alternation task
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

75
(FIVE YEARS 8)

H-INDEX

27
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (38) ◽  
pp. 7311-7317 ◽  
Author(s):  
David B. Kastner ◽  
Anna K. Gillespie ◽  
Peter Dayan ◽  
Loren M. Frank

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas CS Tavares ◽  
Adriano BL Tort

AbstractThe hippocampus has been linked to memory encoding and spatial navigation, while the prefrontal cortex is associated with cognitive functions such as decision-making. These regions are hypothesized to communicate in tasks that demand both spatial navigation and decision-making processes. However, the electrophysiological signatures underlying this communication remain to be better elucidated. To investigate the dynamics of the hippocampal-prefrontal interactions, we have analyzed their local field potentials and spiking activity recorded from rats performing an odor-cued spatial alternation task in an 8-shaped maze. We found that the phase coherence of theta peaked around the choice point area of the maze. Moreover, Granger causality revealed a hippocampus->prefrontal cortex directionality of information flow at theta frequency, peaking at starting areas of the maze, and on the reverse direction at delta frequency, peaking near the turn onset. Additionally, the patterns of phase-amplitude cross-frequency coupling within and between the regions also showed spatial selectivity, and a new method revealed that hippocampal theta and prefrontal delta modulated not only gamma amplitude but also inter-regional gamma synchrony. Lastly, we found that the theta rhythm dynamically modulated neurons in both regions, with the highest modulation at the choice area; interestingly, prefrontal cortex neurons were more strongly modulated by the hippocampal theta rhythm than by their local field rhythm. In all, our results reveal maximum electrophysiological interactions between the hippocampus and the prefrontal cortex near the decision-making period of the spatial alternation task. These results corroborate the hypothesis that a dynamic interplay between these regions takes place during spatial decisions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 77 ◽  
pp. 71-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan K. Horton ◽  
Laura Zheng ◽  
Ashley Williams ◽  
John T. Doucette ◽  
Katherine Svensson ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
David B. Kastner ◽  
Eric A. Miller ◽  
Zhounan Yang ◽  
Demetris K. Roumis ◽  
Daniel F. Liu ◽  
...  

AbstractIndividual animals perform tasks in different ways, yet the nature and origin of that variability is poorly understood. In the context of spatial memory tasks, variability is often interpreted as resulting from differences in memory ability, but the validity of this interpretation is seldom tested since we lack a systematic approach for identifying and understanding factors that make one animal’s behavior different than another. Here we identify such factors in the context of spatial alternation in rats, a task often described as relying solely on memory of past choices. We combine hypothesis-driven behavioral design and reinforcement learning modeling to identify spatial preferences that, when combined with memory, support learning of a spatial alternation task. Identifying these preferences allows us to capture differences among animals, including differences in overall learning ability. Our results show that to understand the complexity of behavior requires quantitative accounts of the preferences of each animal.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathaniel R. Kinsky ◽  
William Mau ◽  
David W. Sullivan ◽  
Samuel J. Levy ◽  
Evan A. Ruesch ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTTrajectory-dependent splitter neurons in the hippocampus encode information about a rodent’s prior trajectory during performance of a continuous alternation task. As such, they provide valuable information for supporting memory-guided behavior. Here, we employed single-photon calcium imaging in freely moving mice to investigate the emergence and fate of trajectory-dependent activity through learning and mastery of a continuous spatial alternation task. We found that the quality of trajectory-dependent information in hippocampal neurons correlated with task performance. We thus hypothesized that, due to their utility, splitter neurons would exhibit heightened stability. We found that splitter neurons were more likely to remain active and retained more consistent spatial information across multiple days than did place cells. Furthermore, we found that both splitter neurons and place cells emerged rapidly and maintained stable trajectory-dependent/spatial activity thereafter. Our results suggest that neurons with useful functional coding properties exhibit heightened stability to support memory guided behavior.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin D. Shin ◽  
Wenbo Tang ◽  
Shantanu P. Jadhav

SUMMARYSpatial learning requires remembering and choosing paths to goals. Hippocampal place cells replay spatial paths during immobility in reverse and forward order, offering a potential mechanism. However, how replay mediates both goal-directed learning and memory-guided decision making is unclear. We therefore continuously tracked replay in the same hippocampal-prefrontal ensembles throughout learning of a spatial alternation task. We found that during pauses between behavioral trajectories, awake reverse and forward hippocampal replay consistently mediated an internal cognitive search of all available past and future possibilities, and exhibited opposing learning gradients for prediction of past and future behavioral paths, respectively. Coordinated hippocampal-prefrontal replay mediated recall of correct past paths and selection of future choices leading to reward based on the hippocampal cognitive search, executing spatial working memory rules. Our findings reveal a learning shift from hippocampal reverse-replay-based retrospective evaluation to forward-replay-based prospective planning, with prefrontal filtering of memory-guided paths for learning and decision-making.


2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (6) ◽  
pp. 512-519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adele J. Kapellusch ◽  
Adam W. Lester ◽  
Benjamin A. Schwartz ◽  
Anne C. Smith ◽  
Carol A. Barnes

2016 ◽  
Vol 56 ◽  
pp. 287-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle C. Janelsins ◽  
Charles E. Heckler ◽  
Bryan D. Thompson ◽  
Robert A. Gross ◽  
Lisa A. Opanashuk ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document