scholarly journals RESEARCH OF THE CONTENT OF THE STRATEGY OF DEVELOPMENT OF THE INVESTMENT AND CONSTRUCTION COMPLEX AND METHODOLOGICAL BASIS OF ITS FORMATION

Author(s):  
Sergii Simak

Crisis phenomena in the construction industry have given a powerful impetus to rethink the causes of problems and find new, free from pre-crisis defects mechanisms for its further development. The three-pronged mission of the state in the new conditions is to regulate the macroeconomic role of the investment and construction complex, the mechanism of economic relations of its participants and ensure the effectiveness of project decisions. State regulation of the development of the investment and construction complex in Ukraine is based on the principles of reactive strategic planning and is aimed at solving urgent social and economic problems. In the process of further development, the state in developing a strategy for the development of construction set goals and objectives that correspond to the priority areas of economic and / or social policy. Strengthening Ukraine's economic development requires a transition from a strategy of adaptation and mobilization to a strategy of modernization and further growth based on an innovative approach, which includes the selection of effective institutions and tools for socio-economic development. Strategic planning is a special type of management activity, which consists in the development of strategic decisions that provide for the establishment of such goals and behavioral strategies of management objects, the implementation of which ensures their effective functioning in the long run, rapid adaptation to changing environmental conditions. We believe that the Ukrainian approach to modern strategic spatial planning should be based on existing traditions of long-term spatial planning, modernized using modern technologies based on the principles and methods of strategic management. The Strategy is developed taking into account the main ideas and results of official forecasts and programs. The purpose, tasks and projects of the Strategy become elements of planning for all participants of its development and implementation. Thus, from the point of view of the regulatory framework, the strategy of development of the investment and construction complex is a component of the strategy of social and economic development of the state at the state level and socio - economic development of the region at the regional level. However, it is impossible to state unequivocally about the secondary strategy of the investment and construction complex in relation to the development strategy. After all, when developing a strategy, the scenario conditions are the starting point, including the state of fixed assets, which directly depends on the results of support and development of the investment and construction complex.

2019 ◽  
pp. 43-53
Author(s):  
Tetiana DALEVSKA

Introduction. In the conditions of the economy cyclicality and the imbalance of financial and economic relations, it is necessary to consider budget planning as one of the most important state regulation tools of the country’s socio-economic development. The issue of financial-budgetary planning is largely used separately from strategic planning issues. In addition, in modern economic science, Ukrainian scholars have not disclosed the question of its combination with the approaches of strategic planning of regional development, which is carried out on the basis of smart specialization. Purpose. To reveal approaches of improving the methodology of financial and budgetary planning by defining approaches of strengthening its interrelation with strategic planning on the basis of smart specialization, which will promote the effective use of the resourses of state regional development fund, increase the level region’ economic and innovative growth. Results. Financial-budgetary planning is a key instrument for managing the country’s financial system, which is closely linked to socio-economic and strategic planning of regional development, in particular. Currently, among the sources of regional development financing there resourses of the state fund of regional development, local budgets, international technical assistance (sectoral support programs, projects funded from the funds of the European Union). In 2019 30.8 bln UAH will be allocated for regional development (for comparison, in 2018 – UAH 25.4 billion). The largest amount of budget funds of the state fund of regional development in 2015–2018 was directed to financing projects in the field of education – 1066 million UAH, road infrastructure – 812.5 million UAH, physical culture – 284.4 million UAH, social protection – 100, 1 mln. UAH. At the same time,projects dedicated to the development of the economy, creation of new industries, development and implementation of innovations are remained unfulfilled. Today, in the European Union, the condition for obtaining funds for financing regional development is the availability of smart specialization strategy. Partnership, dialogue between business, science, public and government is a key condition for smart specialization. Conclusions. Financial and budgetary planning should be regarded as an instrument of state regulation of socio-economic development, which is represented by a set of organizational, methodological measures for determining the volumes, sources and directions of using budget funds in accordance with the results of strategic planning of regional development on the basis of smart specialization in order to ensure sustainable, innovative, economic development of regions.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 102-110
Author(s):  
N. P. Molchanova

