scholarly journals Methodological problems of interconnection of strategic planning documents of the federal level, developed within the framework of the target on sectoral and territorial principles (part 2)

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 9-13
Author(s):  
O.P. Lichichan ◽  
◽  
I.A. Arzumanov ◽  
S.I. Shishkin ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Strategic Planning ◽  
Goal Setting ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
The State ◽  
Federal Level ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
Methodological Problems ◽  
The Russian Federation

The analysis of methodological problems of interrelation of the documents of strategic planning of the federal level, developed within the framework of goal-setting according to the sectoral and territorial principles, is directly linked to the issues of settlement. The article considers the norms of the corpus of federal regulatory legal acts adopted within the framework of goal-setting in the process of strategic planning of socio-economic development of territories, which includes the provisions of the norms of the Strategy of Socio-economic Development of the Russian Federation, Federal Law No. 172 “On Strategic Planning”, the Urban Planning Code of the Russian Federation, the Resolutions of the Government of the Russian Federation related to the role of local self-government bodies in the implementation of the settlement policy as a factor of socio-economic development of territories. The specifics of the federal policy of territorial development of the regions, which is based on the participation of not only the federal center, but also the state bodies of the regional level of the vertical of power, are revealed. It is argued that the existing “vertical” of public administration does not include an imperative function in relation to the local authorities, which are not assigned the responsibility of developing strategies for the socio-economic development of the municipality. It is determined that, in methodological terms, such consequences should include the need to differentiate measures of state support for municipal territorial entities, regional typologization of settlements when considering budget and urban development policies. The problems related to the legal nature of the federal district in relation to the nature and powers in the field of strategic planning of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation are identified. It is argued that the factors influencing the processes of formation and implementation of the state policy of regional development and directly related to the issues of strategic planning include not only the features of the federal structure, geo-political, geo-deterministic, socio-cultural factors, but also a significant difference in the levels of regional socio-economic development and territorial population. The analysis of methodological problems of interrelation of the documents of strategic planning of the federal level, developed within the framework of goal-setting according to the sectoral and territorial principles, is directly linked to the issues of settlement. The article considers the norms of the corpus of federal regulatory legal acts adopted within the framework of goal-setting in the process of strategic planning of socio-economic development of territories, which includes the provisions of the norms of the Strategy of Socio-economic Development of the Russian Federation, Federal Law No. 172 “On Strategic Planning”, the Urban Planning Code of the Russian Federation, the Resolutions of the Government of the Russian Federation related to the role of local self-government bodies in the implementation of the settlement policy as a factor of socio-economic development of territories. The specifics of the federal policy of territorial development of the regions, which is based on the participation of not only the federal center, but also the state bodies of the regional level of the vertical of power, are revealed. It is argued that the existing “vertical” of public administration does not include an imperative function in relation to the local authorities, which are not assigned the responsibility of developing strategies for the socio-economic development of the municipality. It is determined that, in methodological terms, such consequences should include the need to differentiate measures of state support for municipal territorial entities, regional typologization of settlements when considering budget and urban development policies. The problems related to the legal nature of the federal district in relation to the nature and powers in the field of strategic planning of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation are identified. It is argued that the factors influencing the processes of formation and implementation of the state policy of regional development and directly related to the issues of strategic planning include not only the features of the federal structure, geo-political, geo-deterministic, socio-cultural factors, but also a significant difference in the levels of regional socio-economic development and territorial population.

scholarly journals Methodological Problems of Interconnection of Strategic Planning Documents of the Federal Level, Developed within the Framework of the Target on Sectoral and Territorial Principles (Part 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 30-36
Author(s):  
O.P. Lichichan ◽  
◽  
I.A. Arzumanov ◽  
F.S. Galenpol'skij ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Strategic Planning ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
The Body ◽  
Federal Level ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
Methodological Problems ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Relationship Of

