scholarly journals Motivation Mechanism Prevents Adverse Selection in Industrial Technology Innovation Strategic Alliance

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingxia Zhao ◽  
Changhong Li
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Selection ◽  
Strategic Alliance ◽  
Technology Innovation ◽  
Industrial Technology ◽  
Game Model ◽  
Motivation Theory ◽  
Motivation Mechanism ◽  
Agent Theory ◽  
The One ◽  
Cooperative Organization

Choosing proper partners is the key to the success of the alliance. Based on the analysis of the characters of the Industrial Technology Innovation Strategic Alliance, a new kind of cooperative organization occurred in China in recent years. The problem of “adverse selection” at the stage of the its establishment is discussed in this paper. The game model is built based on motivation theory and the principle-agent theory and then proved by examples. The conclusions can be got from the model. By setting the ranges of funds, preferential policy, and sharable profits and designing membership rules, the organizer of the Industrial Technology Innovation Strategic Alliance can motivate the risk neutral applicant to reveal his real capacity and the one with higher capacity to participate intothe alliance more actively and even can set capacity threshold for applicants implicitly.

A Theory Model of the Existence Stable Measure for the Industrial Technology Innovation Strategy Alliance

2013 ◽  
Vol 401-403 ◽  
pp. 2193-2198
Author(s):  
Zhan Zhang ◽  
Bo Qin ◽  
Wei Dong Hu
Keyword(s):  
Risk Sharing ◽  
Technology Innovation ◽  
Theory Model ◽  
Innovation Strategy ◽  
Industrial Technology ◽  
Entropy Weight ◽  
Stable Measure ◽  
Measure Model ◽  
Entropy Weight Method ◽  
Questionnaire Method

This paper aims to establish a existence stable measure model. Use Alliance building, partner selection, the benefit and risk sharing, legal guarantee and policy guidance for one class index. Looking for data sources by Delphi method and questionnaire method and using the entropy weight method to Process those data. Through the model application can sum up the developing experience and provide reference for the Industrial technology innovation strategy alliances future development

Study on coordination of industrial technology ambidextrous innovation in knowledge ecology spiral

Kybernetes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pan Liu ◽  
Yue Long
Keyword(s):  
Technology Innovation ◽  
Coordination Mechanism ◽  
Volterra Model ◽  
Industrial Technology ◽  
Input Output ◽  
Profit Model ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Spiral Model ◽  
Knowledge Ecology ◽  
Innovation Chain

Purpose Knowledge input development and innovation implementation are new features of industrial technology innovation. The purpose of this study is to find the process of coordination and ecological spiral in the ambidextrous innovation of industrial technology. Design/methodology/approach To design the model of industrial technology ambidextrous innovation based on knowledge ecology spiral, an input-output model of knowledge for ambidextrous innovation and a spiral model of knowledge ecology were constructed based on an improved Lotka-Volterra model. Then, the equilibriums in different knowledge inputs and the spiral evolution of knowledge ecology were analyzed. Finally, the ambidextrous coordination mechanism of the core organization was revealed. Findings By coordinating the knowledge inputs and the knowledge ecology spiral, enterprises extend the R&D investments in the innovation chain, which will facilitate the knowledge inputs of the exploitative and exploratory innovation. Implementing the ambidextrous coordination in the technology innovation chain and the knowledge ecology chain has the advantage of promoting knowledge inputs, mobility and ecological spiral. Meanwhile, it can achieve the “multi-source, integration and coordination” development of industrial technology innovation. Originality/value The two-element innovative knowledge input coordination model and the knowledge ecological spiral model based on the improved Lotka-Volterra model are constructed, which extends the modeling way of the traditional knowledge input-output profit model. It is expected to reduce the amount of knowledge input of a single member and provide theoretical reference for improving the efficiency of knowledge input by constructing the inter-dependent regenerative and inter-generative knowledge interaction.

scholarly journals La experiencia boliviana y la organización comunitaria cooperativa en el marco de la economía plural

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Loza
Keyword(s):  
Informal Sector ◽  
Social Solidarity ◽  
Public Enterprises ◽  
Solidarity Economy ◽  
Public Companies ◽  
Palabras Clave ◽  
Peasant Community ◽  
The One ◽  
Cooperative Organization ◽  
Made In

<p>El autor sostiene que, a diferencia de lo que postula el Modelo de Economía Plural, el proceso de avance en la realidad boliviana es desigual, dado que, por una parte, se ha centrado en la nacionalización y en las empresas públicas, y, por otra, se asienta en la forma de organización cooperativa en el sector minero y en el sector informal de la economía, relegando la economía solidaria, en un contexto con alta desprotección social, informal y capitalista. No se observan avances en un socialismo comunitario, puesto que el peso y la importancia de la comunidad campesina se ha mantenido relativamente igual con relación a los gobiernos anteriores, salvo la economía campesina de la coca, basada en pequeños propietarios y escasa tradición comunitaria.</p><p>Palabras clave: Economía Social Solidaria, Economía Plural, Nacionalismo, Empresas Públicas</p><p><em><br /></em></p><p><em><br /></em></p><p><em>The Bolivian experience and the community and cooperative organization within the framework of the plural economy</em></p><p><em>The author argues that, unlike what postulated Model Plural Economy, the process advance in the Bolivian reality is uneven, since on the one hand, has focused on nationalization and public enterprises, and, on another, sits in the form of cooperative organization in the mining sector and the informal sector of the economy, relegating the solidarity economy, in a context with high social, informal and capitalist vulnerability. No progress has been made in a community socialism, since the weight and importance of the peasant community has remained relatively unchanged compared to previous governments, except the peasant coca economy based on small landowners and little community tradition.<br /></em></p><p><em>Keywords: Social Solidarity Economy, Plural Economy, Nationalization and Public Companies</em></p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document