oceanic eddy
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

61
(FIVE YEARS 15)

H-INDEX

24
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fangyuan Teng ◽  
Changming Dong ◽  
Jinlin Ji ◽  
Brandon J. Bethel ◽  
Aijun Pan ◽  
...  

AbstractUp to now, the literature has shown that the relative wind stress does negative work on ocean mesoscale eddies. In other words, the relative wind stress inhibits the development of the eddies. However, based on a newly derived simplified theoretical model, the present study finds that under the action of a steady and uniform wind field, eddies can rapidly obtain kinetic energy from the wind field following several hours of adaption and adjustment, in which the wind stress transitions from doing negative to positive work. The finding is supported by the fact that the relative wind stress work on oceanic eddies over the northeastern tropical Pacific ocean is positive with the nearly constant gap wind. This implies that energy input from the wind is sensitive to eddy velocity structure, and hence, wind stress is not always a killer of eddies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 787
Author(s):  
Jiaqi Liu ◽  
Shengchun Piao ◽  
Lijia Gong ◽  
Minghui Zhang ◽  
Yongchao Guo ◽  
...  

A mesoscale eddy is detected and tracked in the western North Pacific region. Within the life cycle of the cyclonic eddies, the intensities of eddies make a difference. Satellite images indicate the oceanic eddy keeps westward-moving until it disappears. Oceanographic and acoustic characteristics of the eddy are studied. The acoustic energy distribution results from the different intensity of both modelled eddy and measured eddy are calculated. With sound propagation through the cyclonic eddy and anticyclonic eddy, the position of convergence zone moves away from and towards the acoustic source compared with the sound propagation through background hydrography. The coupling coefficient of different orders of normal modes changes significantly. The closer to the centre of the eddy, the stronger the coupling coefficient.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciano P. Pezzi ◽  
Ronald B. de Souza ◽  
Marcelo F. Santini ◽  
Arthur J. Miller ◽  
Jonas T. Carvalho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (28) ◽  
pp. eabf4920
Author(s):  
Shikhar Rai ◽  
Matthew Hecht ◽  
Matthew Maltrud ◽  
Hussein Aluie

Wind is the primary driver of the oceanic general circulation, yet the length scales at which this energy transfer occurs are unknown. Using satellite data and a recent method to disentangle multiscale processes, we find that wind deposits kinetic energy into the geostrophic ocean flow only at scales larger than 260 km, on a global average. We show that wind removes energy from scales smaller than 260 km at an average rate of −50 GW, a process known as eddy killing. To our knowledge, this is the first objective determination of the global eddy killing scale. We find that eddy killing is taking place at almost all times but with seasonal variability, peaking in winter, and it removes a substantial fraction (up to 90%) of the wind power input in western boundary currents. This process, often overlooked in analyses and models, is a major dissipation pathway for mesoscales, the ocean’s most energetic scales.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guangjun Xu ◽  
Wenhong Xie ◽  
Changming Dong ◽  
Xiaoqian Gao

Recent years have witnessed the increase in applications of artificial intelligence (AI) into the detection of oceanic features. Oceanic eddies, ubiquitous in the global ocean, are important in the transport of materials and energy. A series of eddy detection schemes based on oceanic dynamics have been developed while the AI-based eddy identification scheme starts to be reported in literature. In the present study, to find out applicable AI-based schemes in eddy detection, three AI-based algorithms are employed in eddy detection, including the pyramid scene parsing network (PSPNet) algorithm, the DeepLabV3+ algorithm and the bilateral segmentation network (BiSeNet) algorithm. To justify the AI-based eddy detection schemes, the results are compared with one dynamic-based eddy detection method. It is found that more eddies are identified using the three AI-based methods. The three methods’ results are compared in terms of the numbers, sizes and lifetimes of detected eddies. In terms of eddy numbers, the PSPNet algorithm identifies the largest number of ocean eddies among the three AI-based methods. In terms of eddy sizes, the BiSeNet can find more large-scale eddies than the two other methods, because the Spatial Path is introduced into the algorithm to avoid destroying the eddy edge information. Regarding eddy lifetimes, the DeepLabV3+ cannot track longer lifetimes of ocean eddies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoyan Chen ◽  
Ge Chen ◽  
Linyao Ge ◽  
Baoxiang Huang ◽  
Chuanchuan Cao