A study of methodological problems related to the relationship of strategic planning documents of the federal level, developed within the framework of the target plan on sectoral and territorial principles, was carried out. The norms of the body of regulatory legal acts of the federal level adopted within the framework of the goal in the process of strategic planning of socio-economic development of territories, including the annual message of the President of the Russian Federation to the Federal Assembly of theRussian Federation, the strategy of socio-economic development of the Russian Federation, the strategy of national security of the Russian Federation and the strategy of scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation, were considered. The specifics of the Messages of the President of the Russian Federation to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation as documents defining budget policy and requirements for it were revealed. The provisions of Federal Law No. 172 “On Strategic Planning” devoted to the “Strategy for the Socio-Economic Development of the Russian Federation” were analyzed. The consequences of the non-adoption of this document at the present stage have been analyzed. It is argued that methodological implications include the lack of a systematic link between strategic planning documents, the necessary statistical development of core resource indicators across the country and across regions, which affects the quality of strategic planning documents, and the effectiveness of their implementation. It is determined that spatial strategy, being an independent direction of strategic planning, should be “horizontally” consistent with strategic planning documents of an industry nature, and“vertically” with strategic spatial (territorial) planning documents formed at both the regional and municipal levels. A number of theoretical and methodological provisions have been identified and systematized, reflecting the systemic relationship of strategic planning documents adopted within the framework of the goal. It is argued that the factors influencing the formation and implementation of State policies for regional development and directly related to strategic planning include not only the characteristics of the federal structure, geopolitical, geodesic, socio-cultural factors, but also a significant difference in the levels of regional socio-economic development and territorial population.

scholarly journals Philosophical collisions of «The strategic planning» and its low support

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (2) ◽  
pp. 17-28
Author(s):  
V Domakov ◽  
Vladimir Matveev
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Strategic Planning ◽  
Goal Setting ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
The Real ◽  
Management Board ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
The Russian Federation

State of matter: The vital activity of society through the enrichment of its en-trepreneurial part, with the a priori assumption is as soon as it is enriched, universal prosperity will immediately come at all times served by a legalized open (pro-grammed) “direction” with a personification and violent character. When conducting business activities - open (program) management, which was called "management". The concern of managers about the imperfection of the “rule” method and the power, which is a form of its expression, has led to the emergence of unique ideas about “strategic planning”. This concept was introduced in the Federal Law of the Russian Federation dated June 28, 2014 N 172 “On Strategic Planning in the Russian Federation”. However, in the adopted law the proposals by unknown authors about “strategic planning” turned out to be connected with serious semantic conflicts regarding its essence, content and form. Results: As a result of the analysis of the essence, content and form of the cate-gory “planning” and the category «strategic», it was found that the phrase «strategic planning» cannot include «goal-setting, forecasting, planning and programming of socio-economic development», since «planning» is an integral part of «board» and «management (board)», and the combination of «goal-setting, forecasting and pro-gramming of socio-economic development» has nothing to do with the content of the concept of «strategic». In this regard, «strategic planning» can only be considered as a «doctrine of the preliminary distribution of all available forces and means for their best location and use, ensuring the realization of the formulated goal at a given time interval and the solution at this interval, taking into account the real conditions set for its achievement tasks», which is fully consistent with the essence, content and form of the category «plan». The scope of the results: The results can be widely used in practice in a con-stantly changing objective reality. Conclusions: In the real constantly changing environment of being, only the legalized method of “managing” with its characteristic closed functional and organizational structures can ensure the creation of conditions for extracting the most useful properties from any property.

scholarly journals Competitive policy in the strategic planning system

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (79) ◽  
pp. 28-40
Author(s):  
I. R. Kurnysheva ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Strategic Planning ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
The State ◽  
Transport Infrastructure ◽  
Planning System ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
Competitive Relations ◽  
The Russian Federation

The article considers the potential of linking the methodology and tools of competition policy with the main mechanisms of strategic management planning aimed at achieving the priority goals of the state, including the processes of goal setting, forecasting and planning the socio-economic development of the Russian Federation and the positive dynamics of its competitiveness. The article analyzes the trends and highlights the principles of deployment of the process of forming a systemic springboard of competition institutions as an element of state economic policy. Special attention is paid to a new spatial strategy containing proposals to counteract inter-regional imbalances and mitigate imbalances in the socio-economic conditions of individual regions. The main trends and problems of development of the national economic space are analyzed. The role of the human factor as a leading specific factor in competitive relations is emphasized. The author analyzes regional development imbalances that are systemic in nature and, of course, have a negative impact on markets and the quality of their competitive environment, as well as macroeconomic indicators. The role of transport infrastructure in reducing the level of interregional differentiation in the socio-economic development of the subjects of the Russian Federation and stimulating competitive relations is updated. The assessment of the level of competition development in the country is given; the work carried out by the state at all hierarchical levels of the economy in the field of competition development, including the influence of the state on business activity. There are two main directions of activation of competitive relations in the framework of strategic planning: methodological and organizational and economic.

