Unveiling ductile deformation during fast exhumation of a granitic pluton in a transfer zone

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Spiess ◽  
Antonio Langone ◽  
Alfredo Caggianelli ◽  
Finlay M. Stuart ◽  
Martina Zucchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shear Zones ◽  
Integrated Approach ◽  
Field Studies ◽  
Ductile Deformation ◽  
Exhumation Rate ◽  
Pluton Emplacement ◽  
Ductile Shear Zones ◽  
Granitic Intrusion ◽  
Rheological Modeling ◽  
Extensional Setting

<p>Exhumation and cooling of upper crustal plutons is generally assumed to develop in the brittle domain, thus determining an abrupt passage from crystallization to faulting. To challenge this general statement, we have applied an integrated approach involving meso- and micro-structural studies, thermochronology, geochronology and rheological modeling. We have analyzed the Miocene syn-tectonic Porto Azzurro pluton on Elba (Tuscan archipelago – Italy), emplaced in an extensional setting, and have realized that its fast exhumation is accompanied by localized ductile shear zones, developing along dykes and veins, later affected by brittle deformation. This is unequivocally highlighted by field studies and the analysis of microstructures with EBSD. In order to constrain the emplacement and exhumation rate of the Porto Azzurro pluton we performed U-Pb zircon dating and (U+Th)/He apatite thermochronology. It results in a magma emplacement age of 6.4 ± 0.4 Ma and an exhumation rate of 3.4 to 3.9 mm/yr. By thermo-rheological modeling we were able to establish that localized ductile deformation occurred at two different time steps: within felsic dykes when the pluton first entered into the brittle field at 380 kyr, and along quartz-rich hydrothermal veins at c. 550 kyr after pluton emplacement. Hence, the major conclusion of our data is that ductile deformation can affect a granitic intrusion even when it is entered into the brittle domain in a fast exhuming extensional regime.</p>

Chapter 3 Archean (>2.6 Ga) and Paleoproterozoic (2.5–1.8 Ga), pre- and syn-orogenic magmatism, sedimentation and mineralization in the Norrbotten and Överkalix lithotectonic units, Svecokarelian orogen

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Bergman ◽  
Pär Weihed
Keyword(s):  
Variable Temperature ◽  
Tectonic Setting ◽  
Active Continental Margin ◽  
Volcanic Rocks ◽  
Shear Zones ◽  
Ductile Deformation ◽  
Fe Oxide ◽  
Ductile Shear Zones ◽  
Three Stages ◽  
Felsic Volcanic

AbstractTwo lithotectonic units (the Norrbotten and Överkalix units) occur inside the Paleoproterozoic (2.0–1.8 Ga) Svecokarelian orogen in northernmost Sweden. Archean (2.8–2.6 Ga and possibly older) basement, affected by a relict Neoarchean tectonometamorphic event, and early Paleoproterozoic (2.5–2.0 Ga) cover rocks constitute the pre-orogenic components in the orogen that are unique in Sweden. Siliciclastic sedimentary rocks, predominantly felsic volcanic rocks, and both spatially and temporally linked intrusive rock suites, deposited and emplaced at 1.9–1.8 Ga, form the syn-orogenic component. These magmatic suites evolved from magnesian and calc-alkaline to alkali–calcic compositions to ferroan and alkali–calcic varieties in a subduction-related tectonic setting. Apatite–Fe oxide, including the world's two largest underground Fe ore mines (Kiruna and Malmberget), skarn-related Fe oxide, base metal sulphide, and epigenetic Cu–Au and Au deposits occur in the Norrbotten lithotectonic unit. Low- to medium-pressure and variable temperature metamorphic conditions and polyphase Svecokarelian ductile deformation prevailed. The general northwesterly or north-northeasterly structural grain is controlled by ductile shear zones. The Paleotectonic evolution after the Neoarchean involved three stages: (1) intracratonic rifting prior to 2.0 Ga; (2) tectonic juxtaposition of the lithotectonic units during crustal shortening prior to 1.89 Ga; and (3) accretionary tectonic evolution along an active continental margin at 1.9–1.8 Ga.

