Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Colorectal Cancer: The Fundamental Indication and Application on Immunotherapy

The clinical success of immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of cancer patients, bringing renewed attention to tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) of various cancer types. Immune checkpoint blockade is effective in patients with mismatched repair defects and high microsatellite instability (dMMR-MSI-H) in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), leading the FDA to accelerate the approval of two programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) blocking antibodies, pembrolizumab and nivolumab, for treatment of dMMR-MSI-H cancers. In contrast, patients with proficient mismatch repair and low levels of microsatellite stability or microsatellite instability (pMMR-MSI-L/MSS) typically have low tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and have shown unsatisfied responses to the immune checkpoint inhibitor. Different TILs environments reflect different responses to immunotherapy, highlighting the complexity of the underlying tumor-immune interaction. Profiling of TILs fundamental Indication would shed light on the mechanisms of cancer-immune evasion, thus providing opportunities for the development of novel therapeutic strategies. In this review, we summarize phenotypic diversities of TILs and their connections with prognosis in CRC and provide insights into the subsets-specific nature of TILs with different MSI status. We also discuss current clinical immunotherapy approaches based on TILs as well as promising directions for future expansion, and highlight existing clinical data supporting its use.

Cooperative phagocytosis underlies macrophage immunotherapy of solid tumours and initiates a broad anti-tumour IgG response

Macrophages are abundant in solid tumours and typically associate with poor prognosis, but macrophage clusters in tumour nests have also been reported as beneficial even though dispersed macrophages would have more contacts with cancer cells. Here, by maximizing both phagocytic activity and macrophage numbers, we discover cooperative phagocytosis by low entropy clusters in rapidly growing engineered immuno-tumouroids. The results fit the calculus of proliferation-versus-engulfment, and rheological measurements and molecular perturbations provide a basis for understanding phagocytic disruption of a tumour's cohesive forces in soft cellular phases. The perturbations underscore the utility of suppressing a macrophage checkpoint in combination with an otherwise ineffective tumour-opsonizing monoclonal antibody, and the approach translates in vivo to tumour elimination that durably protects mice from re-challenge and metastasis. Adoptive transfer of engineered macrophages increases the fraction of mice that eliminate tumours and potentially overcomes checkpoint blockade challenges in solid tumours like insufficient permeation of blocking antibodies and on-target, off-tumour binding. Finally, anti-cancer IgG induced in vivo are tumour-specific but multi-epitope and contribute to a phagocytic feedback that drives macrophage clustering in vitro. Given that solid tumours remain challenging for immunotherapies, durable anti-tumour responses here illustrate unexpected advantages in maximizing net phagocytic activity.

TIM-3 blockade enhances IL-12-dependent antitumor immunity by promoting CD8+ T cell and XCR1+ dendritic cell spatial co-localization

BackgroundT cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain containing−3 (TIM-3) blocking antibodies are currently being evaluated in clinical trials for solid and hematological malignancies. Despite its identification on T cells, TIM-3 is predominantly expressed by myeloid cells, including XCR1+ type I conventional dendritic cells (cDC1s). We have recently shown that TIM-3 blockade promotes expression of CXCR3 chemokine ligands by tumor cDCs, but how this drives a CD8+ T cell-dependent response to therapy is unclear.MethodsT cell infiltration, effector function, and spatial localization in relation to XCR1+ cDC1s were evaluated in a murine orthotopic mammary carcinoma model during response to TIM-3 blockade and paclitaxel chemotherapy. Mixed bone marrow chimeras and diphtheria toxin depletion were used to determine the role of specific genes in cDC1s during therapeutic responses.ResultsTIM-3 blockade increased interferon-γ expression by CD8+ T cells without altering immune infiltration. cDC1 expression of CXCL9, but not CXCL10, was required for response to TIM-3 blockade. CXCL9 was also necessary for the increased proximity observed between CD8+ T cells and XCR1+ cDC1s during therapy. Tumor responses were dependent on cDC1 expression of interleukin-12, but not MHCI.ConclusionsTIM-3 blockade increases exposure of intratumoral CD8+ T cells to cDC1-derived cytokines, with implications for the design of therapeutic strategies using antibodies against TIM-3.