scholarly journals Analysis of the State and Characteristics of the Development Potential of Strategic Planning Tools in the Digital Transformation Conditions of the Economy and Management

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 502-529 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. M. Pisareva
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Strategic Planning ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Digital Transformation ◽  
The State ◽  
Planning System ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Multi Level ◽  
The Creation

Purpose:the purpose of the study is to determine the main directions and conceptual approaches to modernizing analytical and computer support for the planning of strategic development of socio-economic systems on a national scale in the framework of improving the methodology of strategic planning in a digital transformation of the economy and management.Methods:the issues of improving the tools of strategic planning of socio-economic development are studied in the framework of a system approach to analyzing the construction and functioning of the state management mechanism in the context of active formation of the information society infrastructure and to evaluating of the impact of digital technologies on the content of management tasks in the process of co-evolution of objects and subjects of management in large-scale organizational systems.Results:the article deals with current problems and key tasks of modernization of scientific and methodological, informational and analytical support of state strategic management of socio-economic development. The trends of the evolution of objects and subjects of management in the conditions of the digital transformation of the information society are investigated. The institutional bases for the construction and operation of the strategic planning system of the Russian Federation are characterized. A block diagram of a complex of heterogeneous models of strategic planning of socio-economic development is given. Design solutions are proposed for building the architecture and developing a prototype of the computer support system for the scenario modeling technology when developing multi-level strategic decisions for planning socio-economic development in the emerging infrastructure of the digital economy is presented.Conclusions and Relevance:the study showed the importance and relevance of modernization of the methodological and analytical support of the strategic planning system of the Russian Federation, which takes into account the main consequences and requirements of the creation and distribution of digital technologies in various areas of society. The most important characteristics of innovative changes in the structure and content of strategic planning tasks, the solution of which is associated with the unification of the format of quantitative and qualitative assessments in the digital development management environment, are identified. Standardization of technologies for collecting, transmitting, storing and processing large amounts of data allows you to build computer software for the multi-level system of state strategic planning based on an open service-oriented architecture. The main direction of further research and development in the creation of an analytical platform to support strategic planning of socio-economic development can be the creation of a mathematical apparatus and software products for processing and analyzing large amounts of personalized information about the functioning of economic and social agents to identify and assess their potentials and priorities. This will allow to increase the degree of justification and consistency of planned decisions and regulatory measures developed by the state in the field of planning socio-economic development and ensuring the national security of the Russian Federation.

Goal-Setting Model in Multilevel State Strategic Management of Socio-Economic Development

2021 ◽  
pp. 52-76
Author(s):  
Olga M. Pisareva
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Theoretical Model ◽  
Strategic Planning ◽  
Goal Setting ◽  
Development Planning ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Multi Level ◽  
Strategic Goal