Ductile shear zones – future perspectives

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Schrank
Keyword(s):  
Shear Zone ◽  
Research Effort ◽  
Rheological Behaviour ◽  
Shear Zones ◽  
Ductile Deformation ◽  
Field Observations ◽  
Ductile Shear Zones ◽  
In Situ Experiments ◽  
Ductile Shear ◽  
Physical Consequences

<p>About 50 years ago, John Ramsay and colleagues established the thorough foundation for the field-scale observational and mathematical description of the structures, deformation, and kinematics in ductile shear zones. Since then, these probably most important instabilities of the ductile lithosphere enjoyed an almost explosive growth in scientific attention. It is perhaps fair to say that this tremendous research effort featured four main themes:</p><p> </p><p>[1] The historic scientific nucleus – quantification of shear-zone geometry, strain and associated kinematic history from field observations</p><p> </p><p>[2] Qualitative and quantitative analysis of microphysical deformation mechanisms in the field and the laboratory</p><p> </p><p>[3] Shear-zone rheology</p><p> </p><p>[4] The development of physically consistent mathematical models for shear zones, mainly using continuum mechanics.</p><p> </p><p>In concert, these four cornerstones of shear-zone research enabled tremendous progress in our understanding of why and how ductile shear zones form. So, what are some of the outstanding problems?</p><p> </p><p>A truly comprehensive model for ductile shear zones must account for the vast range of length and time scales involved, each easily covering ten orders of magnitude, as well as the associated intimate coupling between thermal, hydraulic, mechanical, and chemical processes. The multi-scale and multi-physics nature of ductile shear zones generates scientific challenges for all four research themes named above. This presentation is dedicated to highlighting exciting challenges in themes 2, and 3 and 4.</p><p> </p><p>In the microanalytical arena [2], the nano-scale is an exciting new frontier, especially when it comes to the interplay between metamorphism and ductile deformation. The nano-frontier can be tackled with new synchrotron methods. I showcase some applications to fossil shear-zone samples and discuss opportunities for in-situ experiments. In the domain of rheology [3], I present some simple experiments with strain-softening materials and field observations that support the notion: transient rheological behaviour is very important for shear localisation. In the modelling domain [4], some recent examples for the intriguing physical consequences predicted by new multi-physics and cross-scale coupling terms in ductile localisation problems are illustrated.</p>

scholarly journals Reaction of Precambrian high-grade gneisses to mid-crustal ductile deformation in western Dove Bugt, North-East Greenland

1994 ◽  
Vol 162 ◽  
pp. 53-70
Author(s):  
B Chadwick ◽  
C.R.L Friend
Keyword(s):  
Shear Zones ◽  
Ductile Deformation ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
High Grade ◽  
East Greenland ◽  
North West ◽  
North East ◽  
Basin Development ◽  
Ductile Shear Zones ◽  
Partial Melts

Mid-crustal deformation of an Early Proterozoic high-grade gneiss complex in western Dove Bugt gave rise to at least two sets of nappes. Structures in mylonites in low-angle ductile shear zones associated with the younger nappes indicate north-easterly-directed displacements. The nappes and mylonites are folded by upright to inclined folds that verge north-west and which appear to be associated with decollements that dip south-east. Hornblende, sillimanite and anatectic partial melts that developed with the nappes, mylonites and younger folds show that deformation took place under amphibolite facies conditions. Several lines of evidence suggest that the younger nappes, the mylonites and the upright to inclined folds formed during the Caledonian orogeny. Some pre-Caledonian deformation may be represented by the oldest isoclinal folds. Numerous, small-scale, ductile extensional shear zones and more brittIe fractures that were superimposed across the Caledonian structures are believed to have formed during orogen-parallel collapse which may be related IO Devonian basin development farther south in central East Greenland. Younger fauIts and major joints are correlated with Carboniferous, Mesozoic and Tertiary basin development in North-East Greenland.