The inadequate spatial resolution of altimeter results in low identification efficiency of oceanic eddies, especially for small-scale eddies. It is well known that eddies can not only induce sea surface signal but more importantly have typical vertical structure characteristics. However, although the vertical structure characteristics are usually used for statistical analysis, they are seldom considered in the process of eddy recognition. This study is devoted to identifying eddies from the perspective of their vertical signal derived from the 18-year Argo data. Due to the irregular and noisy profile pattern, the direct identification of eddy core from Argo profile is deemed to be a challenge. With the popularity of artificial intelligence, a new hybrid method that combines the advantages of convolutional neural network (CNN) with extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) is proposed to extract the representative vertical feature and identify eddy from a profile. First, CNN is employed as a feature extractor to automatically obtain vertical features from the input profile at the bottom of the network. Second, the obtained high-dimensional feature vectors are inputted into the XGBoost model, combined with other profile features for classifying profiles that are outside altimeter-identified eddies (Alt eddy). Finally, extensive experiments are implemented to demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed method. The results show that the classification accuracy of CNN-XGBoost model can reach 98%, and about 36% eddies are recaptured. These eddies, dubbed CNN-XGB eddies, are benchmarked against Alt eddies for the vertical structure and geographical distribution, demonstrating a similar or even stronger vertical signal and a prominent eddy belt in the tropical ocean. Within the proposed theory framework, there are various potentials to obtain a better outlook for eddy identification and in situ float observations.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelina Cassianides ◽  
Camillie Lique ◽  
Anton Korosov

<p>In the global ocean, mesoscale eddies are routinely observed from satellite observation. In the Arctic Ocean, however, their observation is impeded by the presence of sea ice, although there is a growing recognition that eddy may be important for the evolution of the sea ice cover. In this talk, we will present a new method of surface ocean eddy detection based on their signature in sea ice vorticity retrieved from Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) images. A combination of Feature Tracking and Pattern Matching algorithm is used to compute the sea ice drift from pairs of SAR images. We will mostly focus on the case of one eddy in October 2017 in the marginal ice zone of the Canadian Basin, which was sampled by mooring observations, allowing a detailed description of its characteristics. Although the eddy could not be identified by visual inspection of the SAR images, its signature is revealed as a dipole anomaly in sea ice vorticity, which suggests that the eddy is a dipole composed of a cyclone and an anticyclone, with a horizontal scale of 80-100 km and persisted over a week. We will also discuss the relative contributions of the wind and the surface current to the sea ice vorticity. We anticipate that the robustness of our method will allow us to detect more eddies as more SAR observations become available in the future.</p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 126 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Guidi Zhou ◽  
Xuhua Cheng

Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 126
Author(s):  
Fangyuan Liu ◽  
Hao Zhou ◽  
Biyang Wen

Oceanic eddy is a common natural phenomenon that has large influence on human activities, and the measurement and detection of offshore eddies are significant for oceanographic research. The previous classical detecting methods, such as the Okubo–Weiss algorithm (OW), vector geometry algorithm (VG), and winding angles algorithm (WA), not only depend on expert’s experiences to set an accurate threshold, but also need heavy calculations for large detection regions. Differently from the previous works, this paper proposes a deep eddy detection neural network with pixel segmentation skeleton on high frequency radar (HFR) data, namely, the deep eddy detection network (DEDNet). An offshore eddy detection dataset is firstly constructed, which has origins from the sea surface current data measured by two HFR systems on the South China Sea. Then, a spatial globally optimum and strong detail-distinguishing pixel segmentation network is presented to automatically detect and localize offshore eddies in a flow chart. An eddy detection network based on fully convolutional networks (FCN) is also presented for comparison with DEDNet. Experimental results show that DEDNet performs better than the FCN-based eddy detection network and is competitive with the classical statistics-based methods.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document