In the context of the deployment of transient processes and the exacerbation of crisis phenomena in socio-economic systems of various types, the importance of a reasonable setting and correction of development goals increases. For the current situation in the Russian Federation, when the implemented program of constitutional amendments creates the preconditions for the subsequent reform of public authorities and the mechanism of multi-level strategic planning, it is especially important to conduct research in the field of substantiating scientific approaches to the development of mathematical methods for solving the problem of strategic goal-setting. One of the key points in the modernization of the methodological support of strategic planning in the context of the constitutional transformation of the system of public authorities is consideration of the value foundations of activities in the systems of distributed management of socio-economic development, analysis of the problems of formalizing the setting of goals by the participants in the multi-level strategic planning process and substantiation of the structure of the theoretical model of goal-setting. The article considers the general characteristics of the functioning of the system of state strategic planning in the Russian Federation from the point of view of goal achievement. The institutional and conceptual foundations of goal setting are presented. The relationship between the concepts of “goal”, “target indicator” and “target function” are shown. The interrelation of the tasks of goal-setting and programming of the activity of an economic agent is characterized. An approach to formalizing goal-setting based on a theoretical scheme of mutual development planning tasks is proposed. The general structure of the strategic goal-setting model in the organizational mechanism of multi-level long-term planning determined. A possible approach to the algorithmization of the solution of the linear formulation of the goal-setting problem in the multisubject development control space based on the methods of target programming and multicriteria optimization was proposed. The formation of an operator of iterative management of the potentials and development priorities of interacting economic and social agents on the horizon of strategizing substantiated. To introduce a theoretical model of goal-setting into the practice of strategizing in the context of the formation of a digital platform of public administration, it is necessary to develop appropriate algorithmic support, as well as the formation of a regulatory and information base and the definition of an organizational and technological basis. Further improvement of the analytical and methodological tools for supporting the activities of strategic planning participants at the goal-setting stage is associated with the description and analysis of the corresponding applied tasks of goal setting at various levels and areas of socio-economic development planning.

scholarly journals Goal-Setting Models in Strategies of Constituent Entities of the Russian Federation

2021 ◽  
pp. 32-41
Author(s):  
Alyona Lyubina ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Strategic Planning ◽  
Goal Setting ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Consistent Model ◽  
Detailed Classification ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Social And Economic Development ◽  
The Russian Federation

The article reviews the legal and regulatory framework for strategic planning at the level of constituent entities of the Russian Federation and identifies problems of the used vocabulary. There is no distinction between the concepts of “strategic priorities”, “priorities of social and economic development”, “priorities of social and economic policy”, “directions of development”. The paper analyzed the content of the strategies of social and economic development of constituent entities of the Russian Federation with a view to existence and sequence of basic concepts of the system of goal setting: “mission”, “strategic priorities”, “goal”, “tasks”, “directions of development” as well as approaches to their essence and content. The main approach to the concept “strategic priority of social and economic development” is to identify it with the goal of social and economic development of the constituent entity (60% of the regions use this concept in the strategy of social and economic development). In addition, most part of constituent entities of the Russian Federation determine the goal of social and economic development as the “main” one, the second most popular is the “strategic” goal. It should be noted that in 6 constituent entities of the Russian Federation, no characteristics are attributed to the goal, and in another 18 regions the overall common goal is not identified. Two basic models of goal setting according to the presence of the mission of constituent entities of the Russian Federation are identified: the inside one (the closed one includes 54 constituent entities of the Russian Federation) and the outside one (the open one includes 31 constituent entities of the Russian Federation). The study offers a detailed classification of the models of goal-setting on the basis of the categories of strategic planning used in the strategies of social and economic development of constituent entities of the Russian Federation. The author suggests a logically consistent model of goal setting linked to other strategic planning documents, and the main tools for goal achievement. The practical use of study results is presented in the opportunity of their use by strategic planners of the region during the development of the strategy of its social and economic development.

scholarly journals Strategic planning of socio-economic development of a large city

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 125-134
Author(s):  
Tatiana Frolova
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Strategic Planning ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Large City ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
Strategic Goals ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation

The subject. The article shows the approaches to the process of creating and realizing strategiesof socio-economic development of the largest cities in the Russian Federation. Thestrategies of socio-economic development of the largest cities have been fundamental inthe formation of such city agglomerations as “Big Volgograd” (Volgograd), “Big Rostov”(Rostov), Zhigulevskaya agglomeration (Samara), Nizhegorodskaya agglomeration (NizhnyNovgorod), Chelyabinsk city agglomeration (Chelyabinsk) and these strategies contain themain ways of development which go far beyond the competence of local importance.The purpose. The article addresses the problems that arise in the process of creating strategiesof socio-economic development of the largest cities including the extent of powerbetween public authorities of different levels.The methodology. The systematic approach, methods of formal and comparative analysisof law as well as synthesis are used in the article.Results. Before the adoption of Federal Law “On the Strategic Planning in the Russian Federation”(further down the article 172-FZ) strategic planning was unsystematic and therewere no unitary law-based approaches towards the drafting process of strategic planningdocuments. After the adoption of 172-FZ the situation has not dramatically changed.The analysis of strategic planning in the largest cities shows the lack of unitary approachestowards the drafting process of strategic planning documents, the definitions of missionand strategic goals of development, the assessment of largest cities importance in the contextof over-regional, regional and internal city area development. Also, the peculiarities ofterritorial planning and budgetary process in municipal establishments are not taken intoconsideration.