The Watershed Tungsten Deposit, Northeast Queensland, Australia: Permian Metamorphic Tungsten Mineralization Overprinting Carboniferous Magmatic Tungsten

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaime A. Poblete ◽  
Paul H.G.M. Dirks ◽  
Zhaoshan Chang ◽  
Jan Marten Huizenga ◽  
Martin Griessmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Depositional Environment ◽  
Weighted Average ◽  
Shear Zones ◽  
Ductile Deformation ◽  
Tungsten Deposit ◽  
Metasedimentary Rocks ◽  
Vein Formation ◽  
Ductile Shear Zones ◽  
Stage 4 ◽  
Tungsten Mineralization

Abstract The Watershed tungsten deposit (49.2 Mt avg 0.14% WO3) lies within the Mossman orogen, which comprises deformed Silurian-Ordovician metasedimentary rocks of the Hodgkinson Formation intruded by Carboniferous-Permian granites of the Kennedy Igneous Association. The Hodgkinson Formation in the Watershed area comprises skarn-altered conglomerate, psammite, and slate units that record four deformation events evolving from ductile, isoclinal, colinear folding with transposition (D1–D3) to brittle ductile shear zones (D4). Multiple felsic to intermediate dikes cut across the metasedimentary rocks at Watershed including: (1) Carboniferous, monzonite dikes (zircon U/Pb age of 350 ± 7 Ma) emplaced during D1–2; and (2) Permian granite plutons and dikes (zircon U/Pb ages of 291 ± 6, 277 ± 6, and 274 ± 6 Ma) and diorite (zircon U/Pb age of 281 ± 5 Ma) emplaced during D4. Tungsten mineralization is largely restricted to skarn-altered conglomerate, which preserves a peak metamorphic mineralogy formed during ductile deformation and comprises garnet (Grt40–87 Alm0–35Sps1–25Adr0–16), actinolite, quartz, clinopyroxene (Di36–59Hd39–61Jhn1–5), and titanite. A first mineralization event corresponds to the crystallization of disseminated scheelite in monzonite dikes (pre-D3) and adjacent units, with scheelite grains aligned in the S1–2 fabric and affected by D3 folding. This event enriched the Hodgkinson Formation in tungsten. The bulk of the scheelite mineralization formed during a second event and is concentrated in multistaged, shear-related, quartz-oligoclase-bearing veins and vein halos (muscovite 40Ar-39Ar weighted average age of 276 ± 6 Ma), which were emplaced during D4. The multistage veins developed preferentially in competent, skarn-altered conglomerate units and formed synchronous with four retrograde alteration stages. The retrograde skarn minerals include clinozoisite after garnet, quartz, plagioclase, scheelite, and phlogopite with minor sodium-rich amphibole, which formed during retrograde stages 1 and 2, accompanied by later muscovite, calcite, and chlorite formed during retrograde stage 3. Retrograde stage 4 was a late-tectonic, noneconomic sulfide stage. The principal controls on scheelite mineralization at Watershed were the following: (1) early monzonite dikes enriched in scheelite; (2) D4 shear zones that acted as fluid conduits transporting tungsten from source areas to traps; (3) skarn-altered conglomerate lenses that provide a competent host to facilitate vein formation and a source for calcium to form scheelite; and (4) an extensional depositional environment characterized by vein formation and normal faulting, which provide trapping structures for tungsten-bearing fluids, with decompression being a likely control on scheelite deposition. The coexistence of scheelite with oligoclase in monzonite dikes and veins suggests that tungsten was transported as NaHWO40. Exploration in the area should target Carboniferous monzonite, associated with later syn-D4 shear zones cutting skarn-altered conglomerate.

LONGEVITY OF DUCTILE SHEAR ZONES FROM DIFFUSION GEOSPEEDOMETRY OF KINEMATICALLY-SENSITIVE MINERAL INCLUSIONS

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
William O. Nachlas ◽  
◽  
Christian Teyssier ◽  
Donna L. Whitney ◽  
Greg Hirth
Keyword(s):  
Shear Zones ◽  
Mineral Inclusions ◽  
Ductile Shear Zones ◽  
Ductile Shear

What controls the width of ductile shear zones?

2021 ◽  
pp. 229033
Author(s):  
T.K. Cawood ◽  
J.P. Platt
Keyword(s):  
Shear Zones ◽  
Ductile Shear Zones ◽  
Ductile Shear
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document