wingtip vortex
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

88
(FIVE YEARS 23)

H-INDEX

11
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pascal Gehlert ◽  
Kshitij Sabnis ◽  
Holger Babinsky
Keyword(s):  

AIAA Journal ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Yang Xiang ◽  
Ze-Peng Cheng ◽  
Yi-Ming Wu ◽  
Hong Liu ◽  
Fuxin Wang

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Yubiao Jiang ◽  
Wanbo Wang ◽  
Chen Qin ◽  
Patrick N. Okolo ◽  
Kun Tang

The characteristics and control of a wingtip vortex are of great significance when considering drag reduction and flight safety of transportation aircrafts. The associated aerodynamic phenomenon resulting from rolling up of a wingtip vortex includes boundary layer flow, shear layer separation, and vortex breakdown, while the interaction of a wingtip vortex with the airframe causes induced drag, wingtip noise, etc. This paper studies a normal blowing method utilized to control the wingtip vortex. Large eddy simulation (LES) technique applied to a straight NACA0012 wing having a chord length ( c ) of 0.4 m is adopted for this study. The Reynolds number based on the chord length is 1.6 × 10 6 and the angle of attack is 12°. The computational approach utilized the dynamic Smagorinsky-Lilly subgrid model for 3D simulations. Normal blowing from a high aspect ratio jet from the wingtip lower surface was used to control the wingtip vortex. From 0.05c to 0.30c, the blowing slit width was 1 mm, with the slit exit treated as a velocity inlet boundary condition which supplied the blowing jet with a momentum coefficient of 0.28%. Results of axial velocity and span-wise pressure distribution of the clean airfoil presented good agreement with known experimental data. LES results indicate that normal blowing suppresses the primary vortex strength, while the vortex core radius, maximum induced velocity, axial vorticity flux, and pressure peak of the primary vortex are reduced by 25%, 28%, 46%, and 52%, respectively. Flow field structures before and after blowing show that blowing suppresses the shedding, coiling, and convergence of the free vortex layers near the primary vortex. This study also shows that normal blowing generates a jet-induced vortex at the location of the secondary vortex, while backflow, volume expansion, and spiral burst can be observed in the jet-induced vortex. The bursting jet-induced vortex destroys the jet-like flow structure of the primary vortex at the trailing edge.


2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Zepeng CHENG ◽  
Siyi QIU ◽  
Yang XIANG ◽  
Chun SHAO ◽  
Miao ZHANG ◽  
...  

AIAA Journal ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Faith Loughnane ◽  
Michael Mongin ◽  
Sidaard Gunasekaran

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Wood-Bowyer ◽  
Alastair West ◽  
Joel Ho Mun Onn ◽  
Chris Cantwell

2020 ◽  
Vol 143 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Lu ◽  
T. Lee

Abstract The ground proximity is known to induce an outboard movement and suppression of the wingtip vortices, leading to a reduced lift-induced drag. Depending on the ground boundary condition, a large scatter exists in the published lift-induced drag and vortex trajectory. In this experiment, the ground boundary condition-produced disparity in the vortex strength and induced drag were evaluated. No significant discrepancy appeared for a ground distance or clearance larger than 30% chord. As the stationary ground was further approached, there was the appearance of a corotating ground vortex (GV), originated from the downstream progression of a spanwise ground vortex filament, which added vorticity to the tip vortex, leading to a stronger tip vortex and a larger lift-induced drag compared to the moving ground. For the moving ground, the ground vortex was absent. In close ground proximity, the rollup of the high-pressure fluid flow escaped from the wing's tip always caused the formation of a counter-rotating secondary vortex, which dramatically weakened the tip vortex strength and produced a large induced-drag reduction. The moving ground effect, however, induced a stronger secondary vortex, leading to a smaller lift-induced drag and a larger outboard movement of the tip vortex as compared to the stationary ground effect.


2020 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 964-973
Author(s):  
Sheng Zhai ◽  
Chunzhi Li ◽  
Chengcai Wang ◽  
Jianying Yang

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (9) ◽  
pp. 095102
Author(s):  
S. N. Skinner ◽  
R. B. Green ◽  
H. Zare-Behtash

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document