scholarly journals INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT OF THE QUALITY OF SERVICES AS A TOOL FOR ANALYSIS OF ACHIEVING THE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT GOALS

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (44) ◽  
pp. 99-114
Author(s):  
S.A. Petrova ◽  
◽  
G.N. Grigor’yants ◽  
I.A. Yasinskaya ◽  
Yu.A. Aleksentseva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Public Organizations ◽  
The State ◽  
Social Sphere ◽  
The Social ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Independent Assessment

The relevance of an independent assessment of the quality of the conditions for the delivery of services (IAQ) as a tool for assessing the state of the social sphere is determined by the ability to use it to identify the expectations of a modern consumer, his needs, to detail shortcomings in the delivery of services and develop measures to eliminate them. Independent assessment acts as a form of public control, contributing to the development of civil society, allowing to eliminate problems and improve the system of providing services in the social sphere. The aim of the study is to consider the potential of using IAQ in solving problems of public administration. The research methods used in the work serve as a significant empirical base based on the results of monitoring studies of the implementation of IAQ in the regions of the Russian Federation based on surveys of government representatives and citizens who receive services, as well as on the basis of information provided on the official website for posting information about state (municipal) institutions bus.gov.ru, and have a formal and logical component in terms of conducting a comparative analysis of regulatory sources, using analytical methods of functional and statistical analysis. The choice of research tools was determined by the presence in the current database of the functioning of the IAQ from the moment of its creation in 2013 to the present. The analysis of the results of an independent quality assessment made it possible to identify key shortcomings in the social sphere, the structure of problems that are most often found in the regions and their relationship with the main directions of socio-economic development of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. According to the results of the study, the hypothesis was confirmed that the incorporation of an independent assessment into the system of executive authorities, which allows to quickly obtain objective data on the state of the social sphere, makes it possible to put its results into practice aiming to analyze the achievement of national goals and ensuring the socio-economic development of Russia. The use of the results of the IAQ to increase the validity and efficiency of management decisions to improve the activities of public organizations for officials of state authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation and representatives of public organizations responsible for their development, allows for a comprehensive impact on improving the quality of life of the population.

Mortgage Lending Market in Modern Russia: a Multidimensional Approach .

Vestnik NSUEM ◽  
2022 ◽  
pp. 144-165
Author(s):  
L. P. Bakumenko ◽  
I. A. Lipatova
Keyword(s):  
Cluster Analysis ◽  
Economic Development ◽  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Mortgage Lending ◽  
The State ◽  
Multidimensional Approach ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
The Russian Federation

The market of one of the most basic participants of the market of housing and communal services – credit organizations is considered. A statistical analysis of mortgage housing lending in Russia was carried out, the classification of the regions of the Russian Federation according to two groups of indicators was carried out: according to the indicators of the housing and communal services market and indicators of the level of socio-economic development of regions by cluster analysis methods and it was shown that not all regions (36 regions) correspond to their levels of groups according to two groups of indicators. The reasons for the development of regions according to the state of development of the housing and communal services market are revealed.

The problems of sustainable development of country areas in modern conditions

2021 ◽  
pp. 432-438
Author(s):  
Sagaydak A.A. Sagaydak A.A. ◽  
M.S. Seljanskij
Keyword(s):  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Economic Development ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
The State ◽  
Integrated Development ◽  
Federal Target Program ◽  
State Program ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
Target Program ◽  
The Russian Federation

The article considers the issues of socio-economic development and assessment of socio-economic indicators of country areas in the period of application of the Federal target program "Sustainable development of country areas in 2014-2017 and up to 2020". The measures provided by the state program of the Russian Federation "Integrated development of country areas" are considered and evaluated in this paper as well.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document