance with the hierarchy in paragraph 1. Continued related to Article 140 paragraph (3) of Law Number 23 of 2014 concerning the Establishment of Legislation as has undergone the second amendment to the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 9 of 2015 concerning Regional Government, states that the procedure for preparing a draft Regional Regulation from the Governor or Regent / Mayor is regulated by a Presidential Regulation. Then Article 141 paragraph (2) of the Law on Regional Government states that further Provisions concerning the procedure for preparing the Regional Regulation are regulated in the DPRD Rules of Procedure.Based on the principle of the formation of laws and regulations, the Minister of Home Affairs's regulation violates the principle of conformity between types and materials of content, because the substance should be the material of the contents of the Presidential Regulation as part of the hierarchy of the Order of Regulations - Invitation and the contents of the DPRD Rules of Procedure.  

scholarly journals Ambiguitas Hasil Pemantauan dan Evaluasi Dewan Perwakilan Daerah terhadap Rancangan Peraturan Daerah dan Peraturan Daerah

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-110
Author(s):  
Hanif Hardianto ◽  
Ratna Herwati
Keyword(s):  
Monitoring And Evaluation ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
Second Amendment ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Laws And Regulations

Dewan Perwakilan Daerah merupakan lembaga yang dalam pembentukaannya untuk mewakili kepentingan daerah. Tugas dan kewenangan Dewan Perwakilan Daerah diatur dalam Pasal 22 D ayat (1), (2), (3) Undang-Undang Dasar Negara RI Tahun 1945. Tugas dan kewenangan tersebut dijabarkan dalam berbagai peraturan perundang-undangan, salah satunya Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2018 tentang perubahan kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2014 tentang MPR, DPR, DPD dan DPRD. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis hasil pemantauan dan evaluasi DPD terhadap rancangan peraturan daerah dan peraturan daerah, sebagaimana tercantum dalam Pasal 249 ayat (1) huruf j Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2018. Penelitian dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode yuridis normatif karena bahan hukum perimer yang digunakan adalah peraturan perundang-undangan serta bahan hukum sekundernya adalah literatur dari jurnal dan buku yang berkaitan dengan permasalahan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kewenangan tersebut masih terdapat dualisme karena eksekutif juga memiliki kewenangan untuk memantau dan mengevaluasi rancangan peraturan daerah atau biasa disebut eksekutif preview. Kewenangan yang dimiliki DPD Pasal 249 ayat (1) huruf j Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2018 belum memiliki kejelasan mekanisme yang dilaksanakan sehingga menimbulkan ambiguitas dalam pelaksanannya. Untuk memperkuat kejelasan secara yuridis diperlukan perubahan terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2018 dan Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah. Regional Representative Council is an institution in its formation to represent regional intersests. The duties and authorities of the Regional Representative Council are regulated in Article 22 D paragraph (1), (2), (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic Indonesia.these duties and authorities are spelled out in various laws and regulations, one of which is law number 2 of 2018 concerning second amendment to law number 17 if 2014 concerning MPR, DPR, DPD and DPRD. This study aims to analyze the results of DPD monitoring and evaluation of the draft regional regulations and regional regulations, as stated in Articele 249 paragraph (1) letter J of Law Number 2 of 2018. The study was conducted using normative juridicial method because the primer legal material used was legislation and the secondary legal material was literature from journals and books relating on the problem. The results of the study showed that the authority still contained dualism because the executive also had the authority to monitor and evaluate the draft regional regulation or commonly called an executive preview. The authority possessed by DPD Article 249 paragraph (1) letter J of Law Number 2 of 2018 does not yet have a clear mechanism implemented so as to cause ambiguity in its implementation. To strengthen juridicial clarity, it is necessary to amend Law Number 2 of 2018 and Law Number 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government.

scholarly journals POLICY EVALUATION OF REGIONAL EXPANSION AND DETERMINATION REGIONAL BOUNDARIES IN BANTEN AND WEST JAVA PROVINCE

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 400
Author(s):  
Romi Saputra
Keyword(s):  
Local Governments ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
West Java ◽  
Regional Autonomy ◽  
Second Amendment ◽  
Accelerate Development ◽  
Administrative Area ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic

The regional expansion is a way to accelerate development acceleration. In addition, regional expansion is the process of dividing an existing administrative area into two or more new autonomous regions. Regional expansion in Indonesia is carried out based on the Law of the Republic of Indonesia number 9 of 2015 concerning Regional Autonomy and Regional Government as a result of the second amendment to the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 23 of 2014. However, in the process of regional expansion in Indonesia, there are still some problems. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate government policies in regional expansion and determine regional boundaries in the provinces of Banten and West Java based on the laws in force in Indonesia. The method used in this research is the mix method, namely quantitative and qualitative. The data used are obtained from references and interviews related to regional autonomy policies, regional governments, and the determination of regional boundaries. The results of the evaluation, there are several factors that cause regional expansion, namely religious differences, ethnic and cultural differences, inequality in economic development in an area, and the size of the area. The formation of regional boundaries is carried out through 4 stages, namely Allocation, Delimitation, Demarcation, and Administration. One very important aspect of the implementation of regional autonomy is to merge regions with the hope of strengthening the relationship between local governments and local communities. In addition, it is hoped that there will be more intensive interaction between the community and the new local government, civil society will get better rights and obligations as citizens.

scholarly journals IMPROVING THE AUTHORITY OF THE REGIONAL REPRESENTATIVE COUNCILS IN THE STATE GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA ACCORDING TO THE 1945 CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Dadang Gandhi
Keyword(s):  
Natural Resources ◽  
Central Government ◽  
State Institution ◽  
Economic Resources ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
High State ◽  
Regional Autonomy ◽  
Second Amendment ◽  
State Administration ◽  
The Republic

The existence of the Regional Representative Council (DPD) which is regulated in Article 22D of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (UUDNRI of 1945) with the authority of the DPD as regulated in Law Number 2 of 2018 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 17 of 2014 Regarding the People's Consultative Assembly, the People's Representative Council, the Regional Representative Council and the Regional People's Representative Council (MD3), in particular Article 249 Paragraph (1) letter e. Article 22D of the 1945 Constitution places the position of the DPD as an institution that has the authority to submit a Bill relating to regional autonomy, central and regional relations, the formation and expansion of regions and the merger of regions, management of natural resources and other economic resources as well as related also by placing the DPD position to monitor and evaluate the Draft District / City Regional Regulations and Regency / City Regional Regulations according to Law Number 2 of 2018 concerning the People's Consultative Assembly, the People's Representative Council, the Regional Representative Council, and the Regional People's Representative Council (DPR) ( MD3). This authority will cause problems especially those regulated in Law Number 2 of 2018 concerning MD3, because the Regency / City Regional People's Representative Council and the Governor as representatives of the central government do the same thing as is done by the DPD as regulated in Law Number 23 2014 concerning Regional Government, particularly in the provisions of Article 149 Paragraph (1) and Article 153 Paragraph (1). While the form of coordination that will be carried out by the DPD and the Regional Government has yet to exist, in addition to the DPD's position as a high state institution will cause problems when coordinating with the Regency / City DPRD as an element of the regional government.Keywords: The telescope, Position, DPD, State Administration, Republic of Indonesia

scholarly journals POLITIK HUKUM KEWENANGAN KONSTITUSIONAL DEWAN PERWAKILAN DAERAH DALAM PROSES LEGISLASI PASCA PUTUSAN MK NOMOR 92/PUU-X/2012

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 365
Author(s):  
Anna Triningsih
Keyword(s):  
House Of Representatives ◽  
State Institution ◽  
The State ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Historical Approach ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Laws And Regulations