IL-10 Rescues CLL Survival through Repolarization of Inflammatory Nurse-like Cells

Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are also called nurse-like cells (NLC), and confer survival signals through the release of soluble factors and cellular contacts. While in most patient samples the presence of NLC in co-cultures guarantees high viability of leukemic cells in vitro, in some cases this protective effect is absent. These macrophages are characterized by an “M1-like phenotype”. We show here that their reprogramming towards an M2-like phenotype (tumor-supportive) with IL-10 leads to an increase in leukemic cell survival. Inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF, are also able to depolarize M2-type protective NLC (decreasing CLL cell viability), an effect which is countered by IL-10 or blocking antibodies. Interestingly, both IL-10 and TNF are implied in the pathophysiology of CLL and their elevated level is associated with bad prognosis. We propose that the molecular balance between these two cytokines in CLL niches plays an important role in the maintenance of the protective phenotype of NLCs, and therefore in the survival of CLL cells.

Comparison of the Immunogenicity of five COVID-19 vaccines in Sri Lanka

We assessed antibody responses 3 months post-vaccination in those who received mRNA-1273 (n=225), Sputnik V (n=128) or the first dose of Gam-COVID-Vac (n=184) and compared the results with previously reported data of Sinopharm and AZD1222 vaccinees. 99.5% of Moderna >94% of AZD1222 or Sputnik V, 72% to 76% of Gam-COVID-Vac (first dose) and 38.1% to 68.3% of Sinopharm vaccinees had ACE2 blocking antibodies above the positive threshold. The ACE2 blocking antibody levels were highest to lowest was Moderna > Sputnik V/ AZD1222 (had equal levels)> first dose of Gam-COVID-Vac > Sinopharm. All Moderna recipients had antibodies above the positive threshold to the ancestral (WT), B.1.1.7, B.1.351.1 and 80% positivity rate for B.1.617.2. Positivity rates of Sputnik V vaccinees for WT and variants, were higher than AZD1222 vaccinees, while Sinopharm vaccinees had the lowest positivity rates (<16.7%). These findings highlight the need for further studies to understand the effects on clinical outcomes.

A Case of Neonatal Thyrotoxicosis with Cardiac Insufficiency

Neonatal thyrotoxicosis is rare and most of the cases are secondary to maternal Graves’ disease. It is usually transient, but can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality if not recognized promptly and treated adequately. Neonates born to mothers treated with antithyroid drugs or those who receive maternal thyroid blocking antibodies may exhibit normal thyroid function or even hypothyroidism at birth. Since there may not be any obvious symptoms of hyperthyroidism at birth, it may be overlooked. Therefore, such neonates should be evaluated properly and monitored regularly to prevent serious complications of hyperthyroidism. We report a case of a 21-day-old male infant who developed thyrotoxicosis with dyspnea, irritability, tachycardia, and cardiac insufficiency. He was born to a mother who was treated for Graves’ disease with antithyroid drugs during pregnancy. We have also discussed the importance of careful examination and monitoring to prevent the development of clinical hyperthyroidism.

Recognition of Variants of Concern by Antibodies and T Cells Induced by a SARS-CoV-2 Inactivated Vaccine

BackgroundSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the virus responsible of the current pandemic ongoing all around the world. Since its discovery in 2019, several circulating variants have emerged and some of them are associated with increased infections and death rate. Despite the genetic differences among these variants, vaccines approved for human use have shown a good immunogenic and protective response against them. In Chile, over 70% of the vaccinated population is immunized with CoronaVac, an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. The immune response elicited by this vaccine has been described against the first SARS-CoV-2 strain isolated from Wuhan, China and the D614G strain (lineage B). To date, four SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern described have circulated worldwide. Here, we describe the neutralizing capacities of antibodies secreted by volunteers in the Chilean population immunized with CoronaVac against variants of concern Alpha (B.1.1.7), Beta (B.1.351) Gamma (P.1) and Delta (B.617.2).MethodsVolunteers enrolled in a phase 3 clinical trial were vaccinated with two doses of CoronaVac in 0-14 or 0-28 immunization schedules. Sera samples were used to evaluate the capacity of antibodies induced by the vaccine to block the binding between Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) from variants of concern and the human ACE2 receptor by an in-house ELISA. Further, conventional microneutralization assays were used to test neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Moreover, interferon-γ-secreting T cells against Spike from variants of concern were evaluated in PBMCs from vaccinated subjects using ELISPOT.ResultsCoronaVac promotes the secretion of antibodies able to block the RBD of all the SARS-CoV-2 variants studied. Seropositivity rates of neutralizing antibodies in the population evaluated were over 97% for the lineage B strain, over 80% for Alpha and Gamma variants, over 75% for Delta variant and over 60% for the Beta variant. Geometric means titers of blocking antibodies were reduced when tested against SARS-CoV-2 variants as compared to ancestral strain. We also observed that antibodies from vaccinated subjects were able to neutralize the infection of variants D614G, Alpha, Gamma and Delta in a conventional microneutralization assay. Importantly, after SARS-CoV-2 infection, we observed that the blocking capacity of antibodies from vaccinated volunteers increased up to ten times for all the variants tested. We compared the number of interferon-γ-secreting T cells specific for SARS-CoV-2 Spike WT and variants of concern from vaccinated subjects and we did not detect significant differences.ConclusionImmunization with CoronaVac in either immunization schedule promotes the secretion of antibodies able to block SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern and partially neutralizes SARS-CoV-2 infection. In addition, it stimulates cellular responses against all variants of concern.

Development of Indole Alkaloid-Type Dual Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Against CTLA-4 and PD-L1 Based on Diversity-Enhanced Extracts

Cancer immunotherapy involves the use of the immune system for cancer treatment. Recently, immune checkpoint-blocking antibodies have become integral for the treatment of some cancers. However, small molecules exhibit advantages over monoclonal antibody drugs, such as cell penetration, long half-life, and low manufacturing costs, and the possibility of oral administration. Thus, it is imperative to develop small-molecule immune checkpoint inhibitors. Previously, we have screened a library of synthetic indole-alkaloid-type compounds, which are produced by diversity-enhanced extracts of Japanese cornelian cherry, and reported that an unnatural pentacyclic compound inhibits CTLA-4 gene expression. In this study, immune checkpoint inhibitors with increased potency were developed by introducing substituents and conversion of functional groups based on the unnatural pentacyclic compound. The developed compounds suppressed not only CTLA-4 and PD-L1 gene expression but also protein expression on the cell surface. Their efficacy was not as potent as that of the existing small-molecule immune checkpoint inhibitors, but, to the best of our knowledge, the developed compounds are the first reported dual small-molecule inhibitors of CTLA-4 and PD-L1.

The Tigit/CD226/CD155 Immunomodulatory Axis Is Deregulated in CLL and Contributes to B-Cell Anergy

