scholarly journals INTEGRATION PROCESSES IN FORENSIC EXAMINATION: ESSENCE AND PROBLEM ISSUES OF COMPREHENSIVE RESEARCHES

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 162-173
Author(s):  
E. B. Simakova-Yefremian

Modern science considers the complexity of researches as one of the regularities of the process of cognition. Forensic examination, which is aimed at the use of knowledge accumulated in various fields of science with the purpose of resolving problems of legal proceedings, in the process of scientific and technological progress, is constantly subjected to the influence integration processes taking place in these areas. Scientific publications indicate that the integration of knowledge in forensic examination is an obligate process of its development, one of the main levers of influence on the formation of the foundations of comprehensive forensic expert studies; and now it is gaining more and more in depth and spread. Studying the forms of complexation in forensic examination, it is necessary to start from the analysis of the subject, tasks, objects, parties and techniques of comprehensive studies, since integration processes are realized in the development of forensic examination on the subject of knowledge integration, tasks of forensic, objects, subjects of knowledge integration and methods.

Author(s):  
R. Kirin

The article is devoted to the definition, based on the analysis of scientific publications and the prescriptions of domestic legislation, the subject composition of forensic relations and relations in the field of intellectual property, which directly or indirectly participate in the regulation, management, development, use and improvement of scientific and methodological support of forensic expert activities in the field of intellectual property. It has been established that at the legislative level the following are identified: – subjects of organizational relations of departmental scientific and methodological support of forensic expert activity; – subjects of coordination and publishing relations of interdepartmental development of forensic examination; – subjects of the relationship of attestation and state registration of methods of conducting forensic examinations. It is proposed to distinguish between the following types of object-subject warehouses: 1) objects that need support (forensic expertise, forensic examination, expert proceedings); 2) objects that meet the needs of the corresponding level of action (scientific and methodological benefits); 3) entities in need of support (forensic institutions, forensic experts) 4) entities that provide for the needs (ministries, advisory bodies, forensic experts). It has been suggested that the subject requiring collateral can be simultaneously the subject performing this collateral. The expediency is argued and the differentiation of subjects of scientific and methodological support of forensic expert activity in the field of intellectual property on the following integration levels is proposed: – national (regulatory, managerial, judicial); – sectoral; – production (state, private); – territorial; – public (permanent, temporary) – self-regulating; – direct (personal, collective, employee, manager) – functional (organizational, managerial, controlling, security, executive, reporting).


2021 ◽  
pp. 115-120
Author(s):  
T.M. Tagiyeva ◽  

Presented is the analysis of scientific and theoretical approaches to the problem of migration in modern science. Migration is a complex concept in modern science, and therefore attracts attention of many social and humanitarian sciences. It is determined that this direction of scientific research was originated already in ancient historical science then became the subject of study of economic science. Today, thanks to increased interest in this area of social life, theoretical and methodological foundations have emerged for an integrated approach to the analysis of any social phenomenon, associated with migration. This is evident from the number of scientific publications in the world, related to the analysis and forecasting of specific processes and situations of migration. In the future, methodology of research in this area will be enriched through the use of capabilities of mathematics and statistics methods, as well as achievements of psychological science.


2016 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 180-188
Author(s):  
M. V. Shepitko

The article deals with the problems of counteracting the provision of an intentionally misleading conclusion by an expert. It analyzes the rights, obligations and liabilities of an expert. The research focuses on the fact that a forensic expert differs from other participants to criminal legal proceedings - he/she has special knowledge. According to his/her legal status an expert is engaged in this activity on a permanent basis using the powers given by the Law of Ukraine «On forensic examination» and procedural laws. The article pays particular attention to the forms of obligations undertaken by an expert in the course of a pretrial investigation and trial - warning of criminal liability, the oath by an expert. With this regard the article specifies common and distinctive traits of the abovementioned oaths showing different purposes that the lawmaker had in mind while drafting them. It is important to point out to the conclusion that the mechanism of counteracting the provision of an intentionally misleading conclusion by an expert is a means of psychological influence. This episode may indicate a possibility of excessive intimidation of this participant of the criminal legal proceedings.


Legal Ukraine ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 20-25
Author(s):  

The article examines the features of the interaction of a forensic expert and an investigator at the scene of an incident involving the use of firearms, and the determination of the expert’s error when performing his functions in the investigation of criminal offenses related to the use of firearms. The specified list of criminal offenses, the subject of which is firearms, and also analyzed the statistics on the number of registered crimes under the selected article and the percentage of these crimes to crimes against public security committed in the same year. The legislative framework governing the activities of a forensic expert has been checked. The definitions of the concept of “forensic examination” are also given, the essence of interaction between the investigator and the forensic expert is characterized and their forms are indicated. The issues of the features of conducting research with firearms by a forensic expert have been studied. It was proposed to improve the skills of forensic experts to eliminate the poor-quality conclusions of the expert and further facilitate the rapid conduct of the pre-trial investigation at a high level. It was noted about the expediency of interaction between the investigator and the forensic expert by the beginning of the appointment of a forensic examination by prior agreement of questions, the answers to which the investigator wants to see in the expert’s conclusion. It is also recommended to transfer the authority to collect materials and objects that will be subject to expert research to the forensic expert who will conduct the research, and not to the investigator or specialist. Key words: forensic expert, investigator, firearms, procedural features.