<p>Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2014 tentang Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan Daerah, Dan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah (UU MD3) pasca putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) dinilai memiliki problem substantif/materil akibat materi muatannya bertentangan dengan Undang-Undang Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 (UUD NRI 1945), yang mengakibatkan kerugian konstitusional terhadap Dewan Perwakilan Daerah (DPD), meliputi dikuranginya kewenangan DPD untuk dapat mengajukan (Rancangan Undang-Undang) RUU, dikuranginya kewenangan DPD untuk membahas RUU dan dikuranginya kewenangan DPD dalam kedudukannya sebagai lembaga perwakilan daerah. Hal ini menunjukan bahwa pembentukan UU MD3 nyata-nyata tidak menghormati putusan MK yang diberi mandat UUD NRI 1945 sebagai lembaga penafsir dan penjaga konstitusi, dengan tidak menghormati, mematuhi, dan melaksanakan putusan MK ini menunjukkan ketidakpatuhan terhadap putusan lembaga negara yang telah ditunjuk konstitusi untuk mengawal kemurnian pelaksanaan konstitusi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode normatif menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan ( statute approach ), pendekatan konsep ( conceptual approach ), dan pendekatan historis ( historical approach ). Ketidaktaatan penyusunan UU MD3 pada putusan MK merupakan pengingkaran UUD NRI 1945 dan perkembangan ini merupakan langkah mundur reformasi. Pembentuk Undang-Undang, dalam hal ini, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR) dan Presiden harus segera melakukan perubahan UU Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan dengan berpijak pada rambu-rambu konstitusional Putusan MK Nomor 92/PUU-X/2012.</p><p>Law Number 17 Year 2014 on the People’s Consultative Assembly, House of Representatives, Regional Representatives Council, and the Regional House of Representatives (MD3 Law) after the decision of the Constitutional Court (MK) is considered to have a substantive problem due to the substance that is contrary to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (the 1945 Constitution), which resulted in the constitutional loss of Regional Representatives Council (DPD), including the reduction of DPD authority to propose draft bills, to discuss draft bills and the reduction in its authority as the regional representative institution. This shows that the drafting of MD3 Law is obviously not respecting the decision of the Court that is mandated by the 1945 Constitution as the interpreter and guardian institution of the constitutional, by not respecting, obeying and implementing MK’s decision which indicates non-compliance with the decision of the state institution that has been designated to guard the purity of the constitution implementation of the constitution. This study uses normative method with statute approach, conceptual approach and a historical approach. The noncompliance of the drafting of MD3 Law towards the MK’s decision is a denial of MK and this development is a step back of Reformation. The legislators, in this case, the House of Representatives (DPR) and the President should immediately amend the Law Number 12 Year 2011 on the Establishment of Laws and Regulations based on the MK’s Decision No. 92/PUU-X/2012. </p>

scholarly journals REFORMASI HUKUM TATA NEGARA MELALUI AMANDEMEN KONSTITUSI (KRITIK TERHADAP PELAKSANAAN OTONOMI DAERAH PASCA REFORMASI)

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-85
Author(s):  
Indra Fatwa
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Analysis Approach ◽  
Regional Autonomy ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Derivative Products ◽  
Laws And Regulations

The purpose of this study was to find out the problems of the practice of regional autonomy in post-Reformation Indonesia. The research method used is a normative legal method with a descriptive analysis approach. The results of the study show that the practice of regional autonomy in post-Reformation Indonesia is still constrained in its implementation. This can be seen from the various laws and regulations derived from the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia which still put forward a centralistic spirit. The conclusion of this research is that it is necessary to reform the law from derivative products of the constitution which regulates the implementation of regional autonomy. This can be started by making amendments to the Constitution. Keywords: Regional Autonomy, Amendments, Constitution.

scholarly journals Comparison of Authority of Village Government Before and After the Implementation of Law Number 6 of 2014 Concerning Village

2019 ◽  
pp. 1609-1613
Author(s):  
Raden Hamidi ◽  
Ahmad Yamin ◽  
Nyoman Nurjaya ◽  
Idrus Abdullah ◽  
Gatot Dwi Hendro W.
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
City Government ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Village Government ◽  
The Village ◽  
Government Authority ◽  
Laws And Regulations

The village, or what is called by another name, existed before Indonesian independence. Regulations regarding villages are regulated in several laws and regulations. The purpose of this research is to analyze and find a comparison of the authority of village administration before and after the implementation of Law no. 6 of 2014. Research methods, types of normative legal research, with philosophical approaches, statutory approaches, conceptual approaches, and historical approaches, using primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The obtained legal materials are processed and analyzed prescriptive normatively. In conclusion, the comparison of village government authority before the implementation of Law No. 6 of 2014 places the village authority in two roles, namely the authority to manage its own household, and the role as the lowest government under the sub-district head, and the uniformity of villages throughout the territory of the Republic of Indonesia, before the implementation of the Law No.6 of 2014, the authority of the village government remains with the district/city government, so that the authority of the village government is always in a truncated and amputated position.

scholarly journals The Characters of Special Region According to The 1945 Constitution of Republic of Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 06 (02) ◽  
pp. 320-339
Author(s):  
Asep Hermanto ◽  
Anggara Suwahju
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The United States ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
Regional Administration ◽  
Provincial Level ◽  
Second Amendment ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Current Arrangement ◽  
Special Region

