scholarly journals On Fourier Coefficients of Siegel Modular Forms of Degree Two

1975 ◽  
Vol 97 (3) ◽  
pp. 829 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik A. Lippa
Keyword(s):  
Modular Forms ◽  
Fourier Coefficients ◽  
Siegel Modular Forms

ON THE FOURIER COEFFICIENTS OF SIEGEL MODULAR FORMS

2016 ◽  
Vol 234 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
SIEGFRIED BÖCHERER ◽  
WINFRIED KOHNEN
Keyword(s):  
Modular Form ◽  
Modular Forms ◽  
Fourier Coefficients ◽  
Main Tool ◽  
Siegel Modular Forms ◽  
Cusp Forms ◽  
Growth Properties

One can characterize Siegel cusp forms among Siegel modular forms by growth properties of their Fourier coefficients. We give a new proof, which works also for more general types of modular forms. Our main tool is to study the behavior of a modular form for $Z=X+iY$ when $Y\longrightarrow 0$.

scholarly journals Restriction of Siegel modular forms to modular curves

2002 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 239-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cris Poor ◽  
David S. Yuen
Keyword(s):  
Modular Form ◽  
Modular Forms ◽  
Fourier Coefficients ◽  
Congruence Subgroup ◽  
Siegel Modular Forms ◽  
Siegel Modular Form ◽  
Modular Curves ◽  
Linear Relations

We study homomorphisms form the ring of Siegel modular forms of a given degree to the ring of elliptic modular forms for a congruence subgroup. These homomorphisms essentially arise from the restriction of Siegel modular forms to modular curves. These homomorphisms give rise to linear relations among the Fourier coefficients of a Siegel modular form. We use this technique to prove that dim .

CONGRUENCES OF SAITO–KUROKAWA LIFTS AND DENOMINATORS OF CENTRAL SPINOR L-VALUES

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-22
Author(s):  
NEIL DUMMIGAN
Keyword(s):  
Recent Work ◽  
Modular Forms ◽  
Fourier Coefficients ◽  
Siegel Modular Forms ◽  
Hecke Eigenvalues ◽  
Genus 2

Abstract Following Ryan and Tornaría, we prove that moduli of congruences of Hecke eigenvalues, between Saito–Kurokawa lifts and non-lifts (certain Siegel modular forms of genus 2), occur (squared) in denominators of central spinor L-values (divided by twists) for the non-lifts. This is conditional on Böcherer’s conjecture and its analogues and is viewed in the context of recent work of Furusawa, Morimoto and others. It requires a congruence of Fourier coefficients, which follows from a uniqueness assumption or can be proved in examples. We explain these factors in denominators via a close examination of the Bloch–Kato conjecture.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document