Vermiculite Filler Modified with Casein, Chitosan, and Potato Protein as a Flame Retardant for Polyurethane Foams

In this study, polyurethane (PU) composite foams were modified with 2 wt.% of vermiculite fillers, which were themselves modified with casein, chitosan, and potato protein. The impact of the fillers on selected properties of the obtained composites, including their rheological (foaming behavior, dynamic viscosity), thermal (temperature of thermal decomposition stages), flame-retardant (e.g., limiting oxygen index, ignition time, heat peak release), and mechanical properties (toughness, compressive strength (parallel and perpendicular), flexural strength) were investigated. Among all the modified polyurethane composites, the greatest improvement was noticed in the PU foams filled with vermiculite modified with casein and chitosan. For example, after the addition of modified vermiculite fillers, the foams’ compressive strength was enhanced by ~6–18%, their flexural strength by ~2–10%, and their toughness by ~1–5%. Most importantly, the polyurethane composites filled with vermiculite filler and modified vermiculite fillers exhibited improved flame resistance characteristics (the value of total smoke release was reduced by ~34%, the value of peak heat release was reduced by ~25%).

Influence of the Protein Content on Fiber Morphology and Heat Treatment of Electrospun Potato Protein–Maltodextrin Fibers

The production of ultrafine fibers of proteins and polysaccharides by needleless electrospinning can be performed prior to a thermal treatment to form glycoconjugates via the first stage of the Maillard reaction. The aim was to produce potato protein–maltodextrin conjugates with a varying protein content of 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, and 0.2 g/mL by needleless electrospinning and subsequent thermal treatment (0, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h at 65 °C and 75% relative humidity). The concentrations of the maltodextrins, with a dextrose equivalent of 2 and 21, were kept constant at 0.8 and 0.1 g/mL. The highest fiber production rate was achieved with a protein content of 0.1 g/mL (5.8 ± 0.4 g/h). With increasing protein content, the production rate decreased to 2.8 ± 0.5 g/h. The fibers obtained from the spinning solution containing 0.2 g/mL protein showed the largest average diameter (4.0 ± 1.5 µm) and the broadest fiber diameter distribution. The protein content of the fibers was close to that of the corresponding spinning solution. The browning index after 48 h of heating increased for all samples (9.7–14.7) compared to the unheated samples (1.1–3.3). The results indicate that the protein content has an impact on the yield, the fiber diameter, and the morphology of the fibers.

Comparison of some functional properties and protein profiles of different protein sources with egg components

Emulsifying and foaming properties of plant and animal-sourced proteins; wheat protein hydrolysates (WP1, WP2, and WP3), potato protein isolates (PP1, PP2), pea proteins isolates (PeP1, PeP2), whey protein concentrate (WPC), and buttermilk powder (BMP) were compared with the egg white powder (EWP) and egg yolk powder (EYP). Foaming capacity, stability, emulsion activity, stability, heat stability, morphology, and electrophoretic protein profiles were determined. The proteins representing competitive emulsifying functions were PeP1, WPC, and BMP. Heat treatment for 30 min at 80°C remarkably reduced the emulsion activity (EA) of EYP. Our findings demonstrated that patatin-rich potato protein (PP1), an allergen-free and vegan option, has great potential to replace the foaming function of the egg white. The relationship between the protein profiles of the samples and their functional properties was further discussed in detail.