Global sea-level and ocean-mass budgets using advanced data products and uncertainty characterisation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Horwath ◽  
Anny Cazenave ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Time Series ◽  
Sea Level ◽  
Satellite Altimetry ◽  
Sea Level Change ◽  
Mass Change ◽  
Level Change ◽  
Ocean Mass ◽  
Global Mean Sea Level ◽  
Global Sea Level ◽  
Global Mean

<p>Studies of the global sea-level budget (SLB) and ocean-mass budget (OMB) are essential to assess the reliability of our knowledge of sea-level change and its contributors. The SLB is considered closed if the observed sea-level change agrees with the sum of independently assessed steric and mass contributions. The OMB is considered closed if the observed ocean-mass change is compatible with the sum of assessed mass contributions. </p><p>Here we present results from the Sea-Level Budget Closure (SLBC_cci) project conducted in the framework of ESA’s Climate Change Initiative (CCI). We used data products from CCI projects as well as newly-developed products based on CCI products and on additional data sources. Our focus on products developed in the same framework allowed us to exercise a consistent uncertainty characterisation and its propagation to the budget closure analyses, where the SLB and the OMB are assessed simultaneously. </p><p>We present time series of global mean sea-level changes from satellite altimetry; new time series of the global mean steric component generated from Argo drifter data with incorporation of sea surface temperature data; time series of ocean-mass change derived from GRACE satellite gravimetry; time series of global glacier mass change from a global glacier model; time series of mass changes of the Greenland Ice Sheet and the Antarctic Ice Sheet both from satellite radar altimetry and from GRACE; as well as time series of land water storage change from the WaterGAP global hydrological model. Our budget analyses address the periods 1993–2016 (covered by the satellite altimetry records) and 2003–2016 (covered by GRACE and the Argo drifter system). In terms of the mean rates of change (linear trends), the SLB is closed within uncertainties for both periods, and the OMB, assessable for 2003–2016 only, is also closed within uncertainties. Uncertainties (1-sigma) arising from the combined uncertainties of the elements of the different budgets considered are between 0.26 mm/yr and 0.40 mm/yr, that is, on the order of 10% of the magnitude of global mean sea-level rise, which is 3.05 ± 0.24 mm/yr and 3.65 ± 0.26 mm/yr for 1993-2016 and 2003-2016, respectively. We also assessed the budgets on a monthly time series basis. The statistics of monthly misclosure agrees with the combined uncertainties of the budget elements, which amount to typically 2-3 mm for the 2003–2016 period. We discuss possible origins of the residual misclosure.</p>

Effects of Sea-Level Rise and Subsidence on Deltas

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas S. Bianchi
Keyword(s):  
Thermal Expansion ◽  
Global Warming ◽  
Sea Level Rise ◽  
Sea Level ◽  
Sea Level Change ◽  
Mean Sea Level ◽  
Level Change ◽  
Global Mean Sea Level ◽  
Global Sea Level ◽  
Global Mean

As I briefly mentioned in Chapter 3, the global mean sea level, as deduced from the accumulation of paleo-sea level, tide gauge, and satellite-altimeter data, rose by 0.19 m (range, 0.17–0.21 m) between 1901 and 2010 (see Figure 3.3). Global mean sea level represents the longer-term global changes in sea level, without the short-term variability, and is also commonly called eustatic sea-level change. On an annual basis, global mean sea-level change translates to around 1.5 to 2 mm. During the last century, global sea level rose by 10 to 25 cm. Projections of sea-level rise for the period from 2000 to 2081 indicate that global mean sea-level rise will likely be as high as 0.52 to 0.98 m, or 8 to 16 mm/ yr, depending on the greenhouse gas emission scenarios used in the models. Mean sea-level rise is primarily controlled by ocean thermal expansion. But there is also transfer of water from land to ocean via melting of land ice, primarily in Greenland and Antarctica. Model predictions indicate that thermal expansion will increase with global warming because the contribution from glaciers will decrease as their volume is lost over time. (Take a look at Figure 5.1 if you have doubts about glaciers melting.) And remember our discussion in Chapter 2 about the role of the oceans in absorbing carbon dioxide (CO2) and the resultant ocean acidification in recent years. The global ocean also absorbs about 90% of all the net energy increase from global warming as well, which is why the ocean temperature is increasing, which in turn results in thermal expansion and sea-level rise. To make things even more complicated, the expansion of water will vary with latitude because expansion of seawater is greater with increasing temperature. In any event, sea level is expected to rise by 1 to 3 m per degree of warming over the next few millennia.

