tbm performance
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

104
(FIVE YEARS 37)

H-INDEX

18
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2021 ◽  
Vol 118 ◽  
pp. 104183
Author(s):  
Danial Jahed Armaghani ◽  
Saffet Yagiz ◽  
Edy Tonnizam Mohamad ◽  
Jian Zhou

Author(s):  
Sarah Sissins ◽  
Chrysothemis Paraskevopoulou

AbstractA major challenge that TBM performance is requested to deal with for a successful and effective progress is tunnelling through lithologically and geomechanically heterogeneous rock masses. Such heterogeneous environments are common and recent tunnel examples in the UK include the Hinckley Point C offshore cooling tunnels being driven through interbedded carbonaceous mudstone/shales and argillaceous limestone and the Anglo American’s Woodsmith Mine Mineral Transport System tunnel in Redcar Mudstone with beds of ironstone. This inherent geological heterogeneity leads to difficult tunnelling conditions that initially stem from predicting a sound and representative ground model that can be used to preliminary assess the TBM performance. In this work, an exhaustive review of existing TBM Penetration Rate (PR) methods identified that no models address the issue of parameter selection for heterogeneous rock masses comprising layers with different rock strengths. Consequently, new approaches are required for estimating rock mass behaviour and machine performance in such environments. In the presented work the Blue Lias Formation (BLI), which is characterised by its layered rock mass, comprising very strong limestone, interbedded with weak mudstone and shales, is investigated. BLI formation is considered herein being a representative example of lithological heterogeneity. Based on the fieldwork carried out in three localities in the Bristol Channel Basin (S. Wales and Somerset), geological models are produced based on which a geotechnical model is developed, and four ground types are determined. Implications of the current findings for TBM performance are assessed, including faulting, groundwater inflow and excavation stability with a particular focus on both PR and advance rate. A modified approach using the existing empirical models is proposed, developed and presented in this paper that can be used as a guide to determine TBM performance in heterogeneous rock masses reducing the risk of cost and time overruns.


2021 ◽  
Vol 54 (1D) ◽  
pp. 105-113
Author(s):  
Burkan Othman

There are a few studies on the engineering properties of the Pila Spi Formations in scattered areas of Northern Iraq, but there is no study on predicting the performance of Tunnel Boring Machines (TBM), which is of great importance in future large engineering projects in Iraq. The study area is located on the Takya about 50 km south the center of Sulaimania City. Field and laboratory studies were conducted on five (5) selected sites situated in the southwestern flank of the Qara Dagh anticline. The axis of the anticline extends from NW-SE of Iraq with a length of roughly 116 km. The engineering and field results of the samples collected from different locations indicate that the compressive strength of the rocks having a fine texture and slightly weathered characteristics ranges between strong to very strong with high dry density and low moisture content. In addition, the average Schmidt hammer rebound and weight losses percentages of Lose Angeles values are 48 and 22%, respectively the sizes of the blocks range from large to very large, the spacing of the discontinuities is medium to wide. The performance of TBM in terms rate of advance is generally determined based on these geological rock materials and masses. To estimate the rate advance of boring machine (TBM) in this study, the method depends on the total hardness. After applying the total hardness method, it was estimated that the predicted rate of advancement of the TBM would be very slow (approximately 1.57 -1.86 m/hr) due to the strong hardness of the rocks of Pila Spi Formation.


Author(s):  
Seyed Mahdi Pourhashemi ◽  
Kaveh Ahangari ◽  
Jafar Hassanpour ◽  
Seyed Mosleh Eftekhari

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (4) ◽  
pp. 3023-3040
Author(s):  
Seyed Mahdi Pourhashemi ◽  
Kaveh Ahangari ◽  
Jafar Hassanpour ◽  
Seyed Mosleh Eftekhari

Author(s):  
Behrooz Keshtegar ◽  
Mahdi Hasanipanah ◽  
Troung Nguyen-Thoi ◽  
Saffet Yagiz ◽  
Hassan Bakhshandeh Amnieh

Author(s):  
Jie Zeng ◽  
Bishwajit Roy ◽  
Deepak Kumar ◽  
Ahmed Salih Mohammed ◽  
Danial Jahed Armaghani ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document