multiplier function
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

8
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

3
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elango Sekar ◽  
Sampath Palaniswami ◽  
Sajan P Philip ◽  
Raja Sekar S ◽  
Gavaskar K ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 291-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Sun ◽  
Liang Fang ◽  
Guoping He

On the critical line s ═ ½ + i t ( t real), Riemann’s zeta function can be calculated with high accuracy by the Riemann-Siegel expansion. This is derived here by elementary formal manipulations of the Dirichlet series. It is shown that the expansion is divergent, with the high orders r having the familiar 'factorial' divided by power' dependence, decorated with an unfamiliar slowly varying multiplier function which is calculated explicitly. Terms of the series decrease until r ═ r * ≈ 2π t and then increase. The form of the remainder when the expansion is truncated near r * is determined; it is of order exp(-π t ), indicating that the critical line is a Stokes line for the Riemann-Siegel expansion. These conclusions are supported by computations of the first 50 coefficients in the expansion, and of the remainders as a function of truncation for several values of t .


1960 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 367-373
Author(s):  
Mark Mahowald

In this note we will discuss the question of the measurability of the multiplier function of a relatively invariant measure on a group. That is, for a group G, σ-ring S, and a measure μ defined on the sets of S, we assume: E in S, x in G implies xE is in S and μ(XE) = σ(x)μ(E) and study the measurability of the function σ(x).The problem was discussed by Halmos (1, p. 265), on locally compact groups and there the situation proved to be as nice as it could be, that is, if the measure is a non-trivial, relatively invariant Baire measure then the multiplier function is continuous. We prove two theorems for groups in which no topology is assumed. In the first theorem we assume a shearing condition and answer the question completely. The second theorem places a condition on the measure and weakens the shearing assumption. Its proof is complicated and occupies the major portion of this paper.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document