Faced with the anthropic activities of urban streams stretches through
rectification with concrete, there is a concern about the modifications
of the aquatic habitats and consequent ecological damages to the
ecosystems. Based on biophilic engineering, there is a great opportunity
to idealize and test interventions to revitalize such hampered
ecosystems. Hence, we verified the performance of biological and organic
factors, after the implementation of one-off interventions in three
rivers using biophilic handmade materials and structural elements in
their fixation. We carried out the project in urban stretches of
concrete bed streams, located in Sorocaba-SP, Southeast of Brazil. In
two years, we conducted biweekly in situ and laboratory measurements to
characterize the study sites, idealize, scale, implement the projects,
and, evaluate the ecological responses of the implementations. We
collected sampling in two points: upstream and downstream interventions.
We evaluated the performance of the interventions through the analysis
of SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) factors and
by using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). We presented the results
through a decision-making matrix for stakeholders, which indicated that
our ideas are of low cost and easy to implement. Then, we got the
following scenario of SWOT priorities: opportunity (58.55%), strength
(24.71%), threat (10.74%), and weakness (6.00%). They demand constant
efforts for maintenances and they need adjustments to a better
understood by residents and the watershed management. We concluded that
the strengths observed in the project turn our idea replicable in any
part because it attaches the idea of caring about the environment
through biophilic techniques, and the weaknesses are liable to
modifications (improvements) in future projects that consider such
proposal.