The paper deals with the methodology and practice of the state regulation of the regional economy based on the legislative framework and works of Russian scientists in the historical context with account for the specifics of the current period of market transformation. The subject of research is organizational and economic relations, aimed at improving the management efficiency of regional socio-economic development. The purpose of research was to identify the key problems of the regional economy regulation preventing the balanced functioning of administrative-territorial entities and substantiate the need to boost measures of state support. Based on the dialectical cognition method and the system approach, the positions of leading scientists and scientific schools on topical issues of the regional economy as a scientific discipline were analyzed, which made it possible to identify the main reasons hampering socio-economic transformations and justify measures for running a more active regional policy. It is concluded that consistent improvement of methodological and organizational approaches creates prerequisites for improving the results of the socio-economic development at the regional level; however, in the current situation of the macroeconomic instability serious problems may arise to be resolved primarily by the state regulation.


2018 ◽  
pp. 45-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoryana LOBODINA

Introduction. The need to neutralize the threats to Ukraine's national security requires review of the priorities of public administration. Given the leading role of the budget as the imperative dominant of the system of state regulation of socio-economic development, the use of which is linked to the practical application of the budget mechanism of the socio-economic development of the state, the feasibility of modernizing the said mechanism is beyond doubt. The above circumstances determine the indisputable relevance of the study of the architecture of the budget mechanism and the search for ways to improve its structure, the integration of financial methods, forms, tools and instruments. Purposes. The purpose of the article is to formulate its own scientific approach to the structuring of the budget mechanism of the socio-economic development of the state, the characteristics of its elements and the relationship between them. Results.The result of the study proved that the optimal combination of elements of the budget mechanism allows the state to effectively influence the socio-economic processes, ensuring the functioning and development of the national economy, affordable and quality public services to the population, solving social problems and others. So in terms of transformation of budgetary relations and orientation of public finance to economic growth and improving public welfare scientific approaches to structuring the budget mechanism require revisionand clarification. Conclusion. Taking into account the directions of budget resources movement, the budget mechanism of the socio-economic development of the state proposes to distinguish two main subsystems: the mechanism of budget funds formation and the mechanism of using budget funds. In each of the subsystems, financial methods, forms, tools, levers are distinguished and characterized in the context of providing the architectural budget mechanism.


2021 ◽  
Vol 295 ◽  
pp. 01012
Author(s):  
Larisa Sokolova ◽  
Irina Kazantseva

The formation of methodological tools for the sustainable development of regions, the formation of an integrated system of strategic planning of socio-economic development at the municipal level is among the least developed topics. On the example of a municipality, the practice of developing strategic planning documents, their compliance with the requirements of the existing regulatory framework, the mechanism for implementing the strategy and ensuring its implementation with financial resources is studied. The factors influencing the formalization of the developed strategic landmarks of the territory are established. The article substantiates the need to supplement the algorithm of strategic planning of socio-economic development of municipalities of the regions with new methods of analyzing the construction of vertical and horizontal economic relations, in order to select options for structural transformations, as well as to determine the resource potential, including labor. Establishment of indicators of goal-setting in the social sphere and its direction.


2021 ◽  
Vol 284 ◽  
pp. 07012
Author(s):  
Guzaliya Klychova ◽  
Alsou Zakirova ◽  
Movlatkhan Shadieva ◽  
Ullah Raheem ◽  
Ayaz Zakirov

In modern conditions oil and gas sector is not only the largest sector of the economy, also this industry plays an important role in social and economic development of the state. In this regard, there is a need for effective regulation of the oil and gas complex, in particular, the state regulation. Market concentration indices CR-3, CR-4, Herfindahl-Hirschman index, Hall-Teidman index and Lind index have been calculated for competitive environment analysis. Having analyzed the competitive environment of the Russian oil market in 2015-2019, it was possible to find out that the Russian oil market in 2015-2016 was moderately concentrated, in 2017-2019 - highly concentrated; during the whole period under consideration the Russian oil market was a monopolistic competition market. The study also analyzed the impact of integration processes on the indicators of socio-economic development of the country. The analysis revealed that gross domestic product (GDP) and consolidated budget revenues are moderately strongly influenced by integration processes on the oil market; the volume of oil production with gas condensate is moderately influenced by them. At the same time, integration processes in the oil market do not have a significant impact on economic growth and foreign trade balance.