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 480-492
Author(s):  
D. Puchko

Analysis of forensic science practice indicates that object range and number of performed construction and engineering researches are constantly increasing. Considering relevance of this kind of forensic science as for the investigation of criminal proceedings and for other types of legal proceedings, the basic provisions related to the theoretical base formation of forensic construction and engendering examinations in its classification aspect are considered. Currently, the lists of types of forensic examinations and forensic expert area of specializations are valid in Ukraine. According to these lists qualification of a forensic expert is assigned to experts of forensic science institutions the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine, as well as to specialists who do not work in state specialized institutions. These Lists are annexes to the Regulation: On Qualification Commissions and Certification of Forensic Experts approved by the No. 301/5 order of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine dated 03.03.2015. According to the specified document, as separate types of forensic examinations, forensic construction engineering, forensic land lot evaluation forensic building evaluation, forensic building evaluation and forensic road examination on corresponding types of expert areas of specialization are recorded. The subject of forensic construction engineering examination and land lot evaluation should be considered factual data and circumstances of the case (production) established on the basis of specialized expertise in construction field having evidentiary value for any type of legal proceedings while research on relevant construction objects: real estate, building materials, structures and related technical documentation. Thus, technical content of construction engineering examinations and forensic land lot evaluations involves forensic construction engineering implementation by examining relevant engineering sites analyzing technical documentation within the subject and tasks of the specified categories of examinations by the relevant subject by applying the appropriate system of research methods. These features distinguish them in independent kinds of forensic science.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-49
Author(s):  
E. V. Chesnokova

The issue of developing a uniform language for international communication in the feld of forensic science is considered. The matters of relative maturity of domestic forensic expert terminology and peculiarities of translated terms usage in forensic expertology and forensic practice are discussed. The concept of expertise subject formulated by modern leading scientists is analyzed, the conclusion is made about the subject of forensic examination as a process of establishing facts and circumstances, the purely applied nature of the concept, as well as the similarity to the defnition of expertise in the ISO international standard. Specifc examples are given. The need to translate some foreign standards into Russian and to adjust and implement several of their provisions in domestic legal system and expert practice to standardize forensic and expert activity is emphasized.


Author(s):  
I. V. Yudin

The subject of judicial expertise is one of the basic concepts in expert activity, which has both scientific and practical significance. Currently, there are several different points of view regarding the concept of “subject of judicial expertise”, which indicates the need for a more in-depth study of this issue


2016 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 208-219
Author(s):  
V. T. Chuprun

The article determines the relevance of introducing a new type of a forensic examination - a «war» examination. It argues the necessity of its theoretical and methodological support. The article offers the subject and object of a forensic war examination and determines the array of its objects. It defines the notion of «tactics» and provides a classification of military actions as well as illustrates its interrelation with an operational planning skills and strategizing. By describing the components and the subject of the research in the field of war science, namely «the art of war», the author demonstrates the presence of particular features peculiar to military actions of different levels. This allows conducting a specific and targeted research by every component into the episodes of organized use of weapons and equipment at the tactical, operational and strategic levels. Based on these findings, the article suggests a tentative classification of forensic examinations - «war» and its subtypes with outlying the specific features of problems connected with war crimes. It also provides requirements to the qualifications and training of a forensic expert under this new specialization.


2019 ◽  
pp. 150-157
Author(s):  

The suggested hypothesis of M.Ya. Sehai allows extrapolating the results of applying whole methods within the framework of each class (forensic expert substratology, forensic expert documentation, and forensic psychonomics). This does not diminish the significance of the scientific ground of the provisions of a particular type of forensic examination, but thanks to the challenging hypothesis of M. Ya. Sehai concerning the relationship of interaction and the provisions justified by him in forensic science, this will allow applying “forensic” methods (which, by and large, does not exist, since methods are general scientific) to the subject of research in other types of forensic examinations, where they have not previously been used. The subject of the study of forensic science and forensic expertology enlarges each other, at least from the perspective of using special knowledge in legal proceedings. Conclusion is the following: in forensic expertology has its own role in justice, it is a completely established theory with a hypothesis and accepted facts at present. Forensic expertology has its own subject; it integrates the scientific methods of individual forensic expert theories and has its own methodological function. Key words: forensic expertology, criminalistics, forensic science, forensic expert substratology, forensic expert documentation, forensic psychonomics, hypothesis.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 30-37
Author(s):  
Е. Лукичева ◽  
E. Lukicheva

The article investigates the features of humanization and humanization of mathematical education. These characteristics are considered as a theoretical basis for advanced training of teachers of mathematics in the development of the modern system of school mathematics education. A deep analysis of the term “mathematics” in order to understanding and perception o the role and importance of mathematics teachers for the development of civilization, scientifi c and technological progress, as well as the universal language of any modern science is made. Specifi c examples of integration (as replenishment of knowledge) and interpenetration of the content of mathematics and other educational areas (physics, chemistry, Philology, philosophy, etc.), contributing to the quality of school education are given. The emergence of a new modern metamathematics is noted, which is extremely relevant in the process of achieving metasubject learning outcomes by students. Values, opportunities and necessity of development of the personality of the school student by means of the subject “mathematics” are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document