Global Mean Sea Level Change: Correction

Science ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 275 (5303) ◽  
pp. 1049i-1053 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. S. Nerem
Keyword(s):  
Sea Level ◽  
Sea Level Change ◽  
Mean Sea Level ◽  
Level Change ◽  
Global Mean Sea Level ◽  
Global Mean

scholarly journals On the “Cal-Mode” Correction to TOPEX Satellite Altimetry and Its Effect on the Global Mean Sea Level Time Series

2017 ◽  
Vol 122 (11) ◽  
pp. 8371-8384 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. D. Beckley ◽  
P. S. Callahan ◽  
D. W. Hancock ◽  
G. T. Mitchum ◽  
R. D. Ray
Keyword(s):  
Time Series ◽  
Sea Level ◽  
Satellite Altimetry ◽  
Mean Sea Level ◽  
Global Mean Sea Level ◽  
Global Mean

scholarly journals Variations in global mean sea level associated with the 1997-1998 ENSO event: Implications for measuring long term sea level change

1999 ◽  
Vol 26 (19) ◽  
pp. 3005-3008 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. S. Nerem ◽  
D. P. Chambers ◽  
E. W. Leuliette ◽  
G. T. Mitchum ◽  
B. S. Giese
Keyword(s):  
Sea Level ◽  
Sea Level Change ◽  
Enso Event ◽  
Mean Sea Level ◽  
Level Change ◽  
Global Mean Sea Level ◽  
Global Mean

scholarly journals The certitude of a global sea level acceleration during the satellite altimeter era

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-40
Author(s):  
H. Bâki İz ◽  
C.K. Shum
Keyword(s):  
Sea Level ◽  
Satellite Altimetry ◽  
Mean Sea Level ◽  
Sea Level Acceleration ◽  
Kinematic Models ◽  
Sea Level Variations ◽  
Global Mean Sea Level ◽  
Global Sea Level ◽  
Omission Errors ◽  
Global Mean

AbstractRecent studies reported a uniform global sea level acceleration during the satellite altimetry era (1993–2017) by analyzing globally averaged satellite altimetry measurements. Here, we discuss potential omission errors that were not thoroughly addressed in detecting and estimating the reported global sea level acceleration in these studies. Our analyses results demonstrate that the declared acceleration in recent studies can also be explained equally well by alternative kinematic models based on previously well-established multi-decadal global mean sea level variations of various origins, which suggests prudence before declaring the presence of an accelerating global mean sea level with confidence during the satellite altimetry era.

A revised sea level budget equation to accurately represent physical processes driving sea level rise

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bramha Dutt Vishwakarma ◽  
Sam Royston ◽  
Ricardo E. M. Riva ◽  
Richard M. Westaway ◽  
Jonathan L. Bamber
Keyword(s):  
Solid Earth ◽  
Sea Level ◽  
Sea Level Change ◽  
Ocean Bottom ◽  
Physical Processes ◽  
Level Change ◽  
Ocean Mass ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Regional Sea Level ◽  
Global Mean

<p>The sea level budget (SLB) equates changes in sea surface height (SSH) to the sum of various geo-physical processes that contribute to sea level change. Currently, it is a common practice to explain a change in SSH as a sum of ocean mass and steric change, assuming that solid-Earth motion is corrected for and completely explained by secular visco-elastic relaxation of mantle, due to the process of glacial isostatic adjustment. Yet, since the Solid Earth also responds elastically to changes in present day mass load near the surface of the Earth, we can expect the ocean bottom to respond to ongoing ocean mass changes. This elastic ocean bottom deformation (OBD) has been ignored until very recently because the contribution of ocean mass to sea level rise was thought to be smaller than the steric contribution and the resulting OBD was within observation system uncertainties. However, ocean mass change has increased rapidly in the last 2 decades. Therefore, OBD is no longer negligible and recent studies have shown that its magnitude is similar to that of the deep steric sea level contribution: a global mean of about 0.1 mm/yr but regional changes at some places can be more than 10 times the global mean. Although now an important part of the SLB, especially for regional sea level, OBD is considered by only a few budget studies and they treat it as a spatially uniform correction. This is due to lack of a mathematical framework that defines the contribution of OBD to the SLB. Here, we use a mass-volume framework to derive, for the first time, a SLB equation that partitions SSH change into its component parts accurately and it includes OBD as a physical response of the Earth system. This updated SLB equation is important for various disciplines of Earth Sciences that use the SLB equation: as a constraint to assess the quality of observational time-series; as a means to quantify the importance of each component of sea level change; and, to adequately include all processes in global and regional sea level projections. We recommend using the updated SLB equation for sea level budget studies. We also revisit the contemporary SLB with the updated SLB equation using satellite altimetry data, GRACE data, and ARGO data.</p>

Consolidating Sea Level Acceleration Estimates from Altimetry for the 1991-2019 Period

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ole Baltazar Andersen ◽  
Tadea Veng
Keyword(s):  
Time Series ◽  
Sea Level ◽  
Global Ocean ◽  
Sea Level Changes ◽  
Sea Level Acceleration ◽  
Spatial Coverage ◽  
Pinatubo Eruption ◽  
Global Mean Sea Level ◽  
Global Sea Level ◽  
Global Mean