2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 323-332
Author(s):  
Наталья Блинова ◽  
Natalya Blinova

The article attempted to synthesize relevant scientific and public debate on the further development of local self-government in the Russian Federation. The author, based on the analysis of the dynamics of legislative changes, relevant scientific papers and discussion practitioners on various venues for the 2014-2015 year represents a slice of the key problems of the local self-government’s reform in Russia and gives a description of the risks and drivers of the local self-government’s development. The article presents the author´s suggestions for a draft strategy for socio-economic development of the Russian Federation up to the year 2030. One of the biggest problems the author highlights the absence to date of the State concept of local self-government. The author proposes to overcome chaos of reforming local government and enumerates a series of measures aimed at improving efficiency and consistency in the development of contemporary Russian zemstvo.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (79) ◽  
pp. 28-40
Author(s):  
I. R. Kurnysheva ◽  

The article considers the potential of linking the methodology and tools of competition policy with the main mechanisms of strategic management planning aimed at achieving the priority goals of the state, including the processes of goal setting, forecasting and planning the socio-economic development of the Russian Federation and the positive dynamics of its competitiveness. The article analyzes the trends and highlights the principles of deployment of the process of forming a systemic springboard of competition institutions as an element of state economic policy. Special attention is paid to a new spatial strategy containing proposals to counteract inter-regional imbalances and mitigate imbalances in the socio-economic conditions of individual regions. The main trends and problems of development of the national economic space are analyzed. The role of the human factor as a leading specific factor in competitive relations is emphasized. The author analyzes regional development imbalances that are systemic in nature and, of course, have a negative impact on markets and the quality of their competitive environment, as well as macroeconomic indicators. The role of transport infrastructure in reducing the level of interregional differentiation in the socio-economic development of the subjects of the Russian Federation and stimulating competitive relations is updated. The assessment of the level of competition development in the country is given; the work carried out by the state at all hierarchical levels of the economy in the field of competition development, including the influence of the state on business activity. There are two main directions of activation of competitive relations in the framework of strategic planning: methodological and organizational and economic.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 502-529 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. M. Pisareva

Purpose:the purpose of the study is to determine the main directions and conceptual approaches to modernizing analytical and computer support for the planning of strategic development of socio-economic systems on a national scale in the framework of improving the methodology of strategic planning in a digital transformation of the economy and management.Methods:the issues of improving the tools of strategic planning of socio-economic development are studied in the framework of a system approach to analyzing the construction and functioning of the state management mechanism in the context of active formation of the information society infrastructure and to evaluating of the impact of digital technologies on the content of management tasks in the process of co-evolution of objects and subjects of management in large-scale organizational systems.Results:the article deals with current problems and key tasks of modernization of scientific and methodological, informational and analytical support of state strategic management of socio-economic development. The trends of the evolution of objects and subjects of management in the conditions of the digital transformation of the information society are investigated. The institutional bases for the construction and operation of the strategic planning system of the Russian Federation are characterized. A block diagram of a complex of heterogeneous models of strategic planning of socio-economic development is given. Design solutions are proposed for building the architecture and developing a prototype of the computer support system for the scenario modeling technology when developing multi-level strategic decisions for planning socio-economic development in the emerging infrastructure of the digital economy is presented.Conclusions and Relevance:the study showed the importance and relevance of modernization of the methodological and analytical support of the strategic planning system of the Russian Federation, which takes into account the main consequences and requirements of the creation and distribution of digital technologies in various areas of society. The most important characteristics of innovative changes in the structure and content of strategic planning tasks, the solution of which is associated with the unification of the format of quantitative and qualitative assessments in the digital development management environment, are identified. Standardization of technologies for collecting, transmitting, storing and processing large amounts of data allows you to build computer software for the multi-level system of state strategic planning based on an open service-oriented architecture. The main direction of further research and development in the creation of an analytical platform to support strategic planning of socio-economic development can be the creation of a mathematical apparatus and software products for processing and analyzing large amounts of personalized information about the functioning of economic and social agents to identify and assess their potentials and priorities. This will allow to increase the degree of justification and consistency of planned decisions and regulatory measures developed by the state in the field of planning socio-economic development and ensuring the national security of the Russian Federation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 9-13
Author(s):  
O.P. Lichichan ◽  
◽  
I.A. Arzumanov ◽  
S.I. Shishkin ◽  
◽  
...  