The Republic of Indonesia, based on the 1945 Constitution, the second Amendment, recognizes the existence of a Special Region and its distinctive governance. Article 18B, Paragraph (1), of the 1945 Constitution reads, “The State shall recognize and respect entities of regional administration that possess a specificity or a distinctiveness that are to be regulated by law”. Previously, the governance of special region was also regulated in the first version of the 1945 Constitution that was stipulated on August 18, 1945. In addition, it is contained in other constitutions that were formerly effective in Indonesia: the 1949 Constitution of the Republic of the United States of Indonesia, and the 1950 UUDS. The clearest arrangements regarding the status of special region were covered by the 1950 UUDS, whereas the 1945 and the 1949 Constitutions do not provide detailed description of special regional government units. This triggers some fundamental questions related to the substance of special region. This study reveals several facts related to the existence and administration of government in special regions. Among other things, the current arrangement does not open up the possibility of forming new special regions and the administration of special region only exists at the provincial level.

scholarly journals Pelaksanaan Klausul Penyelesaian Sengketa Dalam Akad Perbankan Syariah Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Nomor : 93/PUU-X/2012 Pada Bank Syariah Mandiri KCP Indramayu

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 147
Author(s):  
Mahpudin Mahpudin ◽  
Akhmad Khisni
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Choice Of Law ◽  
Legal Uncertainty ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Dispute Resolution Mechanism

ABSTRAKPutusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Nomor : 93/PUU-X/2012 Tanggal 29 Agustus 2013 telah membatalkan Penjelasan Pasal 55 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 21 Tahun 2008 Tentang Perbankan Syariah adalah soal kepastian hukum. Hal ini dikarenakan dalam Penjelasan pasal 55 ayat (2) menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum antara pilihan hukum dalam lingkup peradilan umum dengan pilihan hukum dalam lingkup peradilan agama. Kepastian hukum secara normatif adalah ketika suatu peraturan dibuat dan diundangkan secara pasti karena dapat memberikan pengaturan secara jelas dan logis. Jelas dalam arti tidak menimbulkan keragu-raguan atau multi tafsir, dan logis dalam arti hukum tersebut menjadi suatu sistem norma dengan norma lain sehingga tidak berbenturan atau menimbulkan konflik norma ataupun adanya kekaburan dan kekosongan norma. Asas ini dapat dipergunakan untuk dapat mengatasi persoalan dalam hal konsep mekanisme dan pilihan hukum dalam penyelesaian sengketa perbankan syariah;Pilihan forum penyelesaian sengketa Perbankan Syariah berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Nomor : 93/PUU-X/2012 Tanggal 29 Agustus 2013 yang membatalkan Penjelasan Pasal 55 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 21 Tahun 2008 Tentang Perbankan Syariah harus dinyatakan secara tegas menyatakan dan menyepakati apakah memilih forum Arbitrase Syariah atau menentukan pilihan forum Pengadilan Agama dalam rumusan klausula Penyelesaian Perselisihan atau Sengketa dalam Akad Perbankan Syariahnya. Artinya memilih atau menentukan salah satu forum mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa syariah yaitu forum BASYARNAS atau Pengadilan Agama, bukan menggabungkan keduanya dalam satu rangkaian rumusan klausula penyelesaian sengketa.Kata kunci : klausul penyelesaian sengketa, akad perbankan syariah, putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi ABSTRACTDecision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 93 / PUU-X / 2012 dated August 29, 2013 has annulled the Elucidation of Article 55 paragraph (2) of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 21 Year 2008 concerning Sharia Banking is a matter of legal certainty. This is because in the Elucidation of article 55 paragraph (2) raises legal uncertainty between the choice of law within the scope of general justice with the choice of law within the scope of religious court. Normative legal certainty is when a rule is created and enacted as it can provide clear and logical arrangements. Clearly in the sense that there is no doubt or multi-interpretation, and logical in the sense that the law becomes a system of norms with other norms so as not to clash or cause conflict of norms or the existence of vagueness and void norms. This principle can be used to solve the problem in terms of the concept of mechanism and choice of law in solving the dispute of sharia banking;The choice of dispute resolution forum of Sharia Banking pursuant to Decision of Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 93 / PUU-X / 2012 dated August 29, 2013 which annul the Elucidation of Article 55 paragraph (2) of Law of Republic of Indonesia Number 21 Year 2008 concerning Sharia Banking must be stated expressly declare and agree on whether to vote for a Shari'ah Arbitration Forum or to determine the choice of Religious Court forums in the formulation of a Clause or Dispute Settlement clause in its Sharia Banking Agreement. It means choosing or determining one of the forums of dispute resolution mechanism of sharia namely BASYARNAS or Religious Court, not merging the two in a series of dispute settlement clause formulas.Keywords: clause of dispute settlement, syariah banking contract, Constitutional Court decision

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document