Seasonal variability in copepod biomass in a cyclonic eddy in the Bay of La Paz, southern Gulf of California, Mexico

As one of the main groups composing marine zooplankton, copepods play an important role due to the position they occupy in the trophic web. Study of their biomass and relationship with the physical conditions of the water column are essential in order to evaluate the trophic structure and functions of any aquatic ecosystem. As a contribution to this topic, we assessed the copepod biomass inside a cyclonic eddy system during two different seasons in the Bay of La Paz in the southern Gulf of California, a region characterized by high biological productivity. Two oceanographic expeditions took place in the winter of 2006 and summer of 2009 on which a conductivity-temperature-depth (CTD) probe was used to determine the physical structure of the water column and oblique zooplankton hauls collected zooplankton samples. Satellite data were used to visualize chlorophyll-a distribution patterns. The results showed the presence of a well-defined mesoscale cyclonic eddy in both seasons, with high chlorophyll-a (CHLA) values at the edges of the eddy. Maximum values for copepod biomass were observed in winter and their distribution corresponded well with the circulation pattern and the CHLA values, forming a belt shape following the periphery of the eddy. The results presented herein highlight the impact of the mesoscale eddy on the planktonic ecosystem through its influence on hydrographic conditions in the water column. Other factors, such as ecological interactions, population dynamics, and feeding habits may play a role as well. Feeding behavior in particular is affected by high CHLA concentrations observed around the eddy which represent a source of food for these organisms.

Hypolimnetic Hypoxia Increases the Biomass Variability and Compositional Variability of Crustacean Zooplankton Communities

In freshwater lakes and reservoirs, climate change and eutrophication are increasing the occurrence of low-dissolved oxygen concentrations (hypoxia), which has the potential to alter the variability of zooplankton seasonal dynamics. We sampled zooplankton and physical, chemical and biological variables (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen, and chlorophyll a) in four reservoirs during the summer stratified period for three consecutive years. The hypolimnion (bottom waters) of two reservoirs remained oxic throughout the entire stratified period, whereas the hypolimnion of the other two reservoirs became hypoxic during the stratified period. Biomass variability (measured as the coefficient of the variation of zooplankton biomass) and compositional variability (measured as the community composition of zooplankton) of crustacean zooplankton communities were similar throughout the summer in the oxic reservoirs; however, biomass variability and compositional variability significantly increased after the onset of hypoxia in the two seasonally-hypoxic reservoirs. The increase in biomass variability in the seasonally-hypoxic reservoirs was driven largely by an increase in the variability of copepod biomass, while the increase in compositional variability was driven by increased variability in the dominance (proportion of total crustacean zooplankton biomass) of copepod taxa. Our results suggest that hypoxia may increase the seasonal variability of crustacean zooplankton communities.

Analyzing the effects of four submerged macrophytes with two contrasting architectures on zooplankton: A mesocosm experiment

<p>Increases in the structural complexity of submerged macrophytes are often shown to be linked to higher invertebrate abundance and diversity, but a number of studies have demonstrated, however, that this is not always the case. The objective of this study was to analyze the effects of four macrophyte species with two contrasting architectures (simple architecture with broad leaves: <em>Vallisneria spiralis</em> L. and <em>Potamogeton malaianus</em> Miq. and complex architecture with finely dissected leaves: <em>Ceratophyllum demersum</em> L. and <em>Myriophyllum verticillatum </em>L.) on zooplanktons. We hypothesized that structurally more complex macrophytes would support more zooplanktons and higher diversity, species richness, abundance and biomass, and to test our hypotheses, zooplankton samples within the above-mentioned macrophytes were collected to analyze the variances at different times. Contrary to our expectations, we found that the zooplankton’ responses were independent to the macrophyte architecture. Specially, although finely dissected<em> M</em>.<em> verticillatum</em> could significantly increase total zooplanktons, diversity, species richness, rotifers and cladocerans than the other three macrophytes, the effects of finely dissected <em>C</em>.<em> demersum</em> on these parameters exhibited no significant differences compared to two broad leaved macrophytes (<em>V</em>.<em> spiralis</em> and <em>P</em>.<em> malaianus</em>). Moreover, broad leaved macrophytes even increased more abundance zooplanktons than finely dissected <em>C</em>.<em> demersum</em>. In addition, the effects of macrophytes on zooplanktons also varied with zooplankton species. For example, the four tested macrophytes could significantly increase cladoceran abundance and biomass. Yet for copepods, the density was significantly increased<em> </em>in presence of <em>V</em>.<em> spiralis</em> and <em>C</em>.<em> demersum</em>, but<em> P</em>.<em> malaianus </em>and<em> M</em>.<em> verticillatum</em> did not show significant effects on copepod density. Moreover, all the tested macrophytes except for <em>V</em>.<em> spiralis</em> even significantly suppress copepod biomass. Therefore, our results did not support the hypothesis that structurally complex macrophytes harbor more zooplanktons, and showed that the effects of the investigated macrophytes on zooplanktons were not likely to depend on their architectures, but seemed to rely on complex relationships between macrophyte and zooplankton species.</p>