The analysis of methodological problems of interrelation of the documents of strategic planning of the federal level, developed within the framework of goal-setting according to the sectoral and territorial principles, is directly linked to the issues of settlement. The article considers the norms of the corpus of federal regulatory legal acts adopted within the framework of goal-setting in the process of strategic planning of socio-economic development of territories, which includes the provisions of the norms of the Strategy of Socio-economic Development of the Russian Federation, Federal Law No. 172 “On Strategic Planning”, the Urban Planning Code of the Russian Federation, the Resolutions of the Government of the Russian Federation related to the role of local self-government bodies in the implementation of the settlement policy as a factor of socio-economic development of territories. The specifics of the federal policy of territorial development of the regions, which is based on the participation of not only the federal center, but also the state bodies of the regional level of the vertical of power, are revealed. It is argued that the existing “vertical” of public administration does not include an imperative function in relation to the local authorities, which are not assigned the responsibility of developing strategies for the socio-economic development of the municipality. It is determined that, in methodological terms, such consequences should include the need to differentiate measures of state support for municipal territorial entities, regional typologization of settlements when considering budget and urban development policies. The problems related to the legal nature of the federal district in relation to the nature and powers in the field of strategic planning of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation are identified. It is argued that the factors influencing the processes of formation and implementation of the state policy of regional development and directly related to the issues of strategic planning include not only the features of the federal structure, geo-political, geo-deterministic, socio-cultural factors, but also a significant difference in the levels of regional socio-economic development and territorial population. The analysis of methodological problems of interrelation of the documents of strategic planning of the federal level, developed within the framework of goal-setting according to the sectoral and territorial principles, is directly linked to the issues of settlement. The article considers the norms of the corpus of federal regulatory legal acts adopted within the framework of goal-setting in the process of strategic planning of socio-economic development of territories, which includes the provisions of the norms of the Strategy of Socio-economic Development of the Russian Federation, Federal Law No. 172 “On Strategic Planning”, the Urban Planning Code of the Russian Federation, the Resolutions of the Government of the Russian Federation related to the role of local self-government bodies in the implementation of the settlement policy as a factor of socio-economic development of territories. The specifics of the federal policy of territorial development of the regions, which is based on the participation of not only the federal center, but also the state bodies of the regional level of the vertical of power, are revealed. It is argued that the existing “vertical” of public administration does not include an imperative function in relation to the local authorities, which are not assigned the responsibility of developing strategies for the socio-economic development of the municipality. It is determined that, in methodological terms, such consequences should include the need to differentiate measures of state support for municipal territorial entities, regional typologization of settlements when considering budget and urban development policies. The problems related to the legal nature of the federal district in relation to the nature and powers in the field of strategic planning of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation are identified. It is argued that the factors influencing the processes of formation and implementation of the state policy of regional development and directly related to the issues of strategic planning include not only the features of the federal structure, geo-political, geo-deterministic, socio-cultural factors, but also a significant difference in the levels of regional socio-economic development and territorial population.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document