Ultrasonic guided wave-based debond identification in a GFRP plate with L-stiffener

This paper presents a robust assessment of debond in a glass fibre-reinforced polymer composite structure with L-stiffener attachment. Towards this, the ultrasonic guided wave (GW) propagation based laboratory experiments have been carried out on a stiffened composite panel with piezoelectric transducers (PZT) for the excitation of GWs and a scanning laser Doppler vibrometer (SLDV) for sensing the GW propagation. To study the changes caused by the stiffener and debond a signal processing based multi-point analysis has been carried out. The proposed methodology consists of two steps. Step 1 using the full wavefield root mean square energy map-based approach to check the presence of debond. Step 2 using point-wise measurements to study debond localization and size estimation using a baseline free signal coefficient difference algorithm (SCDA). The proposed processing approaches are applied for an in-depth analysis of the experimental signals that provide information about the interaction of GWs with stiffener and debond. The mentioned approaches take advantage of the asymmetry caused by the damage. For the applied SCDA methodology there is no need for full-wavefield measurements, healthy case measurements, as only a few measurement points can be enough for the assessment of stiffener debond in such structures.

Experimental study on the damage monitoring of a Pi-type pipeline based on ultrasonic guided waves

Aiming at the damage of the prefabricated counter bore at the elbow of the scribble pressure pipeline, a test system is established based on the ultrasonic guided wave technology, and the end echo interference is eliminated by arranging a multi-channel sensor array to achieve accurate positioning of the pipeline damage and return the measured damage Comparing the wave amplitude value with the 3% DAC curve to calculate the pipe damage cross-sectional loss rate, the test results show that the average relative error between the monitored damage cross-sectional loss rate and the actual cross-sectional loss rate is 3.46%, and the average relative error of damage location is 2.05%.