<p>More than 28 years of high precision satellite altimetry enables analysis of recent global sea level changes. Several studies have determined the trend and acceleration of global mean sea level (GMSL). This is however done almost exclusively with data from the TOPEX/Poseidon, Jason-1, Jason-2 and Jason-3 satellites (TPJ data). In this study we extend the altimetry record in both time and space by including independent data from the ERS-1, ERS-2, Envisat and CryoSat-2 satellites (ESA data). This increases the time-series to span more than 28 years (1991.7-2020.0) and the spatial coverage is extended from ± 66⁰ to ± 82⁰ latitude. Another advantage of the ESA data is that it is independent of the Cal-1 mode issues which introduces a significant uncertainty to the first 6 years of data from the TOPEX altimeter. Resulting GMSL accelerations of 0.080 ± 0.008 mm/yr<sup>2</sup> (TPJ) and 0.095 ± 0.009 mm/yr<sup>2</sup> (ESA).The distribution of sea level acceleration across the global ocean are highly similar between the ESA and TPJ dataset. </p><p>The Pinatubo eruption in 1991 and El-Nino Southern Ocean Oscillation will both affect GMSL. Particularly so as Pinatubo erupted right before the launch of the first ERS-1 satellite. The decrease in GMSL during the first years is seen in the ERS-1 data. We conclude that the effect of the Pinatubo as well as the ENSO effect on GMSL acceleration estimates are below the noise level with the extended time series.</p><p> </p>

scholarly journals Sea State Bias Variability in Satellite Altimetry Data

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1176
Author(s):  
Yongcun Cheng ◽  
Qing Xu ◽  
Le Gao ◽  
Xiaofeng Li ◽  
Bin Zou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Level ◽  
Sea Level Change ◽  
Sea State ◽  
Mean Sea Level ◽  
Level Change ◽  
Sea State Bias ◽  
Regional Sea Level ◽  
Sea Level Trend ◽  
Global Mean Sea Level ◽  
Global Mean

Sea State Bias (SSB) contributes to global mean sea level variability and it needs cm-level range adjustment due to the instrumental drift over time. To investigate its variations and correct the global and regional sea level trend precisely, we calculate the temporal and spatial variability of the SSB correction in TOPEX, Jason-1, Jason-2 and Jason-3 missions, separately, as well as in the combined missions over the period 1993–2017. The long-term trend in global mean operational 2D non-parametric SSB correction is about −0.03 ± 0.03 mm/yr, which accounts for 1% of current global mean sea level change rate during 1993–2016. This correction contributes to sea level change rates of −1.27 ± 0.21 mm/yr and −0.26 ± 0.13 mm/yr in TOPEX-A and Jason-2 missions, respectively. The global mean SSB varies up to 7–10 mm during the very strong ENSO events in 1997–1998 and 2015–2016. Furthermore, the TOPEX SSB trend, which is consistent with recently reported sea level trend drift during 1993–1998, may leak into the determined global sea level trend in the period. Moreover, the Jason-1/2 zonal SSB variability is highly correlated with the significant wave height (SWH). On zonal average, SSB correction causes about 1% uncertainty in mean sea level trend. At high SWH regions, the uncertainties grow to 2–4% near the 50°N and 60°S bands. This should be considered in the study of regional sea level variability.

Vertical land motion in the Iberian Atlantic coast and its implications for sea level change evaluation

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 361-378
Author(s):  
V. B. Mendes ◽  
S. M. Barbosa ◽  
D. Carinhas
Keyword(s):  
Time Series ◽  
Sea Level ◽  
Satellite Altimetry ◽  
Tide Gauge ◽  
Atlantic Coast ◽  
Sea Level Change ◽  
Tide Gauges ◽  
Tide Gauge Records ◽  
Level Change ◽  
Vertical Land Motion

AbstractIn this study, we estimate vertical land motion for 35 stations primarily located along the coastline of Portugal and Spain, using GPS time series with at least eight years of observations. Based on this set of GPS stations, our results show that vertical land motion along the Iberian coastline is characterized, in general, by a low to moderate subsidence, ranging from −2.2 mm yr−1 to 0.4 mm yr−1, partially explained by the glacial isostatic adjustment geophysical signal. The estimates of vertical land motion are subsequently applied in the analysis of tide gauge records and compared with geocentric estimates of sea level change. Geocentric sea level for the Iberian Atlantic coast determined from satellite altimetry for the last three decades has a mean of 2.5 ± 0.6 mm yr−1, with a significant range, as seen for a subset of grid points located in the vicinity of tide gauge stations, which present trends varying from 1.5 mm yr−1 to 3.2 mm yr−1. Relative sea level determined from tide gauges for this region shows a high degree of spatial variability, that can be partially explained not only by the difference in length and quality of the time series, but also for possible undocumented datum shifts, turning some trends unreliable. In general, tide gauges corrected for vertical land motion produce smaller trends than satellite altimetry. Tide gauge trends for the last three decades not corrected for vertical land motion range from 0.3 mm yr−1 to 5.0 mm yr−1 with a mean of 2.6 ± 1.4 mm yr−1, similar to that obtained from satellite altimetry. When corrected for vertical land motion, we observe a reduction of the mean to ∼1.9 ± 1.4 mm yr−1. Actions to improve our knowledge of vertical land motion using space geodesy, such as establishing stations in co-location with tide gauges, will contribute to better evaluate sea level change and its impacts on coastal regions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document