Composition

This chapter explores the philosophical and formal issues surrounding mereological composition. It carefully examines the difference between three main types of fusion: algebraic joins, Leśniewski sums, and Goodman fusions. It also examines different views about their conditions of existence (the so-called ‘special composition question’), including the controversial doctrines of mereological universalism, nihilism, and restricted theories of composition. Next it considers whether fusions are unique and how this impacts extensionality, including presenting a detailed analysis of the thesis known as ‘composition as identity’. A number of ‘structural’ conceptions of composition (and related algebraic principles) are then examined. Finally, parallel to questions about a null object, atomism, and ‘atomless gunk’, the existence of a universal object and the ideas of ‘worldless junk’, and coatomism are considered.

Decomposition

This chapter carefully attends to how decomposition principles are supposed to work, and how different variants and formulations affect the resulting theory in different ways. It begins with the philosophically familiar notion of Boolean complementation, and then gradually discusses ever weaker variants of this notion in the form of various supplementation principles. The chapter evaluates which of these principles are linked to extensionality and which (if any) are constitutive of the minimal concept of parthood. Other decomposition questions include: Can we continually decompose objects into smaller and smaller parts (gunk)? Must there be smallest parts (atoms)? Is there a mereological correlate to the empty set, namely the ‘null object’? Each of these questions is explored in full formal detail, including a characterization of the maximally consistent extensions of classical mereology.

Null Objects in Korean: Experimental Evidence for the Argument Ellipsis Analysis

Null object (NO) constructions in Korean and Japanese have received different accounts: as (a) argument ellipsis ( Oku 1998 , S. Kim 1999 , Saito 2007 , Sakamoto 2015 ), (b) VP-ellipsis after verb raising ( Otani and Whitman 1991 , Funakoshi 2016 ), or (c) instances of base-generated pro ( Park 1997 , Hoji 1998 , 2003 ). We report results from two experiments supporting the argument ellipsis analysis for Korean. Experiment 1 builds on K.-M. Kim and Han’s (2016) finding of interspeaker variation in whether the pronoun ku can be bound by a quantifier. Results showed that a speaker’s acceptance of quantifier-bound ku positively correlates with acceptance of sloppy readings in NO sentences. We argue that an ellipsis account, in which the NO site contains internal structure hosting the pronoun, accounts for this correlation. Experiment 2, testing the recovery of adverbials in NO sentences, showed that only the object (not the adverb) can be recovered in the NO site, excluding the possibility of VP-ellipsis. Taken together, our findings suggest that NOs result from argument ellipsis in Korean.