BACKGROUND. T cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains (TIGIT) is an inhibitory receptor expressed on T, NK and NKT cells, sharing structural and mechanistic similarities with PD-1 and CTLA-4. TIGIT competes with CD226, its partner receptor, for the binding to CD155 ligand: signaling triggered upon CD155 binding to CD226 potentiates T cell receptor (TCR) signaling and CD8 + T cell cytotoxicity against tumor cells (positive signaling). On the contrary, concomitant TIGIT expression on the cell surface prevents CD226 activation either by sequestering CD155 or by impeding CD226 homodimerization and phosphorylation (negative signaling). Recently, TIGIT was shown to be expressed on the surface of normal memory B cells, where it could directly act to suppress T cell responses. No data are available on TIGIT or CD226 expression by chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells. AIM AND METHODS. Our aim was to investigate expression of the TIGIT and CD226 receptors and of the CD155 ligand in a cohort of clinically and molecularly annotated CLL patient samples. To this end, we designed a multiparametric panel of antibodies for flow cytometry and examined expression of the TIGIT/CD226/CD155 axis in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from our patient cohort. To investigate the impact of TIGIT/CD226 engagement on B cell responses, purified leukemic B cells were activated either through the B cell receptor (BCR) using an αIgM polyclonal antibody or with CpG oligonucleotide and interleukin 15 (IL-15) to induce proliferation. In selected experiments, we added recombinant human (Rh) TIGIT-Fc or CD155-Fc chimeras and αTIGIT or αCD226 blocking antibodies to interfere with this axis. RESULTS. Surface expression of TIGIT, CD226 and CD155 was evaluated in a cohort of 115 CLL samples and compared to age- and sex-matched healthy subjects. Both TIGIT and CD226 were upregulated on leukemic B cells compared to normal B lymphocytes, while CD155 was expressed at lower levels. A similar trend was observed on CD4 + and CD8 + T lymphocytes. High-risk CLLs (unmutated IgV genes, unfavorable cytogenetics and advanced stage) were predominantly TIGIT low and CD226 high, indicating an unbalance towards "positive signaling". Results were confirmed by confocal microscopy analyses on lymph node (LN) biopsies, which showed i) an overall higher TIGIT expression in CLL compared to reactive LNs and ii) among CLL LNs a stronger TIGIT positivity in mutated vs unmutated cases, confirming flow cytometry data. In line with these findings, Richter's syndrome samples and patient-derived xenografts models showed the lowest TIGIT and the highest CD226 levels. We next examined TIGIT axis expression during the follow up of CLL cases who underwent treatment with BTK inhibitor (BTKi). While CD226 levels remained unmodified upon treatment, a sharp decrease in surface TIGIT was detected soon after BTKi initiation. Since TIGIT acts by decreasing TCR signaling to shut down T cell responses, we hypothesized similar functions in B cells. By crosslinking the BCR with an αIgM antibody in a selected cohort of IGHV UM CLL cells, we found that BTK phosphorylation was induced to a lesser extent in TIGIT high compared to TIGIT low samples, suggesting that TIGIT is a marker of CLL cell anergy. Accordingly, interruption of receptors/ligand interactions with RhTIGIT-Fc chimera or with αTIGIT or αCD226 blocking antibodies, modulated BCR signaling capacity. Specifically, in TIGIT high samples, preventing receptor engagement by CD155 increased αIgM-induced BTK phosphorylation; in contrast, in TIGIT low samples, blocking CD155 interaction affected mostly CD226 signaling, thereby depotentiating BCR activation. Similar results were obtained when stimulating CLL cells with CpG/IL-15. Interestingly, we observed a significant upregulation of surface CD226 in CLL cells cultured for 6 days in the presence of CpG/IL-15. CONCLUSIONS. These results show for the first-time expression of TIGIT by CLL cells. Furthermore, they indicate that TIGIT is a marker of CLL cells anergy, whereas activated CLL cells express high levels of CD226. Inhibition of TIGIT binding to CD155 partially restores B cell signaling and activation. Future studies are needed to gain insights on the mechanisms behind its deregulation and to obtain a complete functional characterization of the axis. Disclosures Coscia: AbbVie: Honoraria, Other; Janssen: Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria. Gaidano: Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Astrazeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Allan: Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Epizyme: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celegene: Research Funding; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Genentech, a member of the Roche Group, Janssen Biotech Inc, TG Therapeutics Inc.: Research Funding; AbbVie Inc, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, BeiGene, Janssen Biotech Inc, Pharmacyclics LLC: Consultancy; AbbVie Inc, Ascentage Pharma, Epizyme, Genentech, a member of the Roche Group, Janssen Biotech Inc, Pharmacyclics LLC: Other: Advisory Committee; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding. Furman: Oncotracker: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Expert testimony; Sunesis: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Beigene: Consultancy; Acerta/AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Loxo Oncology: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Morphosys: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; X4 Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria. Deaglio: Heidelberg Pharma: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding.